Cargando…
An Estimate of the Amount of Geological CO(2) Storage over the Period of 1996–2020
[Image: see text] The climate impact of carbon capture and storage depends on how much CO(2) is stored underground, yet databases of industrial-scale projects report capture capacity as a measure of project size. We review publicly available sources to estimate the amount of CO(2) that has been stor...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00296 |
_version_ | 1784765692017377280 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yuting Jackson, Christopher Krevor, Samuel |
author_facet | Zhang, Yuting Jackson, Christopher Krevor, Samuel |
author_sort | Zhang, Yuting |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The climate impact of carbon capture and storage depends on how much CO(2) is stored underground, yet databases of industrial-scale projects report capture capacity as a measure of project size. We review publicly available sources to estimate the amount of CO(2) that has been stored by facilities since 1996. We organize these sources into three categories corresponding to the associated degree of assurance: (1) legal assurance, (2) quality assurance through auditing, and (3) no assurance. Data were found for 20 facilities, with an aggregate capture capacity of 36 Mt of CO(2) year(–1). Combining data from all categories, we estimate that 29 Mt of CO(2) was geologically stored in 2019 and there was cumulative storage of 197 Mt over the period of 1996–2020. These are climate relevant scales commensurate with recent cumulative and ongoing emissions impacts of renewables in some markets, e.g., solar photovoltaics in the United States. The widely used capture capacity is in aggregate 19–30% higher than storage rates and is not a good proxy for estimating storage volumes. However, the discrepancy is project-specific and not always a reflection of project performance. This work provides a snapshot of storage amounts and highlights the need for uniform reporting on capture and storage rates with quality assurance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9366999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93669992022-08-12 An Estimate of the Amount of Geological CO(2) Storage over the Period of 1996–2020 Zhang, Yuting Jackson, Christopher Krevor, Samuel Environ Sci Technol Lett [Image: see text] The climate impact of carbon capture and storage depends on how much CO(2) is stored underground, yet databases of industrial-scale projects report capture capacity as a measure of project size. We review publicly available sources to estimate the amount of CO(2) that has been stored by facilities since 1996. We organize these sources into three categories corresponding to the associated degree of assurance: (1) legal assurance, (2) quality assurance through auditing, and (3) no assurance. Data were found for 20 facilities, with an aggregate capture capacity of 36 Mt of CO(2) year(–1). Combining data from all categories, we estimate that 29 Mt of CO(2) was geologically stored in 2019 and there was cumulative storage of 197 Mt over the period of 1996–2020. These are climate relevant scales commensurate with recent cumulative and ongoing emissions impacts of renewables in some markets, e.g., solar photovoltaics in the United States. The widely used capture capacity is in aggregate 19–30% higher than storage rates and is not a good proxy for estimating storage volumes. However, the discrepancy is project-specific and not always a reflection of project performance. This work provides a snapshot of storage amounts and highlights the need for uniform reporting on capture and storage rates with quality assurance. American Chemical Society 2022-07-19 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9366999/ /pubmed/35966457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00296 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Zhang, Yuting Jackson, Christopher Krevor, Samuel An Estimate of the Amount of Geological CO(2) Storage over the Period of 1996–2020 |
title | An Estimate
of the Amount of Geological CO(2) Storage over the Period
of 1996–2020 |
title_full | An Estimate
of the Amount of Geological CO(2) Storage over the Period
of 1996–2020 |
title_fullStr | An Estimate
of the Amount of Geological CO(2) Storage over the Period
of 1996–2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | An Estimate
of the Amount of Geological CO(2) Storage over the Period
of 1996–2020 |
title_short | An Estimate
of the Amount of Geological CO(2) Storage over the Period
of 1996–2020 |
title_sort | estimate
of the amount of geological co(2) storage over the period
of 1996–2020 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9366999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyuting anestimateoftheamountofgeologicalco2storageovertheperiodof19962020 AT jacksonchristopher anestimateoftheamountofgeologicalco2storageovertheperiodof19962020 AT krevorsamuel anestimateoftheamountofgeologicalco2storageovertheperiodof19962020 AT zhangyuting estimateoftheamountofgeologicalco2storageovertheperiodof19962020 AT jacksonchristopher estimateoftheamountofgeologicalco2storageovertheperiodof19962020 AT krevorsamuel estimateoftheamountofgeologicalco2storageovertheperiodof19962020 |