Cargando…

Traditional Systemic Treatment Options in Advanced Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer after Successful Cytoreduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Low-Grade Serous Ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is considered less sensitive to traditional chemotherapy than its high-grade counterpart. Guidelines are still inconsistent around the use and value of cytotoxic and antihormonal agents in the adjuvant setting. Traditional cytotoxic or antihorm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montero-Macías, Rosa, Rigolet, Pascal, Mikhael, Elie, Krell, Jonathan, Villefranque, Vincent, Lecuru, Fabrice, Fotopoulou, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153681
_version_ 1784765822833524736
author Montero-Macías, Rosa
Rigolet, Pascal
Mikhael, Elie
Krell, Jonathan
Villefranque, Vincent
Lecuru, Fabrice
Fotopoulou, Christina
author_facet Montero-Macías, Rosa
Rigolet, Pascal
Mikhael, Elie
Krell, Jonathan
Villefranque, Vincent
Lecuru, Fabrice
Fotopoulou, Christina
author_sort Montero-Macías, Rosa
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Low-Grade Serous Ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is considered less sensitive to traditional chemotherapy than its high-grade counterpart. Guidelines are still inconsistent around the use and value of cytotoxic and antihormonal agents in the adjuvant setting. Traditional cytotoxic or antihormonal systemic treatment option is not associated with a significant OS or PFS benefit in this Meta-analysis. ABSTRACT: Objective: We performed a systematic literature review and a subsequent meta-analysis to compare traditional treatment options, i.e., antihormonal and cytotoxic, in LGSOC. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in MEDBASE and MEDLINE between September 2000 and June 2021 for women who received cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or antihormonal treatment after primary cytoreduction due to stage II–IV LGSOC and also at relapse. PFS and OS were calculated depending on the type of their adjuvant treatment. For each endpoint in the meta-analysis, pooled HR was calculated using the random effect model with the inverse variance weighted method. Only primary patients were included in the subsequent meta-analysis due to the small number of studies in the relapsed setting. Results: Five eligible first-line studies were included. Systemic chemotherapy failed to provide a significant OS benefit when compared to no systemic treatment (pooled HR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.79, 1.29]) after successful cytoreduction. Moreover, systemic chemotherapy followed by antihormonal treatment also did not result to a significant PFS or OS benefit when compared to systemic chemotherapy alone (for PSF: pooled HR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.33, 1.04]; for OS: pooled HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.50, 1.39]). There were insufficient data from studies in the recurrent setting to allow their inclusion in the meta-analysis. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, we failed to identify a traditional cytotoxic or antihormonal systemic treatment option that was associated with a significant OS or PFS benefit when administered following successful cytoreduction for advanced LGSOC. Prospective randomized studies are urgently warranted to define optimal adjuvant options in this challenging disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9367493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93674932022-08-12 Traditional Systemic Treatment Options in Advanced Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer after Successful Cytoreduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Montero-Macías, Rosa Rigolet, Pascal Mikhael, Elie Krell, Jonathan Villefranque, Vincent Lecuru, Fabrice Fotopoulou, Christina Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Low-Grade Serous Ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is considered less sensitive to traditional chemotherapy than its high-grade counterpart. Guidelines are still inconsistent around the use and value of cytotoxic and antihormonal agents in the adjuvant setting. Traditional cytotoxic or antihormonal systemic treatment option is not associated with a significant OS or PFS benefit in this Meta-analysis. ABSTRACT: Objective: We performed a systematic literature review and a subsequent meta-analysis to compare traditional treatment options, i.e., antihormonal and cytotoxic, in LGSOC. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in MEDBASE and MEDLINE between September 2000 and June 2021 for women who received cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or antihormonal treatment after primary cytoreduction due to stage II–IV LGSOC and also at relapse. PFS and OS were calculated depending on the type of their adjuvant treatment. For each endpoint in the meta-analysis, pooled HR was calculated using the random effect model with the inverse variance weighted method. Only primary patients were included in the subsequent meta-analysis due to the small number of studies in the relapsed setting. Results: Five eligible first-line studies were included. Systemic chemotherapy failed to provide a significant OS benefit when compared to no systemic treatment (pooled HR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.79, 1.29]) after successful cytoreduction. Moreover, systemic chemotherapy followed by antihormonal treatment also did not result to a significant PFS or OS benefit when compared to systemic chemotherapy alone (for PSF: pooled HR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.33, 1.04]; for OS: pooled HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.50, 1.39]). There were insufficient data from studies in the recurrent setting to allow their inclusion in the meta-analysis. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, we failed to identify a traditional cytotoxic or antihormonal systemic treatment option that was associated with a significant OS or PFS benefit when administered following successful cytoreduction for advanced LGSOC. Prospective randomized studies are urgently warranted to define optimal adjuvant options in this challenging disease. MDPI 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9367493/ /pubmed/35954344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153681 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Montero-Macías, Rosa
Rigolet, Pascal
Mikhael, Elie
Krell, Jonathan
Villefranque, Vincent
Lecuru, Fabrice
Fotopoulou, Christina
Traditional Systemic Treatment Options in Advanced Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer after Successful Cytoreduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Traditional Systemic Treatment Options in Advanced Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer after Successful Cytoreduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Traditional Systemic Treatment Options in Advanced Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer after Successful Cytoreduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Traditional Systemic Treatment Options in Advanced Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer after Successful Cytoreduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Traditional Systemic Treatment Options in Advanced Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer after Successful Cytoreduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Traditional Systemic Treatment Options in Advanced Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer after Successful Cytoreduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort traditional systemic treatment options in advanced low-grade serous ovarian cancer after successful cytoreduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153681
work_keys_str_mv AT monteromaciasrosa traditionalsystemictreatmentoptionsinadvancedlowgradeserousovariancanceraftersuccessfulcytoreductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rigoletpascal traditionalsystemictreatmentoptionsinadvancedlowgradeserousovariancanceraftersuccessfulcytoreductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mikhaelelie traditionalsystemictreatmentoptionsinadvancedlowgradeserousovariancanceraftersuccessfulcytoreductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT krelljonathan traditionalsystemictreatmentoptionsinadvancedlowgradeserousovariancanceraftersuccessfulcytoreductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT villefranquevincent traditionalsystemictreatmentoptionsinadvancedlowgradeserousovariancanceraftersuccessfulcytoreductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lecurufabrice traditionalsystemictreatmentoptionsinadvancedlowgradeserousovariancanceraftersuccessfulcytoreductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fotopoulouchristina traditionalsystemictreatmentoptionsinadvancedlowgradeserousovariancanceraftersuccessfulcytoreductionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis