Cargando…

Clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the feasibility and effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation (PARS). METHODS: Patients with lumbar PARS who received unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression from June 2020 to Se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jianjun, Zhu, Bin, Chen, Lei, Jing, Juehua, Tian, Dasheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.948417
_version_ 1784765738430496768
author Liu, Jianjun
Zhu, Bin
Chen, Lei
Jing, Juehua
Tian, Dasheng
author_facet Liu, Jianjun
Zhu, Bin
Chen, Lei
Jing, Juehua
Tian, Dasheng
author_sort Liu, Jianjun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the feasibility and effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation (PARS). METHODS: Patients with lumbar PARS who received unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression from June 2020 to September 2021 were analyzed, including 11 females and 15 males. The clinical symptoms were consistent with the imaging findings. Operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay and complications were recorded, and the clinical efficacy was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified Macnab scale at preoperative, postoperative 1, 3, 6 months and the last follow-up. RESULTS: Preoperative VAS scores of low back pain were (5.04 ± 1.37) and respectively decreased to (2.81 ± 0.75), (2.35 ± 0.98), (1.65 ± 0.69) and (1.15 ± 0.68) at postoperative 1, 3, 6 months and at the last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (F = 127.317, P = 0.000). Preoperative VAS scores of lower limb pain were (6.92 ± 1.38) and respectively decreased to (2.88 ± 1.07), (2.54 ± 1.03), (1.81 ± 0.80) and (1.00 ± 0.69) at postoperative 1, 3, 6 months and at the last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (F = 285.289, P = 0.000). Preoperative ODI scores were (60.47 ± 8.89) and respectively decreased to (34.72 ± 4.13), (25.80 ± 3.65), (17.71 ± 3.41) and (5.65 ± 2.22) at postoperative 1, 3, 6 months and at the last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (F = 725.255, P = 0.000). According to the modified Macnab criteria, the final outcome was excellent in 22 cases, good in 3 cases, fair in 1 cases. 26 patients could return to work or normal activities within 3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression has the advantages of clear and wide field of vision, large operating space, relatively simple need of surgical instrument and convenient and flexible operation procedure. It can achieve excellent clinical results with favorable efficacy and safety and may become a new minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for lumbar PARS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9367217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93672172022-08-12 Clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation Liu, Jianjun Zhu, Bin Chen, Lei Jing, Juehua Tian, Dasheng Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the feasibility and effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation (PARS). METHODS: Patients with lumbar PARS who received unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression from June 2020 to September 2021 were analyzed, including 11 females and 15 males. The clinical symptoms were consistent with the imaging findings. Operation time, length of postoperative hospital stay and complications were recorded, and the clinical efficacy was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified Macnab scale at preoperative, postoperative 1, 3, 6 months and the last follow-up. RESULTS: Preoperative VAS scores of low back pain were (5.04 ± 1.37) and respectively decreased to (2.81 ± 0.75), (2.35 ± 0.98), (1.65 ± 0.69) and (1.15 ± 0.68) at postoperative 1, 3, 6 months and at the last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (F = 127.317, P = 0.000). Preoperative VAS scores of lower limb pain were (6.92 ± 1.38) and respectively decreased to (2.88 ± 1.07), (2.54 ± 1.03), (1.81 ± 0.80) and (1.00 ± 0.69) at postoperative 1, 3, 6 months and at the last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (F = 285.289, P = 0.000). Preoperative ODI scores were (60.47 ± 8.89) and respectively decreased to (34.72 ± 4.13), (25.80 ± 3.65), (17.71 ± 3.41) and (5.65 ± 2.22) at postoperative 1, 3, 6 months and at the last follow-up, and the difference was statistically significant (F = 725.255, P = 0.000). According to the modified Macnab criteria, the final outcome was excellent in 22 cases, good in 3 cases, fair in 1 cases. 26 patients could return to work or normal activities within 3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression has the advantages of clear and wide field of vision, large operating space, relatively simple need of surgical instrument and convenient and flexible operation procedure. It can achieve excellent clinical results with favorable efficacy and safety and may become a new minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for lumbar PARS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9367217/ /pubmed/35965860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.948417 Text en © 2022 Liu, Zhu, Chen, Jing and Tian. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Liu, Jianjun
Zhu, Bin
Chen, Lei
Jing, Juehua
Tian, Dasheng
Clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation
title Clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation
title_full Clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation
title_fullStr Clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation
title_short Clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation
title_sort clinical effects of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar posterior apophyseal ring separation
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.948417
work_keys_str_mv AT liujianjun clinicaleffectsofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionforlumbarposteriorapophysealringseparation
AT zhubin clinicaleffectsofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionforlumbarposteriorapophysealringseparation
AT chenlei clinicaleffectsofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionforlumbarposteriorapophysealringseparation
AT jingjuehua clinicaleffectsofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionforlumbarposteriorapophysealringseparation
AT tiandasheng clinicaleffectsofunilateralbiportalendoscopicdecompressionforlumbarposteriorapophysealringseparation