Cargando…

Lower extremity joint compensatory effects during the first recovery step following slipping and stumbling perturbations in young and older subjects

BACKGROUND: The lower extremity may play a crucial role in compensating for gait perturbations. The study aimed to explore the mechanism of perturbation compensation by investigating the gait characteristics and lower extremity joint moment effects in young (YS) and older subjects (OS) during the fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Xiping, Lutter, Christoph, Kebbach, Maeruan, Bruhn, Sven, Bader, Rainer, Tischer, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35948887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03354-3
_version_ 1784765710241628160
author Ren, Xiping
Lutter, Christoph
Kebbach, Maeruan
Bruhn, Sven
Bader, Rainer
Tischer, Thomas
author_facet Ren, Xiping
Lutter, Christoph
Kebbach, Maeruan
Bruhn, Sven
Bader, Rainer
Tischer, Thomas
author_sort Ren, Xiping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The lower extremity may play a crucial role in compensating for gait perturbations. The study aimed to explore the mechanism of perturbation compensation by investigating the gait characteristics and lower extremity joint moment effects in young (YS) and older subjects (OS) during the first recovery gait following slipping (slipping_Rec1) and stumbling (stumbling_Rec1). METHOD: An automatic perturbation-triggered program was developed using D-Flow software based on the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab to induce the two aforementioned perturbations. Marker trajectories and ground reaction forces were recorded from 15 healthy YS (age: 26.53 ± 3.04 years; body height: 1.73 ± 0.07 m; body mass: 66.81 ± 11.44 kg) and 15 healthy OS (age: 68.33 ± 3.29 years; body height: 1.76 ± 0.10 m; body mass: 81.13 ± 13.99 kg). The Human Body Model was used to compute the variables of interest. One-way analysis of variance and independent samples t-test statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: In slipping_Rec1 and stumbling_Rec1, the change in gait pattern was mainly reflected in a significant increase in step width, no alterations in step length and stance/swing ratio were revealed. Based on perturbed task specificity, lower extremity joint moments increased or decreased at specific phases of the gait cycle in both YS and OS in slipping_Rec1 and stumbling_Rec1 compared to normal gait. The two perturbed gaits reflected the respective compensatory requirements for the lower extremity joints, with both sagittal and frontal joint moments producing compensatory effects. The aging effect was not reflected in the gait pattern, but rather in the hip extension moment during the initial stance of slipping_Rec1. CONCLUSIONS: Slipping appears to be more demanding for gait recovery than stumbling. Gait perturbation compensatory mechanisms for OS should concentrate on ankle strategy in the frontal plane and counter-rotation strategy around the hip.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9367084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93670842022-08-12 Lower extremity joint compensatory effects during the first recovery step following slipping and stumbling perturbations in young and older subjects Ren, Xiping Lutter, Christoph Kebbach, Maeruan Bruhn, Sven Bader, Rainer Tischer, Thomas BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: The lower extremity may play a crucial role in compensating for gait perturbations. The study aimed to explore the mechanism of perturbation compensation by investigating the gait characteristics and lower extremity joint moment effects in young (YS) and older subjects (OS) during the first recovery gait following slipping (slipping_Rec1) and stumbling (stumbling_Rec1). METHOD: An automatic perturbation-triggered program was developed using D-Flow software based on the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab to induce the two aforementioned perturbations. Marker trajectories and ground reaction forces were recorded from 15 healthy YS (age: 26.53 ± 3.04 years; body height: 1.73 ± 0.07 m; body mass: 66.81 ± 11.44 kg) and 15 healthy OS (age: 68.33 ± 3.29 years; body height: 1.76 ± 0.10 m; body mass: 81.13 ± 13.99 kg). The Human Body Model was used to compute the variables of interest. One-way analysis of variance and independent samples t-test statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: In slipping_Rec1 and stumbling_Rec1, the change in gait pattern was mainly reflected in a significant increase in step width, no alterations in step length and stance/swing ratio were revealed. Based on perturbed task specificity, lower extremity joint moments increased or decreased at specific phases of the gait cycle in both YS and OS in slipping_Rec1 and stumbling_Rec1 compared to normal gait. The two perturbed gaits reflected the respective compensatory requirements for the lower extremity joints, with both sagittal and frontal joint moments producing compensatory effects. The aging effect was not reflected in the gait pattern, but rather in the hip extension moment during the initial stance of slipping_Rec1. CONCLUSIONS: Slipping appears to be more demanding for gait recovery than stumbling. Gait perturbation compensatory mechanisms for OS should concentrate on ankle strategy in the frontal plane and counter-rotation strategy around the hip. BioMed Central 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9367084/ /pubmed/35948887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03354-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ren, Xiping
Lutter, Christoph
Kebbach, Maeruan
Bruhn, Sven
Bader, Rainer
Tischer, Thomas
Lower extremity joint compensatory effects during the first recovery step following slipping and stumbling perturbations in young and older subjects
title Lower extremity joint compensatory effects during the first recovery step following slipping and stumbling perturbations in young and older subjects
title_full Lower extremity joint compensatory effects during the first recovery step following slipping and stumbling perturbations in young and older subjects
title_fullStr Lower extremity joint compensatory effects during the first recovery step following slipping and stumbling perturbations in young and older subjects
title_full_unstemmed Lower extremity joint compensatory effects during the first recovery step following slipping and stumbling perturbations in young and older subjects
title_short Lower extremity joint compensatory effects during the first recovery step following slipping and stumbling perturbations in young and older subjects
title_sort lower extremity joint compensatory effects during the first recovery step following slipping and stumbling perturbations in young and older subjects
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35948887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03354-3
work_keys_str_mv AT renxiping lowerextremityjointcompensatoryeffectsduringthefirstrecoverystepfollowingslippingandstumblingperturbationsinyoungandoldersubjects
AT lutterchristoph lowerextremityjointcompensatoryeffectsduringthefirstrecoverystepfollowingslippingandstumblingperturbationsinyoungandoldersubjects
AT kebbachmaeruan lowerextremityjointcompensatoryeffectsduringthefirstrecoverystepfollowingslippingandstumblingperturbationsinyoungandoldersubjects
AT bruhnsven lowerextremityjointcompensatoryeffectsduringthefirstrecoverystepfollowingslippingandstumblingperturbationsinyoungandoldersubjects
AT baderrainer lowerextremityjointcompensatoryeffectsduringthefirstrecoverystepfollowingslippingandstumblingperturbationsinyoungandoldersubjects
AT tischerthomas lowerextremityjointcompensatoryeffectsduringthefirstrecoverystepfollowingslippingandstumblingperturbationsinyoungandoldersubjects