Cargando…

Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (Cervus canadensis)

The recovery of carnivore populations in North American has consequences for trophic interactions and population dynamics of prey. In addition to direct effects on prey populations through killing, predators can influence prey behavior by imposing the risk of predation. The mechanisms through which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paterson, John Terrill, Proffitt, Kelly M., DeCesare, Nicholas J., Gude, Justin A., Hebblewhite, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35979523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9201
_version_ 1784765636728061952
author Paterson, John Terrill
Proffitt, Kelly M.
DeCesare, Nicholas J.
Gude, Justin A.
Hebblewhite, Mark
author_facet Paterson, John Terrill
Proffitt, Kelly M.
DeCesare, Nicholas J.
Gude, Justin A.
Hebblewhite, Mark
author_sort Paterson, John Terrill
collection PubMed
description The recovery of carnivore populations in North American has consequences for trophic interactions and population dynamics of prey. In addition to direct effects on prey populations through killing, predators can influence prey behavior by imposing the risk of predation. The mechanisms through which patterns of space use by predators are linked to behavioral response by prey and nonconsumptive effects on prey population dynamics are poorly understood. Our goal was to characterize population‐ and individual‐level patterns of resource selection by elk (Cervus canadensis) in response to risk of wolves (Canis lupus) and mountain lions (Puma concolor) and evaluate potential nonconsumptive effects of these behavioral patterns. We tested the hypothesis that individual elk risk‐avoidance behavior during summer would result in exposure to lower‐quality forage and reduced body fat and pregnancy rates. First, we evaluated individuals' second‐order and third‐order resource selection with a used‐available sampling design. At the population level, we found evidence for a positive relationship between second‐ and third‐order selection and forage, and an interaction between forage quality and mountain lion risk such that the relative probability of use at low mountain lion risk increased with forage quality but decreased at high risk at both orders of selection. We found no evidence of a population‐level trade‐off between forage quality and wolf risk. However, we found substantial among‐individual heterogeneity in resource selection patterns such that population‐level patterns were potentially misleading. We found no evidence that the diversity of individual resource selection patterns varied predictably with available resources, or that patterns of individual risk‐related resource selection translated into biologically meaningful changes in body fat or pregnancy rates. Our work highlights the importance of evaluating individual responses to predation risk and predator hunting technique when assessing responses to predators and suggests nonconsumptive effects are not operating at a population scale in this system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9366754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93667542022-08-16 Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (Cervus canadensis) Paterson, John Terrill Proffitt, Kelly M. DeCesare, Nicholas J. Gude, Justin A. Hebblewhite, Mark Ecol Evol Research Articles The recovery of carnivore populations in North American has consequences for trophic interactions and population dynamics of prey. In addition to direct effects on prey populations through killing, predators can influence prey behavior by imposing the risk of predation. The mechanisms through which patterns of space use by predators are linked to behavioral response by prey and nonconsumptive effects on prey population dynamics are poorly understood. Our goal was to characterize population‐ and individual‐level patterns of resource selection by elk (Cervus canadensis) in response to risk of wolves (Canis lupus) and mountain lions (Puma concolor) and evaluate potential nonconsumptive effects of these behavioral patterns. We tested the hypothesis that individual elk risk‐avoidance behavior during summer would result in exposure to lower‐quality forage and reduced body fat and pregnancy rates. First, we evaluated individuals' second‐order and third‐order resource selection with a used‐available sampling design. At the population level, we found evidence for a positive relationship between second‐ and third‐order selection and forage, and an interaction between forage quality and mountain lion risk such that the relative probability of use at low mountain lion risk increased with forage quality but decreased at high risk at both orders of selection. We found no evidence of a population‐level trade‐off between forage quality and wolf risk. However, we found substantial among‐individual heterogeneity in resource selection patterns such that population‐level patterns were potentially misleading. We found no evidence that the diversity of individual resource selection patterns varied predictably with available resources, or that patterns of individual risk‐related resource selection translated into biologically meaningful changes in body fat or pregnancy rates. Our work highlights the importance of evaluating individual responses to predation risk and predator hunting technique when assessing responses to predators and suggests nonconsumptive effects are not operating at a population scale in this system. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9366754/ /pubmed/35979523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9201 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Paterson, John Terrill
Proffitt, Kelly M.
DeCesare, Nicholas J.
Gude, Justin A.
Hebblewhite, Mark
Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (Cervus canadensis)
title Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (Cervus canadensis)
title_full Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (Cervus canadensis)
title_fullStr Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (Cervus canadensis)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (Cervus canadensis)
title_short Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (Cervus canadensis)
title_sort evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (cervus canadensis)
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35979523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9201
work_keys_str_mv AT patersonjohnterrill evaluatingthesummerlandscapesofpredationriskandforagequalityforelkcervuscanadensis
AT proffittkellym evaluatingthesummerlandscapesofpredationriskandforagequalityforelkcervuscanadensis
AT decesarenicholasj evaluatingthesummerlandscapesofpredationriskandforagequalityforelkcervuscanadensis
AT gudejustina evaluatingthesummerlandscapesofpredationriskandforagequalityforelkcervuscanadensis
AT hebblewhitemark evaluatingthesummerlandscapesofpredationriskandforagequalityforelkcervuscanadensis