Cargando…

Workplace Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Based on Employees Physical Activity Levels

Introduction: Lack of time, management support, insufficient facilitates, workload balance, and culture are often reported as common barriers to physical activity (PA) participation in the workplace. In comparison, identifying facilitators of PA in the workplace are scarce. A ‘one-size-fits-all’ app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Safi, Ayazullah, Cole, Matthew, Kelly, Adam L., Zariwala, Mohammed Gulrez, Walker, Natalie C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159442
_version_ 1784765891289808896
author Safi, Ayazullah
Cole, Matthew
Kelly, Adam L.
Zariwala, Mohammed Gulrez
Walker, Natalie C.
author_facet Safi, Ayazullah
Cole, Matthew
Kelly, Adam L.
Zariwala, Mohammed Gulrez
Walker, Natalie C.
author_sort Safi, Ayazullah
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Lack of time, management support, insufficient facilitates, workload balance, and culture are often reported as common barriers to physical activity (PA) participation in the workplace. In comparison, identifying facilitators of PA in the workplace are scarce. A ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to overcoming the barriers may also be unsuccessful within university settings where multidisciplinary workforce exists due to the heterogeneity nature of job roles. Thus, the aim of this study was to understand the perceived barriers and facilitators of PA of university employees who were classified as active or inactive based on their job roles. Methods: Forty-one employees (female = 17; male = 24) participated in focus groups to discuss their perceived barriers and facilitators to PA in the workplace. Participants were categorised based on their PA levels as active and inactive prior analysing the semi-structured focus groups data via using thematic analysis. Results and Discussion: The results showed that a lack of time was reported by 80% of the participants as a barrier to PA, including 63% inactive and 17% of the active participants. This included 27% administrators’ staff, 23% academics, 19% senior management, and 11% professional service staff. Over 75% participants reported a lack of management support as one of the perceived barriers to their PA engagement in the workplace. Approximately 58% also reported workplace culture as a barrier to PA participation. Open access to a gym on campus was perceived to be the main facilitator to engaging in PA in the future. Similarly, increased management support for engaging in PA and having flexibility during working days were perceived as facilitators for PA engagement and a way to reduced sedentary behaviour in the workplace. Conclusions: These findings contribute to the limited literature in terms of evaluating obstacles and facilitators of university employees to encourage engagement with PA in the workplace. These findings can be applied to form PA, health, and wellbeing-related interventions specifically targeting these identified barriers that are experienced in the workplace and thereby potentially reducing absenteeism and increasing productivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9367711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93677112022-08-12 Workplace Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Based on Employees Physical Activity Levels Safi, Ayazullah Cole, Matthew Kelly, Adam L. Zariwala, Mohammed Gulrez Walker, Natalie C. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Introduction: Lack of time, management support, insufficient facilitates, workload balance, and culture are often reported as common barriers to physical activity (PA) participation in the workplace. In comparison, identifying facilitators of PA in the workplace are scarce. A ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to overcoming the barriers may also be unsuccessful within university settings where multidisciplinary workforce exists due to the heterogeneity nature of job roles. Thus, the aim of this study was to understand the perceived barriers and facilitators of PA of university employees who were classified as active or inactive based on their job roles. Methods: Forty-one employees (female = 17; male = 24) participated in focus groups to discuss their perceived barriers and facilitators to PA in the workplace. Participants were categorised based on their PA levels as active and inactive prior analysing the semi-structured focus groups data via using thematic analysis. Results and Discussion: The results showed that a lack of time was reported by 80% of the participants as a barrier to PA, including 63% inactive and 17% of the active participants. This included 27% administrators’ staff, 23% academics, 19% senior management, and 11% professional service staff. Over 75% participants reported a lack of management support as one of the perceived barriers to their PA engagement in the workplace. Approximately 58% also reported workplace culture as a barrier to PA participation. Open access to a gym on campus was perceived to be the main facilitator to engaging in PA in the future. Similarly, increased management support for engaging in PA and having flexibility during working days were perceived as facilitators for PA engagement and a way to reduced sedentary behaviour in the workplace. Conclusions: These findings contribute to the limited literature in terms of evaluating obstacles and facilitators of university employees to encourage engagement with PA in the workplace. These findings can be applied to form PA, health, and wellbeing-related interventions specifically targeting these identified barriers that are experienced in the workplace and thereby potentially reducing absenteeism and increasing productivity. MDPI 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9367711/ /pubmed/35954798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159442 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Safi, Ayazullah
Cole, Matthew
Kelly, Adam L.
Zariwala, Mohammed Gulrez
Walker, Natalie C.
Workplace Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Based on Employees Physical Activity Levels
title Workplace Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Based on Employees Physical Activity Levels
title_full Workplace Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Based on Employees Physical Activity Levels
title_fullStr Workplace Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Based on Employees Physical Activity Levels
title_full_unstemmed Workplace Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Based on Employees Physical Activity Levels
title_short Workplace Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Based on Employees Physical Activity Levels
title_sort workplace physical activity barriers and facilitators: a qualitative study based on employees physical activity levels
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159442
work_keys_str_mv AT safiayazullah workplacephysicalactivitybarriersandfacilitatorsaqualitativestudybasedonemployeesphysicalactivitylevels
AT colematthew workplacephysicalactivitybarriersandfacilitatorsaqualitativestudybasedonemployeesphysicalactivitylevels
AT kellyadaml workplacephysicalactivitybarriersandfacilitatorsaqualitativestudybasedonemployeesphysicalactivitylevels
AT zariwalamohammedgulrez workplacephysicalactivitybarriersandfacilitatorsaqualitativestudybasedonemployeesphysicalactivitylevels
AT walkernataliec workplacephysicalactivitybarriersandfacilitatorsaqualitativestudybasedonemployeesphysicalactivitylevels