Cargando…

History of fecal transplantation; camel feces contains limited amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores and likely has no traditional role in the treatment of dysentery

INTRODUCTION: A widely cited story on the origins of fecal transplantation suggests that German soldiers in North Africa used camel feces containing Bacillus subtilis to treat dysentery in World War 2. We investigated if this story is accurate and if there is sufficient Bacillus subtilis in camel fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koopman, Nienke, van Leeuwen, Pim, Brul, Stanley, Seppen, Jurgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35947590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272607
_version_ 1784765288372240384
author Koopman, Nienke
van Leeuwen, Pim
Brul, Stanley
Seppen, Jurgen
author_facet Koopman, Nienke
van Leeuwen, Pim
Brul, Stanley
Seppen, Jurgen
author_sort Koopman, Nienke
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A widely cited story on the origins of fecal transplantation suggests that German soldiers in North Africa used camel feces containing Bacillus subtilis to treat dysentery in World War 2. We investigated if this story is accurate and if there is sufficient Bacillus subtilis in camel feces to be potentially therapeutic. METHODS AND RESULTS: A literature analysis shows that all references to the story are based on a single review paper that mentions the use of camel feces in passing and only provides indirect evidence for this claim. An extensive literature search failed to find independent evidence that camel feces has traditionally been used in the treatment of dysentery in North Africa. With 16S sequence analysis we did not detect Bacillus subtilis in feces from two different Egyptian camels. Using a more sensitive culture-based assay we could detect low amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores in these fecal samples, with comparable concentrations to those present in human feces and soil. CONCLUSIONS: Because we could not find evidence for the use of camel feces in the treatment of diarrhea and because we show that only low amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores are present in camel feces, we conclude that the use of camel feces should no longer be mentioned in the context of origins of fecal transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9365175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93651752022-08-11 History of fecal transplantation; camel feces contains limited amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores and likely has no traditional role in the treatment of dysentery Koopman, Nienke van Leeuwen, Pim Brul, Stanley Seppen, Jurgen PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: A widely cited story on the origins of fecal transplantation suggests that German soldiers in North Africa used camel feces containing Bacillus subtilis to treat dysentery in World War 2. We investigated if this story is accurate and if there is sufficient Bacillus subtilis in camel feces to be potentially therapeutic. METHODS AND RESULTS: A literature analysis shows that all references to the story are based on a single review paper that mentions the use of camel feces in passing and only provides indirect evidence for this claim. An extensive literature search failed to find independent evidence that camel feces has traditionally been used in the treatment of dysentery in North Africa. With 16S sequence analysis we did not detect Bacillus subtilis in feces from two different Egyptian camels. Using a more sensitive culture-based assay we could detect low amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores in these fecal samples, with comparable concentrations to those present in human feces and soil. CONCLUSIONS: Because we could not find evidence for the use of camel feces in the treatment of diarrhea and because we show that only low amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores are present in camel feces, we conclude that the use of camel feces should no longer be mentioned in the context of origins of fecal transplantation. Public Library of Science 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9365175/ /pubmed/35947590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272607 Text en © 2022 Koopman et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Koopman, Nienke
van Leeuwen, Pim
Brul, Stanley
Seppen, Jurgen
History of fecal transplantation; camel feces contains limited amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores and likely has no traditional role in the treatment of dysentery
title History of fecal transplantation; camel feces contains limited amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores and likely has no traditional role in the treatment of dysentery
title_full History of fecal transplantation; camel feces contains limited amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores and likely has no traditional role in the treatment of dysentery
title_fullStr History of fecal transplantation; camel feces contains limited amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores and likely has no traditional role in the treatment of dysentery
title_full_unstemmed History of fecal transplantation; camel feces contains limited amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores and likely has no traditional role in the treatment of dysentery
title_short History of fecal transplantation; camel feces contains limited amounts of Bacillus subtilis spores and likely has no traditional role in the treatment of dysentery
title_sort history of fecal transplantation; camel feces contains limited amounts of bacillus subtilis spores and likely has no traditional role in the treatment of dysentery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35947590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272607
work_keys_str_mv AT koopmannienke historyoffecaltransplantationcamelfecescontainslimitedamountsofbacillussubtilissporesandlikelyhasnotraditionalroleinthetreatmentofdysentery
AT vanleeuwenpim historyoffecaltransplantationcamelfecescontainslimitedamountsofbacillussubtilissporesandlikelyhasnotraditionalroleinthetreatmentofdysentery
AT brulstanley historyoffecaltransplantationcamelfecescontainslimitedamountsofbacillussubtilissporesandlikelyhasnotraditionalroleinthetreatmentofdysentery
AT seppenjurgen historyoffecaltransplantationcamelfecescontainslimitedamountsofbacillussubtilissporesandlikelyhasnotraditionalroleinthetreatmentofdysentery