Cargando…
Retrospective Cohort Analysis of the Effect of Age on Lymph Node Harvest, Positivity, and Ratio in Colorectal Cancer
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death, with an increasing incidence in younger patients presenting with more aggressive tumor biology. One clinical marker of immune response that has been studied and found to correlate with overall survival and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954480 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153817 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death, with an increasing incidence in younger patients presenting with more aggressive tumor biology. One clinical marker of immune response that has been studied and found to correlate with overall survival and cancer-specific survival is the lymph node ratio. The goal of our study was to find if age alone, adjusting for known factors that impact nodal harvest, independently impacted lymph node ratio in CRC. We found that age does not impact lymph node ratio in a clinically relevant manner, but that lymph node ratio is strongly corelated with grade and histology of the tumor. ABSTRACT: Introduction: Colon cancer among young patients has increased in incidence and mortality over the past decade. Our objective was to determine if age-related differences exist for total positive nodes (TPN), total lymph node harvest (TLH), and lymph node ratio (LNR). Material and Methods: A retrospective review of stage III surgically resected colorectal cancer patient data in the National Cancer Database (2004–2016) was performed, reviewing TPN, TLH, and LNR (TPN/TLH). Results: Unadjusted analyses suggested significantly higher levels of TLH and TPN (p < 0.0001) in younger patients, while LNR did not differ by age group. On adjusted analysis, TLH remained higher in younger patients (<35 years 1.56 (CI 95 1.54, 1.59)). The age-related effect was less pronounced for LNR (<35 years 1.16 (CI 95 1.13, 1.2)). Conclusion: Younger patients have increased TLH, even after adjusting for known confounders, while age does not have a strong independent impact on LNR. |
---|