Cargando…
A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction
BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a major cause of heart failure. Left ventricular adverse remodeling is common post-MI. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between reduced myocardial strain and the development of adverse remodeling. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with fast-str...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.949440 |
_version_ | 1784765521591271424 |
---|---|
author | El-Saadi, Walid Engvall, Jan Edvin Alfredsson, Joakim Karlsson, Jan-Erik Martins, Marcelo Sederholm, Sofia Faisal Zaman, Shaikh Ebbers, Tino Kihlberg, Johan |
author_facet | El-Saadi, Walid Engvall, Jan Edvin Alfredsson, Joakim Karlsson, Jan-Erik Martins, Marcelo Sederholm, Sofia Faisal Zaman, Shaikh Ebbers, Tino Kihlberg, Johan |
author_sort | El-Saadi, Walid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a major cause of heart failure. Left ventricular adverse remodeling is common post-MI. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between reduced myocardial strain and the development of adverse remodeling. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with fast-strain encoding (fast-SENC) or feature tracking (FT) enables rapid assessment of myocardial deformation. The aim of this study was to establish a head-to-head comparison of fast-SENC and FT in post-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, with clinical 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2DEcho) as a reference. METHODS: Thirty patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI were investigated. All participants underwent CMR examination with late gadolinium enhancement, cine-loop steady-state free precession, and fast-SENC imaging using a 1.5T scanner as well as a 2DEcho. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), segmental longitudinal strain (SLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and segmental circumferential strain (SCS) were assessed along with the MI scar extent. RESULTS: The GCS measurements from fast-SENC and FT were nearly identical: the mean difference was 0.01 (2.5)% (95% CI – 0.92 to 0.95). For GLS, fast-SENC values were higher than FT, with a mean difference of 1.8 (1.4)% (95% CI 1.31–2.35). Tests of significance for GLS did not show any differences between the MR methods and 2DEcho. Average strain in the infarct-related artery (IRA) segments compared to the remote myocardium was significantly lower for the left anterior descending artery and right coronary artery culprits but not for the left circumflex artery culprits. Fast-SENC displayed a higher area under the curve for detecting infarcted segments than FT for both SCS and SLS. CONCLUSION: GLS and GCS did not significantly differ between fast-SENC and FT. Both showed acceptable agreement with 2DEcho for longitudinal strain. Segments perfused by the IRA showed significantly reduced strain values compared to the remote myocardium. Fast-SENC presented a higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting infarcted segments than FT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9366255 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93662552022-08-12 A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction El-Saadi, Walid Engvall, Jan Edvin Alfredsson, Joakim Karlsson, Jan-Erik Martins, Marcelo Sederholm, Sofia Faisal Zaman, Shaikh Ebbers, Tino Kihlberg, Johan Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a major cause of heart failure. Left ventricular adverse remodeling is common post-MI. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between reduced myocardial strain and the development of adverse remodeling. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with fast-strain encoding (fast-SENC) or feature tracking (FT) enables rapid assessment of myocardial deformation. The aim of this study was to establish a head-to-head comparison of fast-SENC and FT in post-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, with clinical 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2DEcho) as a reference. METHODS: Thirty patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI were investigated. All participants underwent CMR examination with late gadolinium enhancement, cine-loop steady-state free precession, and fast-SENC imaging using a 1.5T scanner as well as a 2DEcho. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), segmental longitudinal strain (SLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and segmental circumferential strain (SCS) were assessed along with the MI scar extent. RESULTS: The GCS measurements from fast-SENC and FT were nearly identical: the mean difference was 0.01 (2.5)% (95% CI – 0.92 to 0.95). For GLS, fast-SENC values were higher than FT, with a mean difference of 1.8 (1.4)% (95% CI 1.31–2.35). Tests of significance for GLS did not show any differences between the MR methods and 2DEcho. Average strain in the infarct-related artery (IRA) segments compared to the remote myocardium was significantly lower for the left anterior descending artery and right coronary artery culprits but not for the left circumflex artery culprits. Fast-SENC displayed a higher area under the curve for detecting infarcted segments than FT for both SCS and SLS. CONCLUSION: GLS and GCS did not significantly differ between fast-SENC and FT. Both showed acceptable agreement with 2DEcho for longitudinal strain. Segments perfused by the IRA showed significantly reduced strain values compared to the remote myocardium. Fast-SENC presented a higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting infarcted segments than FT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9366255/ /pubmed/35966533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.949440 Text en Copyright © 2022 El-Saadi, Engvall, Alfredsson, Karlsson, Martins, Sederholm, Faisal Zaman, Ebbers and Kihlberg. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine El-Saadi, Walid Engvall, Jan Edvin Alfredsson, Joakim Karlsson, Jan-Erik Martins, Marcelo Sederholm, Sofia Faisal Zaman, Shaikh Ebbers, Tino Kihlberg, Johan A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction |
title | A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction |
title_full | A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction |
title_fullStr | A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction |
title_short | A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction |
title_sort | head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.949440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elsaadiwalid aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT engvalljanedvin aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT alfredssonjoakim aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT karlssonjanerik aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT martinsmarcelo aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT sederholmsofia aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT faisalzamanshaikh aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT ebberstino aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT kihlbergjohan aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT elsaadiwalid headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT engvalljanedvin headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT alfredssonjoakim headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT karlssonjanerik headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT martinsmarcelo headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT sederholmsofia headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT faisalzamanshaikh headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT ebberstino headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction AT kihlbergjohan headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction |