Cargando…

The dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a leading cause of chronic infections, forms prolific biofilms which afford an escape route from antibiotic treatment and host immunity. However, MRSA clones are genetically diverse, and mechanisms underlying biofilm formation remain un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vlaeminck, Jelle, Lin, Qiang, Xavier, Basil Britto, De Backer, Sarah, Berkell, Matilda, De Greve, Henri, Hernalsteens, Jean-Pierre, Kumar-Singh, Samir, Goossens, Herman, Malhotra-Kumar, Surbhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.882346
_version_ 1784765675827363840
author Vlaeminck, Jelle
Lin, Qiang
Xavier, Basil Britto
De Backer, Sarah
Berkell, Matilda
De Greve, Henri
Hernalsteens, Jean-Pierre
Kumar-Singh, Samir
Goossens, Herman
Malhotra-Kumar, Surbhi
author_facet Vlaeminck, Jelle
Lin, Qiang
Xavier, Basil Britto
De Backer, Sarah
Berkell, Matilda
De Greve, Henri
Hernalsteens, Jean-Pierre
Kumar-Singh, Samir
Goossens, Herman
Malhotra-Kumar, Surbhi
author_sort Vlaeminck, Jelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a leading cause of chronic infections, forms prolific biofilms which afford an escape route from antibiotic treatment and host immunity. However, MRSA clones are genetically diverse, and mechanisms underlying biofilm formation remain under-studied. Such studies form the basis for developing targeted therapeutics. Here, we studied the temporal changes in the biofilm transcriptome of three pandemic MRSA clones: USA300, HEMRSA-15, and ST239. METHODS: Biofilm formation was assessed using a static model with one representative strain per clone. Total RNA was extracted from biofilm and planktonic cultures after 24, 48, and 72 h of growth, followed by rRNA depletion and sequencing (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States, NextSeq500, v2, 1 × 75 bp). Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis between phenotypes and among early (24 h), intermediate (48 h), and late (72 h) stages of biofilms was performed together with in silico co-expression network construction and compared between clones. To understand the influence of SCCmec and ACME on biofilm formation, isogenic mutants containing deletions of the entire elements or of single genes therein were constructed in USA300. RESULTS: Genes involved in primarily core genome-encoded KEGG pathways (transporters and others) were upregulated in 24-h biofilm culture compared to 24-h planktonic culture. However, the number of affected pathways in the ST239 24 h biofilm (n = 11) was remarkably lower than that in USA300/EMRSA-15 biofilms (USA300: n = 27, HEMRSA-15: n = 58). The clfA gene, which encodes clumping factor A, was the single common DEG identified across the three clones in 24-h biofilm culture (2.2- to 2.66-fold). In intermediate (48 h) and late (72 h) stages of biofilms, decreased expression of central metabolic and fermentative pathways (glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, fatty acid biosynthesis), indicating a shift to anaerobic conditions, was already evident in USA300 and HEMRSA-15 in 48-h biofilm cultures; ST239 showed a similar profile at 72 h. Last, SCCmec+ACME deletion and opp3D disruption negatively affected USA300 biofilm formation. CONCLUSION: Our data show striking differences in gene expression during biofilm formation by three of the most important pandemic MRSA clones, USA300, HEMRSA-15, and ST239. The clfA gene was the only significantly upregulated gene across all three strains in 24-h biofilm cultures and exemplifies an important target to disrupt early biofilms. Furthermore, our data indicate a critical role for arginine catabolism pathways in early biofilm formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9366926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93669262022-08-12 The dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Vlaeminck, Jelle Lin, Qiang Xavier, Basil Britto De Backer, Sarah Berkell, Matilda De Greve, Henri Hernalsteens, Jean-Pierre Kumar-Singh, Samir Goossens, Herman Malhotra-Kumar, Surbhi Front Microbiol Microbiology BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a leading cause of chronic infections, forms prolific biofilms which afford an escape route from antibiotic treatment and host immunity. However, MRSA clones are genetically diverse, and mechanisms underlying biofilm formation remain under-studied. Such studies form the basis for developing targeted therapeutics. Here, we studied the temporal changes in the biofilm transcriptome of three pandemic MRSA clones: USA300, HEMRSA-15, and ST239. METHODS: Biofilm formation was assessed using a static model with one representative strain per clone. Total RNA was extracted from biofilm and planktonic cultures after 24, 48, and 72 h of growth, followed by rRNA depletion and sequencing (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States, NextSeq500, v2, 1 × 75 bp). Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis between phenotypes and among early (24 h), intermediate (48 h), and late (72 h) stages of biofilms was performed together with in silico co-expression network construction and compared between clones. To understand the influence of SCCmec and ACME on biofilm formation, isogenic mutants containing deletions of the entire elements or of single genes therein were constructed in USA300. RESULTS: Genes involved in primarily core genome-encoded KEGG pathways (transporters and others) were upregulated in 24-h biofilm culture compared to 24-h planktonic culture. However, the number of affected pathways in the ST239 24 h biofilm (n = 11) was remarkably lower than that in USA300/EMRSA-15 biofilms (USA300: n = 27, HEMRSA-15: n = 58). The clfA gene, which encodes clumping factor A, was the single common DEG identified across the three clones in 24-h biofilm culture (2.2- to 2.66-fold). In intermediate (48 h) and late (72 h) stages of biofilms, decreased expression of central metabolic and fermentative pathways (glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, fatty acid biosynthesis), indicating a shift to anaerobic conditions, was already evident in USA300 and HEMRSA-15 in 48-h biofilm cultures; ST239 showed a similar profile at 72 h. Last, SCCmec+ACME deletion and opp3D disruption negatively affected USA300 biofilm formation. CONCLUSION: Our data show striking differences in gene expression during biofilm formation by three of the most important pandemic MRSA clones, USA300, HEMRSA-15, and ST239. The clfA gene was the only significantly upregulated gene across all three strains in 24-h biofilm cultures and exemplifies an important target to disrupt early biofilms. Furthermore, our data indicate a critical role for arginine catabolism pathways in early biofilm formation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9366926/ /pubmed/35966712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.882346 Text en Copyright © 2022 Vlaeminck, Lin, Xavier, De Backer, Berkell, De Greve, Hernalsteens, Kumar-Singh, Goossens and Malhotra-Kumar. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Vlaeminck, Jelle
Lin, Qiang
Xavier, Basil Britto
De Backer, Sarah
Berkell, Matilda
De Greve, Henri
Hernalsteens, Jean-Pierre
Kumar-Singh, Samir
Goossens, Herman
Malhotra-Kumar, Surbhi
The dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title The dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_full The dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_fullStr The dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_full_unstemmed The dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_short The dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
title_sort dynamic transcriptome during maturation of biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.882346
work_keys_str_mv AT vlaeminckjelle thedynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT linqiang thedynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT xavierbasilbritto thedynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT debackersarah thedynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT berkellmatilda thedynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT degrevehenri thedynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT hernalsteensjeanpierre thedynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT kumarsinghsamir thedynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT goossensherman thedynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT malhotrakumarsurbhi thedynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT vlaeminckjelle dynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT linqiang dynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT xavierbasilbritto dynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT debackersarah dynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT berkellmatilda dynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT degrevehenri dynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT hernalsteensjeanpierre dynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT kumarsinghsamir dynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT goossensherman dynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus
AT malhotrakumarsurbhi dynamictranscriptomeduringmaturationofbiofilmsformedbymethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureus