Cargando…

Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability

Objective  To evaluate the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss with the recurrence dislocation rate and the Rowe score. Methods  Retrospective study that assessed the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients undergoing prima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto, Lobo, Frederico Lafraia, Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli, Assunção, Jorge Henrique, Andrade-Silva, Fernando Brandão de, Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741022
_version_ 1784765348788043776
author Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto
Lobo, Frederico Lafraia
Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli
Assunção, Jorge Henrique
Andrade-Silva, Fernando Brandão de
Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado
author_facet Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto
Lobo, Frederico Lafraia
Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli
Assunção, Jorge Henrique
Andrade-Silva, Fernando Brandão de
Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado
author_sort Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto
collection PubMed
description Objective  To evaluate the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss with the recurrence dislocation rate and the Rowe score. Methods  Retrospective study that assessed the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients undergoing primary arthroscopic repair of anterior Bankart were included. Patients with glenoidal bone loss greater than 21%, rotator cuff tear, scapular waist fracture, and posterior or multidirectional instability were not included. Rowe score were the primary outcome, and the recurrence rate was the secondary outcome. Results  One hundred and two patients were included. Postoperative recurrent instability was reported by 8 patients (7.8%). Four patients (50%) in the group with recurrence presented glenoidal bone loss greater than 13.5% against 24 (25.5%) in the group without recurrence ( p  = 0.210), with a negative predictive value of 94.6%. Three patients (37.5%) in the recurrence group were considered off-track, against 13 (13.8%) in the group without recurrence ( p  = 0.109), with a negative predictive value of 94.2%. Patients with absolute glenoid track value ≤ 1.5 mm had worse results in relation to the recurrence group, with 6 patients (75%) presenting recurrence ( p  = 0.003). Conclusion  Off-track injury and glenoidal bone loss greater than the subcritical are not related to the recurrence rate and Rowe score, despite the high negative predictive value. The cut of the absolute value of the glenoid track at 1.5 mm had a significant relationship with the recurrence rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9365485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93654852022-08-11 Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto Lobo, Frederico Lafraia Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli Assunção, Jorge Henrique Andrade-Silva, Fernando Brandão de Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective  To evaluate the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss with the recurrence dislocation rate and the Rowe score. Methods  Retrospective study that assessed the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients undergoing primary arthroscopic repair of anterior Bankart were included. Patients with glenoidal bone loss greater than 21%, rotator cuff tear, scapular waist fracture, and posterior or multidirectional instability were not included. Rowe score were the primary outcome, and the recurrence rate was the secondary outcome. Results  One hundred and two patients were included. Postoperative recurrent instability was reported by 8 patients (7.8%). Four patients (50%) in the group with recurrence presented glenoidal bone loss greater than 13.5% against 24 (25.5%) in the group without recurrence ( p  = 0.210), with a negative predictive value of 94.6%. Three patients (37.5%) in the recurrence group were considered off-track, against 13 (13.8%) in the group without recurrence ( p  = 0.109), with a negative predictive value of 94.2%. Patients with absolute glenoid track value ≤ 1.5 mm had worse results in relation to the recurrence group, with 6 patients (75%) presenting recurrence ( p  = 0.003). Conclusion  Off-track injury and glenoidal bone loss greater than the subcritical are not related to the recurrence rate and Rowe score, despite the high negative predictive value. The cut of the absolute value of the glenoid track at 1.5 mm had a significant relationship with the recurrence rate. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9365485/ /pubmed/35966420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741022 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto
Lobo, Frederico Lafraia
Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli
Assunção, Jorge Henrique
Andrade-Silva, Fernando Brandão de
Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability
title Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability
title_full Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability
title_fullStr Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability
title_short Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability
title_sort clinical validation of the glenoid track concept in anterior glenohumeral instability
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741022
work_keys_str_mv AT gracitellimauroemilioconforto clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability
AT lobofredericolafraia clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability
AT malavoltaeduardoangeli clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability
AT assuncaojorgehenrique clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability
AT andradesilvafernandobrandaode clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability
AT ferreiranetoarnaldoamado clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability