Cargando…
Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice
PURPOSE: Primary analysis of VISION showed tepotinib had durable clinical activity in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present updated outcomes for clinically relevant subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II, open-label, multi-cohort study of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for Cancer Research
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34789481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2733 |
_version_ | 1784765330712690688 |
---|---|
author | Le, Xiuning Sakai, Hiroshi Felip, Enriqueta Veillon, Remi Garassino, Marina Chiara Raskin, Jo Cortot, Alexis B. Viteri, Santiago Mazieres, Julien Smit, Egbert F. Thomas, Michael Iams, Wade T. Cho, Byoung Chul Kim, Hye Ryun Yang, James Chih-Hsin Chen, Yuh-Min Patel, Jyoti D. Bestvina, Christine M. Park, Keunchil Griesinger, Frank Johnson, Melissa Gottfried, Maya Britschgi, Christian Heymach, John Sikoglu, Elif Berghoff, Karin Schumacher, Karl-Maria Bruns, Rolf Otto, Gordon Paik, Paul K. |
author_facet | Le, Xiuning Sakai, Hiroshi Felip, Enriqueta Veillon, Remi Garassino, Marina Chiara Raskin, Jo Cortot, Alexis B. Viteri, Santiago Mazieres, Julien Smit, Egbert F. Thomas, Michael Iams, Wade T. Cho, Byoung Chul Kim, Hye Ryun Yang, James Chih-Hsin Chen, Yuh-Min Patel, Jyoti D. Bestvina, Christine M. Park, Keunchil Griesinger, Frank Johnson, Melissa Gottfried, Maya Britschgi, Christian Heymach, John Sikoglu, Elif Berghoff, Karin Schumacher, Karl-Maria Bruns, Rolf Otto, Gordon Paik, Paul K. |
author_sort | Le, Xiuning |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Primary analysis of VISION showed tepotinib had durable clinical activity in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present updated outcomes for clinically relevant subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II, open-label, multi-cohort study of 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) tepotinib in patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC assessed efficacy and safety in predefined subgroups according to age, prior therapies (chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors), and brain metastases. An ad hoc retrospective analysis using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria assessed intracranial activity. RESULTS: 152 patients were evaluable for efficacy (median age: 73.1). Overall, objective response rate (ORR) was 44.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.7–53.0]. Patients aged <75 (n = 84) and ≥75 (n = 68) had ORRs of 48.8% (95% CI: 37.7–60.0) and 39.7% (95% CI: 28.0–52.3), respectively. Treatment-naïve (n = 69) versus previously treated (n = 83) patients showed consistent efficacy [ORR (95% CI): 44.9% (32.9–57.4) vs. 44.6% (33.7–55.9); median duration of response (95% CI): 10.8 (6.9–not estimable) vs. 11.1 (9.5–18.5) months]. Of 15 patients analyzed by RANO-BM (12 received prior radiotherapy), 13 achieved intracranial disease control; 5 of 7 patients with measurable brain metastases had partial intracranial responses. Of 255 patients evaluable for safety, 64 (25.1%) experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), leading to discontinuation in 27 patients (10.6%). Rates of adverse events (AE) were broadly consistent irrespective of prior therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Tepotinib showed meaningful activity across subgroups by age, prior therapies, and brain metastases, with a manageable safety profile and few treatment discontinuations. See related commentary by Rosner and Spira, p. 1055 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9365370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Association for Cancer Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93653702023-01-05 Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice Le, Xiuning Sakai, Hiroshi Felip, Enriqueta Veillon, Remi Garassino, Marina Chiara Raskin, Jo Cortot, Alexis B. Viteri, Santiago Mazieres, Julien Smit, Egbert F. Thomas, Michael Iams, Wade T. Cho, Byoung Chul Kim, Hye Ryun Yang, James Chih-Hsin Chen, Yuh-Min Patel, Jyoti D. Bestvina, Christine M. Park, Keunchil Griesinger, Frank Johnson, Melissa Gottfried, Maya Britschgi, Christian Heymach, John Sikoglu, Elif Berghoff, Karin Schumacher, Karl-Maria Bruns, Rolf Otto, Gordon Paik, Paul K. Clin Cancer Res Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy PURPOSE: Primary analysis of VISION showed tepotinib had durable clinical activity in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present updated outcomes for clinically relevant subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II, open-label, multi-cohort study of 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) tepotinib in patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC assessed efficacy and safety in predefined subgroups according to age, prior therapies (chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors), and brain metastases. An ad hoc retrospective analysis using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria assessed intracranial activity. RESULTS: 152 patients were evaluable for efficacy (median age: 73.1). Overall, objective response rate (ORR) was 44.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.7–53.0]. Patients aged <75 (n = 84) and ≥75 (n = 68) had ORRs of 48.8% (95% CI: 37.7–60.0) and 39.7% (95% CI: 28.0–52.3), respectively. Treatment-naïve (n = 69) versus previously treated (n = 83) patients showed consistent efficacy [ORR (95% CI): 44.9% (32.9–57.4) vs. 44.6% (33.7–55.9); median duration of response (95% CI): 10.8 (6.9–not estimable) vs. 11.1 (9.5–18.5) months]. Of 15 patients analyzed by RANO-BM (12 received prior radiotherapy), 13 achieved intracranial disease control; 5 of 7 patients with measurable brain metastases had partial intracranial responses. Of 255 patients evaluable for safety, 64 (25.1%) experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), leading to discontinuation in 27 patients (10.6%). Rates of adverse events (AE) were broadly consistent irrespective of prior therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Tepotinib showed meaningful activity across subgroups by age, prior therapies, and brain metastases, with a manageable safety profile and few treatment discontinuations. See related commentary by Rosner and Spira, p. 1055 American Association for Cancer Research 2022-03-15 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9365370/ /pubmed/34789481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2733 Text en ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy Le, Xiuning Sakai, Hiroshi Felip, Enriqueta Veillon, Remi Garassino, Marina Chiara Raskin, Jo Cortot, Alexis B. Viteri, Santiago Mazieres, Julien Smit, Egbert F. Thomas, Michael Iams, Wade T. Cho, Byoung Chul Kim, Hye Ryun Yang, James Chih-Hsin Chen, Yuh-Min Patel, Jyoti D. Bestvina, Christine M. Park, Keunchil Griesinger, Frank Johnson, Melissa Gottfried, Maya Britschgi, Christian Heymach, John Sikoglu, Elif Berghoff, Karin Schumacher, Karl-Maria Bruns, Rolf Otto, Gordon Paik, Paul K. Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice |
title | Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice |
title_full | Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice |
title_fullStr | Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice |
title_short | Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice |
title_sort | tepotinib efficacy and safety in patients with met exon 14 skipping nsclc: outcomes in patient subgroups from the vision study with relevance for clinical practice |
topic | Clinical Trials: Targeted Therapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365370/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34789481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2733 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lexiuning tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT sakaihiroshi tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT felipenriqueta tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT veillonremi tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT garassinomarinachiara tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT raskinjo tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT cortotalexisb tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT viterisantiago tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT mazieresjulien tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT smitegbertf tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT thomasmichael tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT iamswadet tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT chobyoungchul tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT kimhyeryun tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT yangjameschihhsin tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT chenyuhmin tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT pateljyotid tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT bestvinachristinem tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT parkkeunchil tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT griesingerfrank tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT johnsonmelissa tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT gottfriedmaya tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT britschgichristian tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT heymachjohn tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT sikogluelif tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT berghoffkarin tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT schumacherkarlmaria tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT brunsrolf tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT ottogordon tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice AT paikpaulk tepotinibefficacyandsafetyinpatientswithmetexon14skippingnsclcoutcomesinpatientsubgroupsfromthevisionstudywithrelevanceforclinicalpractice |