Cargando…
Differences in Treatment Modalities and Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Two-Center Propensity Score-Matched Study
SIMPLE SUMMARY: The standard of care for patients with ovarian cancer is well established. While the prognosis of younger patients has improved significantly, the survival of older patients remains low. Reasons accounting for the poor survival among older patients are controversial. This study aimed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153655 |
Sumario: | SIMPLE SUMMARY: The standard of care for patients with ovarian cancer is well established. While the prognosis of younger patients has improved significantly, the survival of older patients remains low. Reasons accounting for the poor survival among older patients are controversial. This study aimed to describe the difference in treatment received by older patients in China and to evaluate the prognostic significance of both chronological age and different treatment modalities using a propensity score-matched cohort. Cytoreduction with no residual tumor and the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy were the most important prognostic factors. Chronological age, however, had no influence on recurrence. This relatively large case–controlled study provides evidence that the difference between the standard of care and the treatment of older patients was the main reason that handicaps the efficacy of therapy. ABSTRACT: Background: The prognosis of older patients with ovarian cancer is poor. We evaluated the effect of chronological age and different treatment characteristics on the prognosis of older patients with ovarian cancer; Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed patients aged over 60 years who underwent cytoreduction followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2011 and December 2019 in two national centers in China. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1) was performed to stratify the comorbidity- and treatment-related factors. The Kaplan–Meier method was employed to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) in the original cohort and the cohort after PSM; Results: A total of 324 patients were evaluated. The Age ≥ 70 group often received more neoadjuvant chemotherapy (62.3% vs. 31.2%, p < 0.001), more discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy (31.2% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.001), and had more severe chemotherapy-related toxicity (45.6% vs. 34.2%, p = 0.040) than the Age < 70 group. After matching, the PFS of the Age < 70 group was not significantly different from the Age ≥ 70 group (median PFS = 12.4 and 11.9 months, respectively, p = 0.850). Furthermore, the advanced FIGO stage, non-R0 cytoreduction, and discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy were all found to be poor prognostic factors. Serum albumin level <40 g/L (HR = 2.441, p = 0.018) and age ≥ 70 years (HR = 2.639, p = 0.008) led to more severe chemotherapy-related toxicity. Additionally, poor renal function (HR = 5.128, p = 0.002) was in association with discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy; Conclusions: The chronological age of older patients cannot be seen as a poor prognostic factor. Older patients may benefit most from R0 cytoreduction followed by the completion of chemotherapy. Postoperative poor renal function and serum albumin level <40 g/L may help predict the discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy. |
---|