Cargando…

AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are important for measuring quality of care, particularly for interventions aimed at improving symptom bother such as procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. We aimed to create a concise yet comprehensive PRO measurement tool to assess pelvic organ prolapse care in high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Shea, Michele, Boyles, Sarah, Bradley, Catherine S., Jacobs, Kristin, McFatrich, Molly, Sung, Vivian, Weinfurt, Kevin, Siddiqui, Nazema Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001225
_version_ 1784765307990048768
author O’Shea, Michele
Boyles, Sarah
Bradley, Catherine S.
Jacobs, Kristin
McFatrich, Molly
Sung, Vivian
Weinfurt, Kevin
Siddiqui, Nazema Y.
author_facet O’Shea, Michele
Boyles, Sarah
Bradley, Catherine S.
Jacobs, Kristin
McFatrich, Molly
Sung, Vivian
Weinfurt, Kevin
Siddiqui, Nazema Y.
author_sort O’Shea, Michele
collection PubMed
description Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are important for measuring quality of care, particularly for interventions aimed at improving symptom bother such as procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. We aimed to create a concise yet comprehensive PRO measurement tool to assess pelvic organ prolapse care in high-volume clinical environments. METHODS: The relevant concepts to measure prolapse treatment quality were first established through literature review, qualitative interviews, and a patient and provider-driven consensus-building process. Extant items mapping to these concepts, or domains, were identified from an existing pool of patient-reported symptoms and condition-specific and generic health-related quality of life measures. Item classification was performed to group items assessing similar concepts while eliminating items that were redundant, inconsistent with domains, or overly complex. A consensus meeting was held in March 2020 where patient and provider working groups ranked the remaining candidate items in order of relevance to measure prolapse treatment quality. After subsequent expert review, the revised candidate items underwent cognitive interview testing and were further refined. RESULTS: Fifteen relevant PRO instruments were initially identified, and 358 items were considered for inclusion. After 2 iterative consensus reviews and 4 rounds of cognitive interviewing with 19 patients, 11 final candidate items were identified. These items map 5 consensus-based domains that include awareness and bother from prolapse, physical function, physical discomfort during sexual activity, pain, and urinary/defecatory symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We present a concise set of candidate items that were developed using rigorous patient-centered methodology and a national consensus process, including urogynecologic patients and providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9365262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93652622022-08-11 AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care O’Shea, Michele Boyles, Sarah Bradley, Catherine S. Jacobs, Kristin McFatrich, Molly Sung, Vivian Weinfurt, Kevin Siddiqui, Nazema Y. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg AUGS Conference Report Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are important for measuring quality of care, particularly for interventions aimed at improving symptom bother such as procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. We aimed to create a concise yet comprehensive PRO measurement tool to assess pelvic organ prolapse care in high-volume clinical environments. METHODS: The relevant concepts to measure prolapse treatment quality were first established through literature review, qualitative interviews, and a patient and provider-driven consensus-building process. Extant items mapping to these concepts, or domains, were identified from an existing pool of patient-reported symptoms and condition-specific and generic health-related quality of life measures. Item classification was performed to group items assessing similar concepts while eliminating items that were redundant, inconsistent with domains, or overly complex. A consensus meeting was held in March 2020 where patient and provider working groups ranked the remaining candidate items in order of relevance to measure prolapse treatment quality. After subsequent expert review, the revised candidate items underwent cognitive interview testing and were further refined. RESULTS: Fifteen relevant PRO instruments were initially identified, and 358 items were considered for inclusion. After 2 iterative consensus reviews and 4 rounds of cognitive interviewing with 19 patients, 11 final candidate items were identified. These items map 5 consensus-based domains that include awareness and bother from prolapse, physical function, physical discomfort during sexual activity, pain, and urinary/defecatory symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We present a concise set of candidate items that were developed using rigorous patient-centered methodology and a national consensus process, including urogynecologic patients and providers. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9365262/ /pubmed/35982987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001225 Text en © 2022 American Urogynecologic Society. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle AUGS Conference Report
O’Shea, Michele
Boyles, Sarah
Bradley, Catherine S.
Jacobs, Kristin
McFatrich, Molly
Sung, Vivian
Weinfurt, Kevin
Siddiqui, Nazema Y.
AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care
title AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care
title_full AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care
title_fullStr AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care
title_full_unstemmed AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care
title_short AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care
title_sort augs-perform: a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess quality of prolapse care
topic AUGS Conference Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35982987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001225
work_keys_str_mv AT osheamichele augsperformanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuretoassessqualityofprolapsecare
AT boylessarah augsperformanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuretoassessqualityofprolapsecare
AT bradleycatherines augsperformanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuretoassessqualityofprolapsecare
AT jacobskristin augsperformanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuretoassessqualityofprolapsecare
AT mcfatrichmolly augsperformanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuretoassessqualityofprolapsecare
AT sungvivian augsperformanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuretoassessqualityofprolapsecare
AT weinfurtkevin augsperformanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuretoassessqualityofprolapsecare
AT siddiquinazemay augsperformanewpatientreportedoutcomemeasuretoassessqualityofprolapsecare