Cargando…

Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Most societies regulate human activities using laws that state clearly what is, and is not, legally permissible. However, there is a second layer of permission that is granted—or revoked—by the public. This second layer is known as a ‘social licence to operate’ (SLO), and it represen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Douglas, Janet, Owers, Roly, Campbell, Madeleine L. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12151987
_version_ 1784765803089887232
author Douglas, Janet
Owers, Roly
Campbell, Madeleine L. H.
author_facet Douglas, Janet
Owers, Roly
Campbell, Madeleine L. H.
author_sort Douglas, Janet
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Most societies regulate human activities using laws that state clearly what is, and is not, legally permissible. However, there is a second layer of permission that is granted—or revoked—by the public. This second layer is known as a ‘social licence to operate’ (SLO), and it represents an intangible, implicit agreement between the public and an industry or group. The public may approve of an activity, in which case it can proceed with minimal formalised restrictions, or it may disapprove, and this may herald legal restrictions, or even an outright ban. This review discusses the concept of SLO in relation to equestrianism. Experience from other industries suggests that, to maintain its SLO, equestrianism should take an ethics-based, proactive, progressive, and holistic approach to the protection of equine welfare, and should establish the trust of all stakeholders, including the public. Trust will only ensue if society is confident that equestrianism operates transparently, that its leaders and practitioners are credible, legitimate, and competent, and that its practice reflects society’s values. Earning and maintaining this status will undoubtedly require substantial effort and funding—inputs that should be regarded as an investment in the future of the sport. ABSTRACT: The concept of ‘social licence to operate’ (SLO) is relevant to all animal-use activities. An SLO is an intangible, implicit agreement between the public and an industry/group. Its existence allows that industry/group to pursue its activities with minimal formalised restrictions because such activities have widespread societal approval. In contrast, the imposition of legal restrictions—or even an outright ban—reflect qualified or lack of public support for an activity. This review discusses current threats to equestrianism’s SLO and suggests actions that those across the equine sector need to take to justify the continuation of the SLO. The most important of these is earning the trust of all stakeholders, including the public. Trust requires transparency of operations, establishment and communication of shared values, and demonstration of competence. These attributes can only be gained by taking an ethics-based, proactive, progressive, and holistic approach to the protection of equine welfare. Animal-use activities that have faced challenges to their SLO have achieved variable success in re-establishing the approval of society, and equestrianism can learn from the experience of these groups as it maps its future. The associated effort and cost should be regarded as an investment in the future of the sport.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9367437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93674372022-08-12 Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries? Douglas, Janet Owers, Roly Campbell, Madeleine L. H. Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Most societies regulate human activities using laws that state clearly what is, and is not, legally permissible. However, there is a second layer of permission that is granted—or revoked—by the public. This second layer is known as a ‘social licence to operate’ (SLO), and it represents an intangible, implicit agreement between the public and an industry or group. The public may approve of an activity, in which case it can proceed with minimal formalised restrictions, or it may disapprove, and this may herald legal restrictions, or even an outright ban. This review discusses the concept of SLO in relation to equestrianism. Experience from other industries suggests that, to maintain its SLO, equestrianism should take an ethics-based, proactive, progressive, and holistic approach to the protection of equine welfare, and should establish the trust of all stakeholders, including the public. Trust will only ensue if society is confident that equestrianism operates transparently, that its leaders and practitioners are credible, legitimate, and competent, and that its practice reflects society’s values. Earning and maintaining this status will undoubtedly require substantial effort and funding—inputs that should be regarded as an investment in the future of the sport. ABSTRACT: The concept of ‘social licence to operate’ (SLO) is relevant to all animal-use activities. An SLO is an intangible, implicit agreement between the public and an industry/group. Its existence allows that industry/group to pursue its activities with minimal formalised restrictions because such activities have widespread societal approval. In contrast, the imposition of legal restrictions—or even an outright ban—reflect qualified or lack of public support for an activity. This review discusses current threats to equestrianism’s SLO and suggests actions that those across the equine sector need to take to justify the continuation of the SLO. The most important of these is earning the trust of all stakeholders, including the public. Trust requires transparency of operations, establishment and communication of shared values, and demonstration of competence. These attributes can only be gained by taking an ethics-based, proactive, progressive, and holistic approach to the protection of equine welfare. Animal-use activities that have faced challenges to their SLO have achieved variable success in re-establishing the approval of society, and equestrianism can learn from the experience of these groups as it maps its future. The associated effort and cost should be regarded as an investment in the future of the sport. MDPI 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9367437/ /pubmed/35953977 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12151987 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Douglas, Janet
Owers, Roly
Campbell, Madeleine L. H.
Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries?
title Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries?
title_full Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries?
title_fullStr Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries?
title_full_unstemmed Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries?
title_short Social Licence to Operate: What Can Equestrian Sports Learn from Other Industries?
title_sort social licence to operate: what can equestrian sports learn from other industries?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12151987
work_keys_str_mv AT douglasjanet sociallicencetooperatewhatcanequestriansportslearnfromotherindustries
AT owersroly sociallicencetooperatewhatcanequestriansportslearnfromotherindustries
AT campbellmadeleinelh sociallicencetooperatewhatcanequestriansportslearnfromotherindustries