Cargando…

The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance

Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) features short, repeated bursts of relatively vigorous exercise with intermittent periods of rest or low-intensity exercise. High-intensity power training (HIPT), in combination with HIIT and traditional resistance training (TRT), is characterized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Yu-Hua, Chou, Yi-Chen, Chang, Yun-Chi, Tan, Kok-Hwa, Wu, Mei-Hsuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954756
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159400
_version_ 1784765907117015040
author Chang, Yu-Hua
Chou, Yi-Chen
Chang, Yun-Chi
Tan, Kok-Hwa
Wu, Mei-Hsuan
author_facet Chang, Yu-Hua
Chou, Yi-Chen
Chang, Yun-Chi
Tan, Kok-Hwa
Wu, Mei-Hsuan
author_sort Chang, Yu-Hua
collection PubMed
description Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) features short, repeated bursts of relatively vigorous exercise with intermittent periods of rest or low-intensity exercise. High-intensity power training (HIPT), in combination with HIIT and traditional resistance training (TRT), is characterized as multijoint high-intensity resistance exercises with low interset rest periods. HIPT requires people to finish the exercise as fast as possible, which increases acute physiological demands. The aim of the study was to investigate the differences between eight-week HIPT or TRT on exercise performance. Methods: Twenty-four college students were recruited and randomly assigned to either the HIPT or TRT group in a counterbalanced order. The power of upper and lower limbs (50% 1RM bench press and vertical jump) and anaerobic power were tested before and after the training (weeks 0 and 9). The results were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Friedman’s test with a significance level of α = 0.05 to compare the effects of the intervention on exercise performance. Results: There were significant differences in the explosive force of the upper and lower limbs between the pretest and post-test in both the HIPT and TRT groups (p < 0.05). However, only the HIPT group showed a significant difference in the mean power on the Wingate anaerobic test between the pretest and post-test (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both HIPT and TRT can improve upper and lower limb explosive force. HIPT is an efficient training protocol, which took less time and produced a better improvement in mean anaerobic power.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9367759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93677592022-08-12 The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance Chang, Yu-Hua Chou, Yi-Chen Chang, Yun-Chi Tan, Kok-Hwa Wu, Mei-Hsuan Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) features short, repeated bursts of relatively vigorous exercise with intermittent periods of rest or low-intensity exercise. High-intensity power training (HIPT), in combination with HIIT and traditional resistance training (TRT), is characterized as multijoint high-intensity resistance exercises with low interset rest periods. HIPT requires people to finish the exercise as fast as possible, which increases acute physiological demands. The aim of the study was to investigate the differences between eight-week HIPT or TRT on exercise performance. Methods: Twenty-four college students were recruited and randomly assigned to either the HIPT or TRT group in a counterbalanced order. The power of upper and lower limbs (50% 1RM bench press and vertical jump) and anaerobic power were tested before and after the training (weeks 0 and 9). The results were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Friedman’s test with a significance level of α = 0.05 to compare the effects of the intervention on exercise performance. Results: There were significant differences in the explosive force of the upper and lower limbs between the pretest and post-test in both the HIPT and TRT groups (p < 0.05). However, only the HIPT group showed a significant difference in the mean power on the Wingate anaerobic test between the pretest and post-test (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both HIPT and TRT can improve upper and lower limb explosive force. HIPT is an efficient training protocol, which took less time and produced a better improvement in mean anaerobic power. MDPI 2022-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9367759/ /pubmed/35954756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159400 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chang, Yu-Hua
Chou, Yi-Chen
Chang, Yun-Chi
Tan, Kok-Hwa
Wu, Mei-Hsuan
The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance
title The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance
title_full The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance
title_fullStr The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance
title_short The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance
title_sort effects of high-intensity power training versus traditional resistance training on exercise performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954756
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159400
work_keys_str_mv AT changyuhua theeffectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance
AT chouyichen theeffectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance
AT changyunchi theeffectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance
AT tankokhwa theeffectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance
AT wumeihsuan theeffectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance
AT changyuhua effectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance
AT chouyichen effectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance
AT changyunchi effectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance
AT tankokhwa effectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance
AT wumeihsuan effectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance