Cargando…

Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Soft robotic wearable devices, referred to as exosuits, can be a valid alternative to rigid exoskeletons when it comes to daily upper limb support. Indeed, their inherent flexibility improves comfort, usability, and portability while not constraining the user’s natural degrees of freed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bardi, Elena, Gandolla, Marta, Braghin, Francesco, Resta, Ferruccio, Pedrocchi, Alessandra L. G., Ambrosini, Emilia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35948915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01065-9
_version_ 1784765716446052352
author Bardi, Elena
Gandolla, Marta
Braghin, Francesco
Resta, Ferruccio
Pedrocchi, Alessandra L. G.
Ambrosini, Emilia
author_facet Bardi, Elena
Gandolla, Marta
Braghin, Francesco
Resta, Ferruccio
Pedrocchi, Alessandra L. G.
Ambrosini, Emilia
author_sort Bardi, Elena
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Soft robotic wearable devices, referred to as exosuits, can be a valid alternative to rigid exoskeletons when it comes to daily upper limb support. Indeed, their inherent flexibility improves comfort, usability, and portability while not constraining the user’s natural degrees of freedom. This review is meant to guide the reader in understanding the current approaches across all design and production steps that might be exploited when developing an upper limb robotic exosuit. METHODS: The literature research regarding such devices was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The investigated features are the intended scenario, type of actuation, supported degrees of freedom, low-level control, high-level control with a focus on intention detection, technology readiness level, and type of experiments conducted to evaluate the device. RESULTS: A total of 105 articles were collected, describing 69 different devices. Devices were grouped according to their actuation type. More than 80% of devices are meant either for rehabilitation, assistance, or both. The most exploited actuation types are pneumatic (52%) and DC motors with cable transmission (29%). Most devices actuate 1 (56%) or 2 (28%) degrees of freedom, and the most targeted joints are the elbow and the shoulder. Intention detection strategies are implemented in 33% of the suits and include the use of switches and buttons, IMUs, stretch and bending sensors, EMG and EEG measurements. Most devices (75%) score a technology readiness level of 4 or 5. CONCLUSION: Although few devices can be considered ready to reach the market, exosuits show very high potential for the assistance of daily activities. Clinical trials exploiting shared evaluation metrics are needed to assess the effectiveness of upper limb exosuits on target users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9367113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93671132022-08-12 Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review Bardi, Elena Gandolla, Marta Braghin, Francesco Resta, Ferruccio Pedrocchi, Alessandra L. G. Ambrosini, Emilia J Neuroeng Rehabil Review INTRODUCTION: Soft robotic wearable devices, referred to as exosuits, can be a valid alternative to rigid exoskeletons when it comes to daily upper limb support. Indeed, their inherent flexibility improves comfort, usability, and portability while not constraining the user’s natural degrees of freedom. This review is meant to guide the reader in understanding the current approaches across all design and production steps that might be exploited when developing an upper limb robotic exosuit. METHODS: The literature research regarding such devices was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The investigated features are the intended scenario, type of actuation, supported degrees of freedom, low-level control, high-level control with a focus on intention detection, technology readiness level, and type of experiments conducted to evaluate the device. RESULTS: A total of 105 articles were collected, describing 69 different devices. Devices were grouped according to their actuation type. More than 80% of devices are meant either for rehabilitation, assistance, or both. The most exploited actuation types are pneumatic (52%) and DC motors with cable transmission (29%). Most devices actuate 1 (56%) or 2 (28%) degrees of freedom, and the most targeted joints are the elbow and the shoulder. Intention detection strategies are implemented in 33% of the suits and include the use of switches and buttons, IMUs, stretch and bending sensors, EMG and EEG measurements. Most devices (75%) score a technology readiness level of 4 or 5. CONCLUSION: Although few devices can be considered ready to reach the market, exosuits show very high potential for the assistance of daily activities. Clinical trials exploiting shared evaluation metrics are needed to assess the effectiveness of upper limb exosuits on target users. BioMed Central 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9367113/ /pubmed/35948915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01065-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Bardi, Elena
Gandolla, Marta
Braghin, Francesco
Resta, Ferruccio
Pedrocchi, Alessandra L. G.
Ambrosini, Emilia
Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review
title Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review
title_full Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review
title_fullStr Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review
title_short Upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review
title_sort upper limb soft robotic wearable devices: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35948915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01065-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bardielena upperlimbsoftroboticwearabledevicesasystematicreview
AT gandollamarta upperlimbsoftroboticwearabledevicesasystematicreview
AT braghinfrancesco upperlimbsoftroboticwearabledevicesasystematicreview
AT restaferruccio upperlimbsoftroboticwearabledevicesasystematicreview
AT pedrocchialessandralg upperlimbsoftroboticwearabledevicesasystematicreview
AT ambrosiniemilia upperlimbsoftroboticwearabledevicesasystematicreview