Cargando…

A behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching in the emergency department

Evaluating a resident's development as a bedside educator in the emergency department (ED) is challenging. Teaching consults, where trainees are observed and assessed in their teaching skills, have been used to improve bedside teaching. Within emergency medicine, there are a few assessment tool...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ijaz, Hamza, Stull, Matthew, McDonough, Erin, Paulsen, Robbie, Hill, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35979341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10789
_version_ 1784765599697600512
author Ijaz, Hamza
Stull, Matthew
McDonough, Erin
Paulsen, Robbie
Hill, Jeffrey
author_facet Ijaz, Hamza
Stull, Matthew
McDonough, Erin
Paulsen, Robbie
Hill, Jeffrey
author_sort Ijaz, Hamza
collection PubMed
description Evaluating a resident's development as a bedside educator in the emergency department (ED) is challenging. Teaching consults, where trainees are observed and assessed in their teaching skills, have been used to improve bedside teaching. Within emergency medicine, there are a few assessment tools to evaluate a clinician's bedside teaching, with the majority focusing on faculty. A user‐friendly assessment tool adapted to the ED that emphasizes behaviorally anchored, milestone‐based evaluations for residents has yet to be developed. We sought to develop such an assessment tool for evaluating residents' bedside teaching in the ED. Using a nominal‐group consensus‐building technique, we derived the bedside teaching assessment tool. The consensus‐building panel was composed of clinician‐educators with extensive experience in resident education. The teaching consult process consisted of the consultant, a faculty member with a focus in medical education, directly observing a resident's bedside teaching throughout their shift while filling out the evaluation form based on observed behaviors. A total of 35 consults were provided to 30 individual residents. The mean (±SD) scores for the 35 consults for the learning climate, content teaching, supervision, feedback and evaluation, and self‐assessment were 3.84 (±0.75), 3.56 (±0.58), 3.70 (±0.60), 3.64 (±0.77), and 3.92 (±0.45), respectively. The median scores for the above domains were 4, 3.5, 4, 3.5, and 4, respectively. The tool has acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.723 (95% CI 0.469–0.839). Eleven of 13 (85%) residents who provided feedback agreed or strongly agreed that the quantitative feedback provided by the assessment tool was useful. Twelve of 13 (92%) residents found the consultation process to be unobtrusive to their clinical performance. In conclusion, this novel behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching can serve as a useful adjunct to a teaching consult and provide useful feedback for the development of residents' bedside teaching skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9366581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93665812022-08-16 A behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching in the emergency department Ijaz, Hamza Stull, Matthew McDonough, Erin Paulsen, Robbie Hill, Jeffrey AEM Educ Train Innovations Report Evaluating a resident's development as a bedside educator in the emergency department (ED) is challenging. Teaching consults, where trainees are observed and assessed in their teaching skills, have been used to improve bedside teaching. Within emergency medicine, there are a few assessment tools to evaluate a clinician's bedside teaching, with the majority focusing on faculty. A user‐friendly assessment tool adapted to the ED that emphasizes behaviorally anchored, milestone‐based evaluations for residents has yet to be developed. We sought to develop such an assessment tool for evaluating residents' bedside teaching in the ED. Using a nominal‐group consensus‐building technique, we derived the bedside teaching assessment tool. The consensus‐building panel was composed of clinician‐educators with extensive experience in resident education. The teaching consult process consisted of the consultant, a faculty member with a focus in medical education, directly observing a resident's bedside teaching throughout their shift while filling out the evaluation form based on observed behaviors. A total of 35 consults were provided to 30 individual residents. The mean (±SD) scores for the 35 consults for the learning climate, content teaching, supervision, feedback and evaluation, and self‐assessment were 3.84 (±0.75), 3.56 (±0.58), 3.70 (±0.60), 3.64 (±0.77), and 3.92 (±0.45), respectively. The median scores for the above domains were 4, 3.5, 4, 3.5, and 4, respectively. The tool has acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.723 (95% CI 0.469–0.839). Eleven of 13 (85%) residents who provided feedback agreed or strongly agreed that the quantitative feedback provided by the assessment tool was useful. Twelve of 13 (92%) residents found the consultation process to be unobtrusive to their clinical performance. In conclusion, this novel behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching can serve as a useful adjunct to a teaching consult and provide useful feedback for the development of residents' bedside teaching skills. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9366581/ /pubmed/35979341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10789 Text en © 2022 The Authors. AEM Education and Training published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Innovations Report
Ijaz, Hamza
Stull, Matthew
McDonough, Erin
Paulsen, Robbie
Hill, Jeffrey
A behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching in the emergency department
title A behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching in the emergency department
title_full A behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching in the emergency department
title_fullStr A behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed A behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching in the emergency department
title_short A behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching in the emergency department
title_sort behaviorally anchored assessment tool for bedside teaching in the emergency department
topic Innovations Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35979341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10789
work_keys_str_mv AT ijazhamza abehaviorallyanchoredassessmenttoolforbedsideteachingintheemergencydepartment
AT stullmatthew abehaviorallyanchoredassessmenttoolforbedsideteachingintheemergencydepartment
AT mcdonougherin abehaviorallyanchoredassessmenttoolforbedsideteachingintheemergencydepartment
AT paulsenrobbie abehaviorallyanchoredassessmenttoolforbedsideteachingintheemergencydepartment
AT hilljeffrey abehaviorallyanchoredassessmenttoolforbedsideteachingintheemergencydepartment
AT ijazhamza behaviorallyanchoredassessmenttoolforbedsideteachingintheemergencydepartment
AT stullmatthew behaviorallyanchoredassessmenttoolforbedsideteachingintheemergencydepartment
AT mcdonougherin behaviorallyanchoredassessmenttoolforbedsideteachingintheemergencydepartment
AT paulsenrobbie behaviorallyanchoredassessmenttoolforbedsideteachingintheemergencydepartment
AT hilljeffrey behaviorallyanchoredassessmenttoolforbedsideteachingintheemergencydepartment