Cargando…

Comparison of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis and Billroth-II reconstructions after distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to make a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis on the clinical application of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis (GJPA) and Billroth-II anastomosis after distal gastrectomy. METHODS: We collected clinical data from 249 patients who received distal gastrectomy from January...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Guangyu, Cheng, Long, Liu, Liye, Luo, Guode, Li, Ming, Wen, Yi, Wang, Tao, Cao, Yongkuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36017143
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2022.103.2.81
_version_ 1784765385385443328
author Chen, Guangyu
Cheng, Long
Liu, Liye
Luo, Guode
Li, Ming
Wen, Yi
Wang, Tao
Cao, Yongkuan
author_facet Chen, Guangyu
Cheng, Long
Liu, Liye
Luo, Guode
Li, Ming
Wen, Yi
Wang, Tao
Cao, Yongkuan
author_sort Chen, Guangyu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Our study aimed to make a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis on the clinical application of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis (GJPA) and Billroth-II anastomosis after distal gastrectomy. METHODS: We collected clinical data from 249 patients who received distal gastrectomy from January 2016 to July 2020. According to the reconstruction method used, all patients were divided into the Billroth-II group and the GJPA group. Clinical data and operation complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable after PSM. In the Billroth-II group, the incidence rate of delayed gastric emptying was higher than that in the GJPA group. Fewer patients suffered reflux gastritis in the GJPA group. The RGB (residue, gastritis, and bile) scores related to the severity of bile reflux into the remnant stomach, gastritis, and residue were higher in the Billroth-II group. Postoperative nutritional status and Visick classification demonstrated that postoperative subjective feelings in the GJPA group were improved significantly. CONCLUSION: The application of GJPA in reconstruction after distal gastrectomy is safe, economical, and reliable. This reconstruction improved the quality of life of patients. It is worth popularizing widely in clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9365644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93656442022-08-24 Comparison of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis and Billroth-II reconstructions after distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis Chen, Guangyu Cheng, Long Liu, Liye Luo, Guode Li, Ming Wen, Yi Wang, Tao Cao, Yongkuan Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Our study aimed to make a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis on the clinical application of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis (GJPA) and Billroth-II anastomosis after distal gastrectomy. METHODS: We collected clinical data from 249 patients who received distal gastrectomy from January 2016 to July 2020. According to the reconstruction method used, all patients were divided into the Billroth-II group and the GJPA group. Clinical data and operation complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable after PSM. In the Billroth-II group, the incidence rate of delayed gastric emptying was higher than that in the GJPA group. Fewer patients suffered reflux gastritis in the GJPA group. The RGB (residue, gastritis, and bile) scores related to the severity of bile reflux into the remnant stomach, gastritis, and residue were higher in the Billroth-II group. Postoperative nutritional status and Visick classification demonstrated that postoperative subjective feelings in the GJPA group were improved significantly. CONCLUSION: The application of GJPA in reconstruction after distal gastrectomy is safe, economical, and reliable. This reconstruction improved the quality of life of patients. It is worth popularizing widely in clinical settings. The Korean Surgical Society 2022-08 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9365644/ /pubmed/36017143 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2022.103.2.81 Text en Copyright © 2022, the Korean Surgical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Guangyu
Cheng, Long
Liu, Liye
Luo, Guode
Li, Ming
Wen, Yi
Wang, Tao
Cao, Yongkuan
Comparison of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis and Billroth-II reconstructions after distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis
title Comparison of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis and Billroth-II reconstructions after distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis
title_full Comparison of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis and Billroth-II reconstructions after distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis and Billroth-II reconstructions after distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis and Billroth-II reconstructions after distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis
title_short Comparison of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis and Billroth-II reconstructions after distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis
title_sort comparison of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis and billroth-ii reconstructions after distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36017143
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2022.103.2.81
work_keys_str_mv AT chenguangyu comparisonofgastricjejunumpouchanastomosisandbillrothiireconstructionsafterdistalgastrectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT chenglong comparisonofgastricjejunumpouchanastomosisandbillrothiireconstructionsafterdistalgastrectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT liuliye comparisonofgastricjejunumpouchanastomosisandbillrothiireconstructionsafterdistalgastrectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT luoguode comparisonofgastricjejunumpouchanastomosisandbillrothiireconstructionsafterdistalgastrectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT liming comparisonofgastricjejunumpouchanastomosisandbillrothiireconstructionsafterdistalgastrectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT wenyi comparisonofgastricjejunumpouchanastomosisandbillrothiireconstructionsafterdistalgastrectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT wangtao comparisonofgastricjejunumpouchanastomosisandbillrothiireconstructionsafterdistalgastrectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT caoyongkuan comparisonofgastricjejunumpouchanastomosisandbillrothiireconstructionsafterdistalgastrectomyapropensityscorematchinganalysis