Cargando…
Quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3D late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods( )
AIMS: Various methods and post-processing software packages have been developed to quantify left atrial (LA) fibrosis using 3D late gadolinium-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) images. Currently, it remains unclear how the results of these methods and software packages interrelate. ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35947873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeab245 |
_version_ | 1784765317677842432 |
---|---|
author | Hopman, Luuk H G A Bhagirath, Pranav Mulder, Mark J Eggink, Iris N van Rossum, Albert C Allaart, Cornelis P Götte, Marco J W |
author_facet | Hopman, Luuk H G A Bhagirath, Pranav Mulder, Mark J Eggink, Iris N van Rossum, Albert C Allaart, Cornelis P Götte, Marco J W |
author_sort | Hopman, Luuk H G A |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Various methods and post-processing software packages have been developed to quantify left atrial (LA) fibrosis using 3D late gadolinium-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) images. Currently, it remains unclear how the results of these methods and software packages interrelate. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-seven atrial fibrillation (AF) patients underwent 3D-LGE-CMR imaging prior to their AF ablation. LA fibrotic burden was derived from the images using open-source CEMRG software and commercially available ADAS 3D-LA software. Both packages were used to calculate fibrosis based on the image intensity ratio (IIR)-method. Additionally, CEMRG was used to quantify LA fibrosis using three standard deviations (3SD) above the mean blood pool signal intensity. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to compare LA fibrosis quantification methods and different post-processing software outputs. The percentage of LA fibrosis assessed using IIR threshold 1.2 was significantly different from the 3SD-method (29.80 ± 14.15% vs. 8.43 ± 5.42%; P < 0.001). Correlation between the IIR-and SD-method was good (r = 0.85, P < 0.001) although agreement was poor [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.19; P < 0.001]. One-third of the patients were allocated to a different fibrosis category dependent on the used quantification method. Fibrosis assessment using CEMRG and ADAS 3D-LA showed good agreement for the IIR-method (ICC = 0.93; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both, the IIR1.2 and 3SD-method quantify atrial fibrotic burden based on atrial wall signal intensity differences. The discrepancy in the amount of LA fibrosis between these methods may have clinical implications when patients are classified according to their fibrotic burden. There was no difference in results between post-processing software packages to quantify LA fibrosis if an identical quantification method including the threshold was used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9365307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93653072022-08-11 Quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3D late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods( ) Hopman, Luuk H G A Bhagirath, Pranav Mulder, Mark J Eggink, Iris N van Rossum, Albert C Allaart, Cornelis P Götte, Marco J W Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Original Paper AIMS: Various methods and post-processing software packages have been developed to quantify left atrial (LA) fibrosis using 3D late gadolinium-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) images. Currently, it remains unclear how the results of these methods and software packages interrelate. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-seven atrial fibrillation (AF) patients underwent 3D-LGE-CMR imaging prior to their AF ablation. LA fibrotic burden was derived from the images using open-source CEMRG software and commercially available ADAS 3D-LA software. Both packages were used to calculate fibrosis based on the image intensity ratio (IIR)-method. Additionally, CEMRG was used to quantify LA fibrosis using three standard deviations (3SD) above the mean blood pool signal intensity. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to compare LA fibrosis quantification methods and different post-processing software outputs. The percentage of LA fibrosis assessed using IIR threshold 1.2 was significantly different from the 3SD-method (29.80 ± 14.15% vs. 8.43 ± 5.42%; P < 0.001). Correlation between the IIR-and SD-method was good (r = 0.85, P < 0.001) although agreement was poor [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.19; P < 0.001]. One-third of the patients were allocated to a different fibrosis category dependent on the used quantification method. Fibrosis assessment using CEMRG and ADAS 3D-LA showed good agreement for the IIR-method (ICC = 0.93; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both, the IIR1.2 and 3SD-method quantify atrial fibrotic burden based on atrial wall signal intensity differences. The discrepancy in the amount of LA fibrosis between these methods may have clinical implications when patients are classified according to their fibrotic burden. There was no difference in results between post-processing software packages to quantify LA fibrosis if an identical quantification method including the threshold was used. Oxford University Press 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9365307/ /pubmed/35947873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeab245 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Hopman, Luuk H G A Bhagirath, Pranav Mulder, Mark J Eggink, Iris N van Rossum, Albert C Allaart, Cornelis P Götte, Marco J W Quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3D late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods( ) |
title | Quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3D late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods( ) |
title_full | Quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3D late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods( ) |
title_fullStr | Quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3D late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods( ) |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3D late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods( ) |
title_short | Quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3D late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods( ) |
title_sort | quantification of left atrial fibrosis by 3d late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different analysis methods( ) |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35947873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeab245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hopmanluukhga quantificationofleftatrialfibrosisby3dlategadoliniumenhancedcardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithatrialfibrillationimpactofdifferentanalysismethods AT bhagirathpranav quantificationofleftatrialfibrosisby3dlategadoliniumenhancedcardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithatrialfibrillationimpactofdifferentanalysismethods AT muldermarkj quantificationofleftatrialfibrosisby3dlategadoliniumenhancedcardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithatrialfibrillationimpactofdifferentanalysismethods AT egginkirisn quantificationofleftatrialfibrosisby3dlategadoliniumenhancedcardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithatrialfibrillationimpactofdifferentanalysismethods AT vanrossumalbertc quantificationofleftatrialfibrosisby3dlategadoliniumenhancedcardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithatrialfibrillationimpactofdifferentanalysismethods AT allaartcornelisp quantificationofleftatrialfibrosisby3dlategadoliniumenhancedcardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithatrialfibrillationimpactofdifferentanalysismethods AT gottemarcojw quantificationofleftatrialfibrosisby3dlategadoliniumenhancedcardiacmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithatrialfibrillationimpactofdifferentanalysismethods |