Cargando…

Cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: Biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact

Low technological knowledge in production chains, global climate change, and misinformation are concrete threats to food security. In addition, these combined threats also trigger ecological instability in megadiverse areas of the world, especially in some cacao-producing countries in South America,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaimes-Suárez, Yeirme Y., Carvajal-Rivera, Albert S., Galvis-Neira, Donald A., Carvalho, Fabricio E. L., Rojas-Molina, Jairo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.921469
_version_ 1784765462655008768
author Jaimes-Suárez, Yeirme Y.
Carvajal-Rivera, Albert S.
Galvis-Neira, Donald A.
Carvalho, Fabricio E. L.
Rojas-Molina, Jairo
author_facet Jaimes-Suárez, Yeirme Y.
Carvajal-Rivera, Albert S.
Galvis-Neira, Donald A.
Carvalho, Fabricio E. L.
Rojas-Molina, Jairo
author_sort Jaimes-Suárez, Yeirme Y.
collection PubMed
description Low technological knowledge in production chains, global climate change, and misinformation are concrete threats to food security. In addition, these combined threats also trigger ecological instability in megadiverse areas of the world, especially in some cacao-producing countries in South America, where this crop plays an important socio-economic role, even being used to replace illicit crops. Accordingly, the use of agroforestry systems approaches has emerged as a good alternative to maintain productivity, add high-value commodities to producers, and provide important ecosystem services for sustainable agriculture. However, limitations associated with the competition for resources between the species composing the system, and the higher incidence of some diseases, have led many producers to abandon this strategy, opting for monoculture. In this review, we seek to gather the main information available in the literature, aiming to answer the question: what is the real scientific evidence that supports the benefits and harms of adopting agroforestry systems in cacao production? We seek to make critical scrutiny of the possible negative effects of certain associations of the agroforestry system with biotic and abiotic stress in cacao. Here, we review the possible competition for light and nutrients and discuss the main characteristics to be sought in cacao genotypes to optimize these inter-specific relationships. In addition, we review the research advances that show the behavior of the main cacao diseases (Witch’s broom disease, frosty pod rot, black pod rot) in models of agroforestry systems contrasted with monoculture, as well as the optimization of agronomic practices to reduce some of these stresses. This compendium, therefore, sheds light on a major gap in establishing truly sustainable agriculture, which has been treated much more from the perspective of negative stigma than from the real technological advantages that can be combined to the benefit of a balanced ecosystem with generating income for farmers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9366013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93660132022-08-12 Cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: Biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact Jaimes-Suárez, Yeirme Y. Carvajal-Rivera, Albert S. Galvis-Neira, Donald A. Carvalho, Fabricio E. L. Rojas-Molina, Jairo Front Plant Sci Plant Science Low technological knowledge in production chains, global climate change, and misinformation are concrete threats to food security. In addition, these combined threats also trigger ecological instability in megadiverse areas of the world, especially in some cacao-producing countries in South America, where this crop plays an important socio-economic role, even being used to replace illicit crops. Accordingly, the use of agroforestry systems approaches has emerged as a good alternative to maintain productivity, add high-value commodities to producers, and provide important ecosystem services for sustainable agriculture. However, limitations associated with the competition for resources between the species composing the system, and the higher incidence of some diseases, have led many producers to abandon this strategy, opting for monoculture. In this review, we seek to gather the main information available in the literature, aiming to answer the question: what is the real scientific evidence that supports the benefits and harms of adopting agroforestry systems in cacao production? We seek to make critical scrutiny of the possible negative effects of certain associations of the agroforestry system with biotic and abiotic stress in cacao. Here, we review the possible competition for light and nutrients and discuss the main characteristics to be sought in cacao genotypes to optimize these inter-specific relationships. In addition, we review the research advances that show the behavior of the main cacao diseases (Witch’s broom disease, frosty pod rot, black pod rot) in models of agroforestry systems contrasted with monoculture, as well as the optimization of agronomic practices to reduce some of these stresses. This compendium, therefore, sheds light on a major gap in establishing truly sustainable agriculture, which has been treated much more from the perspective of negative stigma than from the real technological advantages that can be combined to the benefit of a balanced ecosystem with generating income for farmers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9366013/ /pubmed/35968107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.921469 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jaimes-Suárez, Carvajal-Rivera, Galvis-Neira, Carvalho and Rojas-Molina. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Jaimes-Suárez, Yeirme Y.
Carvajal-Rivera, Albert S.
Galvis-Neira, Donald A.
Carvalho, Fabricio E. L.
Rojas-Molina, Jairo
Cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: Biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact
title Cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: Biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact
title_full Cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: Biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact
title_fullStr Cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: Biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact
title_full_unstemmed Cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: Biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact
title_short Cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: Biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact
title_sort cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35968107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.921469
work_keys_str_mv AT jaimessuarezyeirmey cacaoagroforestrysystemsbeyondthestigmasbioticandabioticstressincidenceimpact
AT carvajalriveraalberts cacaoagroforestrysystemsbeyondthestigmasbioticandabioticstressincidenceimpact
AT galvisneiradonalda cacaoagroforestrysystemsbeyondthestigmasbioticandabioticstressincidenceimpact
AT carvalhofabricioel cacaoagroforestrysystemsbeyondthestigmasbioticandabioticstressincidenceimpact
AT rojasmolinajairo cacaoagroforestrysystemsbeyondthestigmasbioticandabioticstressincidenceimpact