Cargando…

Anterior hilum anastomosis versus posterior hilum anastomosis in a mouse lung transplantation model

OBJECTIVES: The mouse orthotopic lung transplantation (LTx) model is of enormous research value in lung transplantation. This study compares 2 anastomotic methods (anterior and posterior hilum anastomosis) of mouse LTx in term of difficulty, operation time, and postoperative effects. METHODS: Twenty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Jin, Tian, Dong, Yang, Xiucheng, Liu, Mingzhao, Chen, JingYu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.04.019
_version_ 1784765588598423552
author Zhao, Jin
Tian, Dong
Yang, Xiucheng
Liu, Mingzhao
Chen, JingYu
author_facet Zhao, Jin
Tian, Dong
Yang, Xiucheng
Liu, Mingzhao
Chen, JingYu
author_sort Zhao, Jin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The mouse orthotopic lung transplantation (LTx) model is of enormous research value in lung transplantation. This study compares 2 anastomotic methods (anterior and posterior hilum anastomosis) of mouse LTx in term of difficulty, operation time, and postoperative effects. METHODS: Twenty mice received LTx with slipknots for anterior hilum anastomosis (AH group), and 28 received LTx with a microvessel clip for posterior hilum anastomosis (PH group), all by a single surgeon. The operation time was recorded and the grafts were evaluated 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: The success rates in the recipient animals were 85% (17/20) in AH group and 89% (25/28) in PH group (P > .05). The recipient operation time and back table time in AH group were longer than those in PH group (52.8 ± 5.0 vs 47.3 ± 5.7 minutes, 27.8 ± 3.9 vs 25.3 ± 2.8 minutes, P < .05), but the warm ischemia time did not differ significantly (13.1 ± 2.1 vs 12.2 ± 2.6 minutes, P = .258), meaning that the time discrepancies predominantly originated from the hilum treatment. In AH group, 2 cases failed due to pulmonary venous thrombosis and atelectasis respectively at 24 hours after LTx, but none failed in PH group. No significant difference was observed in the postoperative performance of the successful recipients (thoracic radiographs, macroscopic appearance, oxygenation index, pulmonary compliance, pathologic changes) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with anterior hilar anastomosis, posterior hilum anastomosis with a microvessel clip is less complicated and less time-consuming in the management of hilar structures and causes fewer postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9366536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93665362022-08-12 Anterior hilum anastomosis versus posterior hilum anastomosis in a mouse lung transplantation model Zhao, Jin Tian, Dong Yang, Xiucheng Liu, Mingzhao Chen, JingYu JTCVS Tech Thoracic: Lung Transplant: Basic Science OBJECTIVES: The mouse orthotopic lung transplantation (LTx) model is of enormous research value in lung transplantation. This study compares 2 anastomotic methods (anterior and posterior hilum anastomosis) of mouse LTx in term of difficulty, operation time, and postoperative effects. METHODS: Twenty mice received LTx with slipknots for anterior hilum anastomosis (AH group), and 28 received LTx with a microvessel clip for posterior hilum anastomosis (PH group), all by a single surgeon. The operation time was recorded and the grafts were evaluated 24 hours after surgery. RESULTS: The success rates in the recipient animals were 85% (17/20) in AH group and 89% (25/28) in PH group (P > .05). The recipient operation time and back table time in AH group were longer than those in PH group (52.8 ± 5.0 vs 47.3 ± 5.7 minutes, 27.8 ± 3.9 vs 25.3 ± 2.8 minutes, P < .05), but the warm ischemia time did not differ significantly (13.1 ± 2.1 vs 12.2 ± 2.6 minutes, P = .258), meaning that the time discrepancies predominantly originated from the hilum treatment. In AH group, 2 cases failed due to pulmonary venous thrombosis and atelectasis respectively at 24 hours after LTx, but none failed in PH group. No significant difference was observed in the postoperative performance of the successful recipients (thoracic radiographs, macroscopic appearance, oxygenation index, pulmonary compliance, pathologic changes) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with anterior hilar anastomosis, posterior hilum anastomosis with a microvessel clip is less complicated and less time-consuming in the management of hilar structures and causes fewer postoperative complications. Elsevier 2022-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9366536/ /pubmed/35967242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.04.019 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Thoracic: Lung Transplant: Basic Science
Zhao, Jin
Tian, Dong
Yang, Xiucheng
Liu, Mingzhao
Chen, JingYu
Anterior hilum anastomosis versus posterior hilum anastomosis in a mouse lung transplantation model
title Anterior hilum anastomosis versus posterior hilum anastomosis in a mouse lung transplantation model
title_full Anterior hilum anastomosis versus posterior hilum anastomosis in a mouse lung transplantation model
title_fullStr Anterior hilum anastomosis versus posterior hilum anastomosis in a mouse lung transplantation model
title_full_unstemmed Anterior hilum anastomosis versus posterior hilum anastomosis in a mouse lung transplantation model
title_short Anterior hilum anastomosis versus posterior hilum anastomosis in a mouse lung transplantation model
title_sort anterior hilum anastomosis versus posterior hilum anastomosis in a mouse lung transplantation model
topic Thoracic: Lung Transplant: Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.04.019
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaojin anteriorhilumanastomosisversusposteriorhilumanastomosisinamouselungtransplantationmodel
AT tiandong anteriorhilumanastomosisversusposteriorhilumanastomosisinamouselungtransplantationmodel
AT yangxiucheng anteriorhilumanastomosisversusposteriorhilumanastomosisinamouselungtransplantationmodel
AT liumingzhao anteriorhilumanastomosisversusposteriorhilumanastomosisinamouselungtransplantationmodel
AT chenjingyu anteriorhilumanastomosisversusposteriorhilumanastomosisinamouselungtransplantationmodel