Cargando…
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability
Objective To evaluate the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss with the recurrence dislocation rate and the Rowe score. Methods Retrospective study that assessed the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients undergoing prima...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741022 |
_version_ | 1784765348788043776 |
---|---|
author | Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto Lobo, Frederico Lafraia Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli Assunção, Jorge Henrique Andrade-Silva, Fernando Brandão de Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado |
author_facet | Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto Lobo, Frederico Lafraia Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli Assunção, Jorge Henrique Andrade-Silva, Fernando Brandão de Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado |
author_sort | Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To evaluate the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss with the recurrence dislocation rate and the Rowe score. Methods Retrospective study that assessed the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients undergoing primary arthroscopic repair of anterior Bankart were included. Patients with glenoidal bone loss greater than 21%, rotator cuff tear, scapular waist fracture, and posterior or multidirectional instability were not included. Rowe score were the primary outcome, and the recurrence rate was the secondary outcome. Results One hundred and two patients were included. Postoperative recurrent instability was reported by 8 patients (7.8%). Four patients (50%) in the group with recurrence presented glenoidal bone loss greater than 13.5% against 24 (25.5%) in the group without recurrence ( p = 0.210), with a negative predictive value of 94.6%. Three patients (37.5%) in the recurrence group were considered off-track, against 13 (13.8%) in the group without recurrence ( p = 0.109), with a negative predictive value of 94.2%. Patients with absolute glenoid track value ≤ 1.5 mm had worse results in relation to the recurrence group, with 6 patients (75%) presenting recurrence ( p = 0.003). Conclusion Off-track injury and glenoidal bone loss greater than the subcritical are not related to the recurrence rate and Rowe score, despite the high negative predictive value. The cut of the absolute value of the glenoid track at 1.5 mm had a significant relationship with the recurrence rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9365485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93654852022-08-11 Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto Lobo, Frederico Lafraia Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli Assunção, Jorge Henrique Andrade-Silva, Fernando Brandão de Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective To evaluate the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss with the recurrence dislocation rate and the Rowe score. Methods Retrospective study that assessed the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients undergoing primary arthroscopic repair of anterior Bankart were included. Patients with glenoidal bone loss greater than 21%, rotator cuff tear, scapular waist fracture, and posterior or multidirectional instability were not included. Rowe score were the primary outcome, and the recurrence rate was the secondary outcome. Results One hundred and two patients were included. Postoperative recurrent instability was reported by 8 patients (7.8%). Four patients (50%) in the group with recurrence presented glenoidal bone loss greater than 13.5% against 24 (25.5%) in the group without recurrence ( p = 0.210), with a negative predictive value of 94.6%. Three patients (37.5%) in the recurrence group were considered off-track, against 13 (13.8%) in the group without recurrence ( p = 0.109), with a negative predictive value of 94.2%. Patients with absolute glenoid track value ≤ 1.5 mm had worse results in relation to the recurrence group, with 6 patients (75%) presenting recurrence ( p = 0.003). Conclusion Off-track injury and glenoidal bone loss greater than the subcritical are not related to the recurrence rate and Rowe score, despite the high negative predictive value. The cut of the absolute value of the glenoid track at 1.5 mm had a significant relationship with the recurrence rate. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9365485/ /pubmed/35966420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741022 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto Lobo, Frederico Lafraia Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli Assunção, Jorge Henrique Andrade-Silva, Fernando Brandão de Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title | Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title_full | Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title_fullStr | Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title_short | Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title_sort | clinical validation of the glenoid track concept in anterior glenohumeral instability |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gracitellimauroemilioconforto clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability AT lobofredericolafraia clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability AT malavoltaeduardoangeli clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability AT assuncaojorgehenrique clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability AT andradesilvafernandobrandaode clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability AT ferreiranetoarnaldoamado clinicalvalidationoftheglenoidtrackconceptinanteriorglenohumeralinstability |