Cargando…
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Head and Neck Cancer Stage and Treatment Duration
Objective To assess the efficacy of oncologic healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in a tertiary university hospital in Germany. Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 94 patients with newly diagnosed...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967177 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26744 |
Sumario: | Objective To assess the efficacy of oncologic healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in a tertiary university hospital in Germany. Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study included 94 patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma during a two-year period. Patients were assigned to two date-dependent groups; referrals before (group A) and during (group B) the COVID-19 pandemic. Time intervals from the symptom(s) onset to diagnosis, diagnosis to treatment, and treatment initiation to completion were recorded. Furthermore, TNM stages and the application of reconstructive surgery with free tissue transfer were determined. Patients’ outcomes and characteristics were compared between the two groups. Finally, a comprehensive literature review was carried out to identify similar epidemiological studies. Results The symptom-to-diagnosis interval was longer during the COVID-19 pandemic [median 9.5 (A) versus 15 (B) weeks, p = 0.054]. The intervals from diagnosis to treatment and treatment initiation to end of treatment were approximately the same in both groups [median 3 (A) versus 3.2 (B) weeks, p = 0.264; and 6.9 (A) versus 6.3 (B) weeks, p = 0.136]. The T-and N-stages were not higher during the pandemic [early T-stage (T1+T2) versus advanced T-stage (T3+T4), p = 0.668; and N-negative (N0) versus N-positive status (N1,2,3), p = 0.301]. Patients who presented with distant metastatic disease and those who underwent reconstructive surgery with free tissue transfer were observed more frequently in the lockdown phase [M1 versus M0, p= 0.022; and flap versus no flap, p=0.007]. Conclusion This study suggests the consistent diagnostic and therapeutical performance of the tertiary oncologic healthcare in Berlin, Germany, despite the challenges that patient care units faced during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
---|