Cargando…

Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common tumour often diagnosed with a multifocal presentation. Patients with multifocal HCC represent a heterogeneous group. Although Trans-Arterial ChemoEmbolization (TACE) is the most frequently employed treatment for these patients, previous data sug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Risaliti, Matteo, Bartolini, Ilenia, Campani, Claudia, Arena, Umberto, Xodo, Carlotta, Adotti, Valentina, Rosi, Martina, Taddei, Antonio, Muiesan, Paolo, Amedei, Amedeo, Batignani, Giacomo, Marra, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157535
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3981
_version_ 1784765740139675648
author Risaliti, Matteo
Bartolini, Ilenia
Campani, Claudia
Arena, Umberto
Xodo, Carlotta
Adotti, Valentina
Rosi, Martina
Taddei, Antonio
Muiesan, Paolo
Amedei, Amedeo
Batignani, Giacomo
Marra, Fabio
author_facet Risaliti, Matteo
Bartolini, Ilenia
Campani, Claudia
Arena, Umberto
Xodo, Carlotta
Adotti, Valentina
Rosi, Martina
Taddei, Antonio
Muiesan, Paolo
Amedei, Amedeo
Batignani, Giacomo
Marra, Fabio
author_sort Risaliti, Matteo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common tumour often diagnosed with a multifocal presentation. Patients with multifocal HCC represent a heterogeneous group. Although Trans-Arterial ChemoEmbolization (TACE) is the most frequently employed treatment for these patients, previous data suggested that liver resection (LR) could be a safe and effective procedure. AIM: To compare LR and TACE in patients with multifocal HCC in terms of procedure-related morbidity and oncologic outcomes. METHODS: All patients with multifocal HCC who underwent LR or TACE as the first procedure between May 2011 and March 2021 were enrolled. The decision to perform surgery or TACE was made after a multidisciplinary team evaluation. Only patients in Child-Pugh class A or B7 and stage B (according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, without severe portal hypertension, vascular invasion, or extrahepatic spread) were included in the final analysis. Propensity score matching was used to adjust the baseline differences between patients undergoing LR and the TACE group [number and diameter of lesions, presence of cirrhosis, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score]. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The outcomes of LR and TACE were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: After matching, 30 patients were eligible for the final analysis, 15 in each group. Morbidity rates were 42.9% and 40% for LR and TACE, respectively (P = 0.876). Median OS was not different in the LR and TACE groups (53 mo vs 18 mo, P = 0.312), while DFS was significantly longer with LR (19 mo vs 0 mo, P = 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients in the Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) B2 stage, with AFP levels lower than 400 ng/mL, less than 3 lesions, and lesions bigger than 41 mm, benefited more from LR in terms of DFS. Patients classified as ITA.LI.CA B3, with AFP levels higher than 400 ng/mL and with more than 3 lesions, appeared to receive more benefit from TACE in terms of OS. CONCLUSION: In a small cohort of patients with multifocal HCC, LR confers longer DFS compared with TACE, with similar OS and post-procedural morbidity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9367224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93672242022-09-23 Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis Risaliti, Matteo Bartolini, Ilenia Campani, Claudia Arena, Umberto Xodo, Carlotta Adotti, Valentina Rosi, Martina Taddei, Antonio Muiesan, Paolo Amedei, Amedeo Batignani, Giacomo Marra, Fabio World J Gastroenterol Observational Study BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common tumour often diagnosed with a multifocal presentation. Patients with multifocal HCC represent a heterogeneous group. Although Trans-Arterial ChemoEmbolization (TACE) is the most frequently employed treatment for these patients, previous data suggested that liver resection (LR) could be a safe and effective procedure. AIM: To compare LR and TACE in patients with multifocal HCC in terms of procedure-related morbidity and oncologic outcomes. METHODS: All patients with multifocal HCC who underwent LR or TACE as the first procedure between May 2011 and March 2021 were enrolled. The decision to perform surgery or TACE was made after a multidisciplinary team evaluation. Only patients in Child-Pugh class A or B7 and stage B (according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, without severe portal hypertension, vascular invasion, or extrahepatic spread) were included in the final analysis. Propensity score matching was used to adjust the baseline differences between patients undergoing LR and the TACE group [number and diameter of lesions, presence of cirrhosis, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score]. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The outcomes of LR and TACE were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: After matching, 30 patients were eligible for the final analysis, 15 in each group. Morbidity rates were 42.9% and 40% for LR and TACE, respectively (P = 0.876). Median OS was not different in the LR and TACE groups (53 mo vs 18 mo, P = 0.312), while DFS was significantly longer with LR (19 mo vs 0 mo, P = 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients in the Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) B2 stage, with AFP levels lower than 400 ng/mL, less than 3 lesions, and lesions bigger than 41 mm, benefited more from LR in terms of DFS. Patients classified as ITA.LI.CA B3, with AFP levels higher than 400 ng/mL and with more than 3 lesions, appeared to receive more benefit from TACE in terms of OS. CONCLUSION: In a small cohort of patients with multifocal HCC, LR confers longer DFS compared with TACE, with similar OS and post-procedural morbidity. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-08-07 2022-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9367224/ /pubmed/36157535 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3981 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Observational Study
Risaliti, Matteo
Bartolini, Ilenia
Campani, Claudia
Arena, Umberto
Xodo, Carlotta
Adotti, Valentina
Rosi, Martina
Taddei, Antonio
Muiesan, Paolo
Amedei, Amedeo
Batignani, Giacomo
Marra, Fabio
Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title_full Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title_short Evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
title_sort evaluating the best treatment for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157535
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3981
work_keys_str_mv AT risalitimatteo evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT bartoliniilenia evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT campaniclaudia evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT arenaumberto evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT xodocarlotta evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT adottivalentina evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT rosimartina evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT taddeiantonio evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT muiesanpaolo evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT amedeiamedeo evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT batignanigiacomo evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT marrafabio evaluatingthebesttreatmentformultifocalhepatocellularcarcinomaapropensityscorematchedanalysis