Cargando…

Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice

PURPOSE: Primary analysis of VISION showed tepotinib had durable clinical activity in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present updated outcomes for clinically relevant subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II, open-label, multi-cohort study of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le, Xiuning, Sakai, Hiroshi, Felip, Enriqueta, Veillon, Remi, Garassino, Marina Chiara, Raskin, Jo, Cortot, Alexis B., Viteri, Santiago, Mazieres, Julien, Smit, Egbert F., Thomas, Michael, Iams, Wade T., Cho, Byoung Chul, Kim, Hye Ryun, Yang, James Chih-Hsin, Chen, Yuh-Min, Patel, Jyoti D., Bestvina, Christine M., Park, Keunchil, Griesinger, Frank, Johnson, Melissa, Gottfried, Maya, Britschgi, Christian, Heymach, John, Sikoglu, Elif, Berghoff, Karin, Schumacher, Karl-Maria, Bruns, Rolf, Otto, Gordon, Paik, Paul K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34789481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2733
_version_ 1784765330712690688
author Le, Xiuning
Sakai, Hiroshi
Felip, Enriqueta
Veillon, Remi
Garassino, Marina Chiara
Raskin, Jo
Cortot, Alexis B.
Viteri, Santiago
Mazieres, Julien
Smit, Egbert F.
Thomas, Michael
Iams, Wade T.
Cho, Byoung Chul
Kim, Hye Ryun
Yang, James Chih-Hsin
Chen, Yuh-Min
Patel, Jyoti D.
Bestvina, Christine M.
Park, Keunchil
Griesinger, Frank
Johnson, Melissa
Gottfried, Maya
Britschgi, Christian
Heymach, John
Sikoglu, Elif
Berghoff, Karin
Schumacher, Karl-Maria
Bruns, Rolf
Otto, Gordon
Paik, Paul K.
author_facet Le, Xiuning
Sakai, Hiroshi
Felip, Enriqueta
Veillon, Remi
Garassino, Marina Chiara
Raskin, Jo
Cortot, Alexis B.
Viteri, Santiago
Mazieres, Julien
Smit, Egbert F.
Thomas, Michael
Iams, Wade T.
Cho, Byoung Chul
Kim, Hye Ryun
Yang, James Chih-Hsin
Chen, Yuh-Min
Patel, Jyoti D.
Bestvina, Christine M.
Park, Keunchil
Griesinger, Frank
Johnson, Melissa
Gottfried, Maya
Britschgi, Christian
Heymach, John
Sikoglu, Elif
Berghoff, Karin
Schumacher, Karl-Maria
Bruns, Rolf
Otto, Gordon
Paik, Paul K.
author_sort Le, Xiuning
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Primary analysis of VISION showed tepotinib had durable clinical activity in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present updated outcomes for clinically relevant subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II, open-label, multi-cohort study of 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) tepotinib in patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC assessed efficacy and safety in predefined subgroups according to age, prior therapies (chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors), and brain metastases. An ad hoc retrospective analysis using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria assessed intracranial activity. RESULTS: 152 patients were evaluable for efficacy (median age: 73.1). Overall, objective response rate (ORR) was 44.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.7–53.0]. Patients aged <75 (n = 84) and ≥75 (n = 68) had ORRs of 48.8% (95% CI: 37.7–60.0) and 39.7% (95% CI: 28.0–52.3), respectively. Treatment-naïve (n = 69) versus previously treated (n = 83) patients showed consistent efficacy [ORR (95% CI): 44.9% (32.9–57.4) vs. 44.6% (33.7–55.9); median duration of response (95% CI): 10.8 (6.9–not estimable) vs. 11.1 (9.5–18.5) months]. Of 15 patients analyzed by RANO-BM (12 received prior radiotherapy), 13 achieved intracranial disease control; 5 of 7 patients with measurable brain metastases had partial intracranial responses. Of 255 patients evaluable for safety, 64 (25.1%) experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), leading to discontinuation in 27 patients (10.6%). Rates of adverse events (AE) were broadly consistent irrespective of prior therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Tepotinib showed meaningful activity across subgroups by age, prior therapies, and brain metastases, with a manageable safety profile and few treatment discontinuations. See related commentary by Rosner and Spira, p. 1055
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9365370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93653702023-01-05 Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice Le, Xiuning Sakai, Hiroshi Felip, Enriqueta Veillon, Remi Garassino, Marina Chiara Raskin, Jo Cortot, Alexis B. Viteri, Santiago Mazieres, Julien Smit, Egbert F. Thomas, Michael Iams, Wade T. Cho, Byoung Chul Kim, Hye Ryun Yang, James Chih-Hsin Chen, Yuh-Min Patel, Jyoti D. Bestvina, Christine M. Park, Keunchil Griesinger, Frank Johnson, Melissa Gottfried, Maya Britschgi, Christian Heymach, John Sikoglu, Elif Berghoff, Karin Schumacher, Karl-Maria Bruns, Rolf Otto, Gordon Paik, Paul K. Clin Cancer Res Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy PURPOSE: Primary analysis of VISION showed tepotinib had durable clinical activity in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present updated outcomes for clinically relevant subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II, open-label, multi-cohort study of 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) tepotinib in patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC assessed efficacy and safety in predefined subgroups according to age, prior therapies (chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors), and brain metastases. An ad hoc retrospective analysis using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria assessed intracranial activity. RESULTS: 152 patients were evaluable for efficacy (median age: 73.1). Overall, objective response rate (ORR) was 44.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.7–53.0]. Patients aged <75 (n = 84) and ≥75 (n = 68) had ORRs of 48.8% (95% CI: 37.7–60.0) and 39.7% (95% CI: 28.0–52.3), respectively. Treatment-naïve (n = 69) versus previously treated (n = 83) patients showed consistent efficacy [ORR (95% CI): 44.9% (32.9–57.4) vs. 44.6% (33.7–55.9); median duration of response (95% CI): 10.8 (6.9–not estimable) vs. 11.1 (9.5–18.5) months]. Of 15 patients analyzed by RANO-BM (12 received prior radiotherapy), 13 achieved intracranial disease control; 5 of 7 patients with measurable brain metastases had partial intracranial responses. Of 255 patients evaluable for safety, 64 (25.1%) experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), leading to discontinuation in 27 patients (10.6%). Rates of adverse events (AE) were broadly consistent irrespective of prior therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Tepotinib showed meaningful activity across subgroups by age, prior therapies, and brain metastases, with a manageable safety profile and few treatment discontinuations. See related commentary by Rosner and Spira, p. 1055 American Association for Cancer Research 2022-03-15 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9365370/ /pubmed/34789481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2733 Text en ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy
Le, Xiuning
Sakai, Hiroshi
Felip, Enriqueta
Veillon, Remi
Garassino, Marina Chiara
Raskin, Jo
Cortot, Alexis B.
Viteri, Santiago
Mazieres, Julien
Smit, Egbert F.
Thomas, Michael
Iams, Wade T.
Cho, Byoung Chul
Kim, Hye Ryun
Yang, James Chih-Hsin
Chen, Yuh-Min
Patel, Jyoti D.
Bestvina, Christine M.
Park, Keunchil
Griesinger, Frank
Johnson, Melissa
Gottfried, Maya
Britschgi, Christian
Heymach, John
Sikoglu, Elif
Berghoff, Karin
Schumacher, Karl-Maria
Bruns, Rolf
Otto, Gordon
Paik, Paul K.
Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice
title Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice
title_full Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice
title_short Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice
title_sort tepotinib efficacy and safety in patients with met exon 14 skipping nsclc: outcomes in patient subgroups from the vision study with relevance for clinical practice
topic Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34789481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2733
work_keys_str_mv AT lexiuning tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT sakaihiroshi tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT felipenriqueta tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT veillonremi tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT garassinomarinachiara tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT raskinjo tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT cortotalexisb tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT viterisantiago tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT mazieresjulien tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT smitegbertf tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT thomasmichael tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT iamswadet tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT chobyoungchul tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT kimhyeryun tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT yangjameschihhsin tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT chenyuhmin tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT pateljyotid tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT bestvinachristinem tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT parkkeunchil tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT griesingerfrank tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT johnsonmelissa tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT gottfriedmaya tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT britschgichristian tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT heymachjohn tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT sikogluelif tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT berghoffkarin tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT schumacherkarlmaria tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT brunsrolf tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT ottogordon tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice
AT paikpaulk tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice