Cargando…

Effect of Different Ankle-Foot Immobility on Lateral Gait Stability in the Stance Phase

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the effect of limited foot and ankle mobility on the lateral stability of gait through the observation of the mediolateral margin of stability and related kinematic parameters. METHODS: Thirty young, healthy participants walked at a fixed gait velocity on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Wen, Hatanaka, Yasuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7135040
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the effect of limited foot and ankle mobility on the lateral stability of gait through the observation of the mediolateral margin of stability and related kinematic parameters. METHODS: Thirty young, healthy participants walked at a fixed gait velocity on a level surface. Participants achieved different degrees of restricted mobility by wearing soft-soled shoes (S), an ankle-foot orthosis with unrestricted dorsiflexion-plantarflexion activity only (A), and an ankle-foot orthosis with unrestricted dorsiflexion-plantarflexion and adjustable horizontal rotation of the foot (OU/OR). Furthermore, the spatiotemporal parameters, mediolateral margin of stability, center of pressure, angle of the fore and hind foot relative to the tibia, and correlation coefficients of the factors were analyzed. Regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS: At right heel strike, group A had a significantly lower mediolateral margin of stability than group S and group OU. Meanwhile, forefoot adduction (0.2 < |r| <0.4) and plantarflexion (0.2 < |r| <0.4), as well as hindfoot internal rotation (0.2 < |r| <0.6) and inversion (0.2 < |r| <0.4), correlated negatively with lateral stability. Regression analysis revealed forefoot dorsiflexion and supination were the main independent variables for group A. At right heel off, groups OU and OR had a significantly lower mediolateral margin of stability than those in groups A and S. Forefoot adduction (0.2 < |r| <0.4) and dorsiflexion (0.4 < |r| <0.6) were correlated with lateral stability, as were hindfoot dorsiflexion (0.2 < |r| <0.4) and inversion (0.2 < |r| <0.4). Regression analysis revealed forefoot abduction and plantarflexion were the main independent variables for groups OU and OR. CONCLUSIONS: The present study verified from gait data that forefoot dorsiflexion and supination at the initial contact of the stance phase were relevant factors for the differences in lateral gait stability, whereas abduction and plantar flexion of the forefoot at the terminal stance phase were the main influencing factors of lateral gait stability.