Cargando…

A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a major cause of heart failure. Left ventricular adverse remodeling is common post-MI. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between reduced myocardial strain and the development of adverse remodeling. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with fast-str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Saadi, Walid, Engvall, Jan Edvin, Alfredsson, Joakim, Karlsson, Jan-Erik, Martins, Marcelo, Sederholm, Sofia, Faisal Zaman, Shaikh, Ebbers, Tino, Kihlberg, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966533
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.949440
_version_ 1784765521591271424
author El-Saadi, Walid
Engvall, Jan Edvin
Alfredsson, Joakim
Karlsson, Jan-Erik
Martins, Marcelo
Sederholm, Sofia
Faisal Zaman, Shaikh
Ebbers, Tino
Kihlberg, Johan
author_facet El-Saadi, Walid
Engvall, Jan Edvin
Alfredsson, Joakim
Karlsson, Jan-Erik
Martins, Marcelo
Sederholm, Sofia
Faisal Zaman, Shaikh
Ebbers, Tino
Kihlberg, Johan
author_sort El-Saadi, Walid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a major cause of heart failure. Left ventricular adverse remodeling is common post-MI. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between reduced myocardial strain and the development of adverse remodeling. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with fast-strain encoding (fast-SENC) or feature tracking (FT) enables rapid assessment of myocardial deformation. The aim of this study was to establish a head-to-head comparison of fast-SENC and FT in post-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, with clinical 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2DEcho) as a reference. METHODS: Thirty patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI were investigated. All participants underwent CMR examination with late gadolinium enhancement, cine-loop steady-state free precession, and fast-SENC imaging using a 1.5T scanner as well as a 2DEcho. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), segmental longitudinal strain (SLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and segmental circumferential strain (SCS) were assessed along with the MI scar extent. RESULTS: The GCS measurements from fast-SENC and FT were nearly identical: the mean difference was 0.01 (2.5)% (95% CI – 0.92 to 0.95). For GLS, fast-SENC values were higher than FT, with a mean difference of 1.8 (1.4)% (95% CI 1.31–2.35). Tests of significance for GLS did not show any differences between the MR methods and 2DEcho. Average strain in the infarct-related artery (IRA) segments compared to the remote myocardium was significantly lower for the left anterior descending artery and right coronary artery culprits but not for the left circumflex artery culprits. Fast-SENC displayed a higher area under the curve for detecting infarcted segments than FT for both SCS and SLS. CONCLUSION: GLS and GCS did not significantly differ between fast-SENC and FT. Both showed acceptable agreement with 2DEcho for longitudinal strain. Segments perfused by the IRA showed significantly reduced strain values compared to the remote myocardium. Fast-SENC presented a higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting infarcted segments than FT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9366255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93662552022-08-12 A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction El-Saadi, Walid Engvall, Jan Edvin Alfredsson, Joakim Karlsson, Jan-Erik Martins, Marcelo Sederholm, Sofia Faisal Zaman, Shaikh Ebbers, Tino Kihlberg, Johan Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a major cause of heart failure. Left ventricular adverse remodeling is common post-MI. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between reduced myocardial strain and the development of adverse remodeling. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with fast-strain encoding (fast-SENC) or feature tracking (FT) enables rapid assessment of myocardial deformation. The aim of this study was to establish a head-to-head comparison of fast-SENC and FT in post-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, with clinical 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2DEcho) as a reference. METHODS: Thirty patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI were investigated. All participants underwent CMR examination with late gadolinium enhancement, cine-loop steady-state free precession, and fast-SENC imaging using a 1.5T scanner as well as a 2DEcho. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), segmental longitudinal strain (SLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and segmental circumferential strain (SCS) were assessed along with the MI scar extent. RESULTS: The GCS measurements from fast-SENC and FT were nearly identical: the mean difference was 0.01 (2.5)% (95% CI – 0.92 to 0.95). For GLS, fast-SENC values were higher than FT, with a mean difference of 1.8 (1.4)% (95% CI 1.31–2.35). Tests of significance for GLS did not show any differences between the MR methods and 2DEcho. Average strain in the infarct-related artery (IRA) segments compared to the remote myocardium was significantly lower for the left anterior descending artery and right coronary artery culprits but not for the left circumflex artery culprits. Fast-SENC displayed a higher area under the curve for detecting infarcted segments than FT for both SCS and SLS. CONCLUSION: GLS and GCS did not significantly differ between fast-SENC and FT. Both showed acceptable agreement with 2DEcho for longitudinal strain. Segments perfused by the IRA showed significantly reduced strain values compared to the remote myocardium. Fast-SENC presented a higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting infarcted segments than FT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9366255/ /pubmed/35966533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.949440 Text en Copyright © 2022 El-Saadi, Engvall, Alfredsson, Karlsson, Martins, Sederholm, Faisal Zaman, Ebbers and Kihlberg. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
El-Saadi, Walid
Engvall, Jan Edvin
Alfredsson, Joakim
Karlsson, Jan-Erik
Martins, Marcelo
Sederholm, Sofia
Faisal Zaman, Shaikh
Ebbers, Tino
Kihlberg, Johan
A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction
title A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction
title_full A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction
title_fullStr A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction
title_short A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction
title_sort head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966533
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.949440
work_keys_str_mv AT elsaadiwalid aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT engvalljanedvin aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT alfredssonjoakim aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT karlssonjanerik aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT martinsmarcelo aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT sederholmsofia aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT faisalzamanshaikh aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT ebberstino aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT kihlbergjohan aheadtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT elsaadiwalid headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT engvalljanedvin headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT alfredssonjoakim headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT karlssonjanerik headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT martinsmarcelo headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT sederholmsofia headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT faisalzamanshaikh headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT ebberstino headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction
AT kihlbergjohan headtoheadcomparisonofmyocardialstrainbyfaststrainencodingandfeaturetrackingimaginginacutemyocardialinfarction