Cargando…

Preliminary psychometric properties of a standard vocabulary test administered using a non-invasive brain-computer interface

OBJECTIVE: To examine measurement agreement between a vocabulary test that is administered in the standardized manner and a version that is administered with a brain-computer interface (BCI). METHOD: The sample was comprised of 21 participants, ages 9–27, mean age 16.7 (5.4) years, 61.9% male, inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warschausky, Seth, Huggins, Jane E., Alcaide-Aguirre, Ramses Eduardo, Aref, Abdulrahman W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966998
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.930433
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To examine measurement agreement between a vocabulary test that is administered in the standardized manner and a version that is administered with a brain-computer interface (BCI). METHOD: The sample was comprised of 21 participants, ages 9–27, mean age 16.7 (5.4) years, 61.9% male, including 10 with congenital spastic cerebral palsy (CP), and 11 comparison peers. Participants completed both standard and BCI-facilitated alternate versions of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - 4 (PPVT™-4). The BCI-facilitated PPVT-4 uses items identical to the unmodified PPVT-4, but each quadrant forced-choice item is presented on a computer screen for use with the BCI. RESULTS: Measurement agreement between instruments was excellent, including an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.98, and Bland-Altman plots and tests indicating adequate limits of agreement and no systematic test version bias. The mean standard score difference between test versions was 2.0 points (SD 6.3). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that BCI-facilitated quadrant forced-choice vocabulary testing has the potential to measure aspects of language without requiring any overt physical or communicative response. Thus, it may be possible to identify the language capabilities and needs of many individuals who have not had access to standardized clinical and research instruments.