Cargando…
The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance
Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) features short, repeated bursts of relatively vigorous exercise with intermittent periods of rest or low-intensity exercise. High-intensity power training (HIPT), in combination with HIIT and traditional resistance training (TRT), is characterized...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159400 |
_version_ | 1784765907117015040 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Yu-Hua Chou, Yi-Chen Chang, Yun-Chi Tan, Kok-Hwa Wu, Mei-Hsuan |
author_facet | Chang, Yu-Hua Chou, Yi-Chen Chang, Yun-Chi Tan, Kok-Hwa Wu, Mei-Hsuan |
author_sort | Chang, Yu-Hua |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) features short, repeated bursts of relatively vigorous exercise with intermittent periods of rest or low-intensity exercise. High-intensity power training (HIPT), in combination with HIIT and traditional resistance training (TRT), is characterized as multijoint high-intensity resistance exercises with low interset rest periods. HIPT requires people to finish the exercise as fast as possible, which increases acute physiological demands. The aim of the study was to investigate the differences between eight-week HIPT or TRT on exercise performance. Methods: Twenty-four college students were recruited and randomly assigned to either the HIPT or TRT group in a counterbalanced order. The power of upper and lower limbs (50% 1RM bench press and vertical jump) and anaerobic power were tested before and after the training (weeks 0 and 9). The results were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Friedman’s test with a significance level of α = 0.05 to compare the effects of the intervention on exercise performance. Results: There were significant differences in the explosive force of the upper and lower limbs between the pretest and post-test in both the HIPT and TRT groups (p < 0.05). However, only the HIPT group showed a significant difference in the mean power on the Wingate anaerobic test between the pretest and post-test (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both HIPT and TRT can improve upper and lower limb explosive force. HIPT is an efficient training protocol, which took less time and produced a better improvement in mean anaerobic power. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9367759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93677592022-08-12 The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance Chang, Yu-Hua Chou, Yi-Chen Chang, Yun-Chi Tan, Kok-Hwa Wu, Mei-Hsuan Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) features short, repeated bursts of relatively vigorous exercise with intermittent periods of rest or low-intensity exercise. High-intensity power training (HIPT), in combination with HIIT and traditional resistance training (TRT), is characterized as multijoint high-intensity resistance exercises with low interset rest periods. HIPT requires people to finish the exercise as fast as possible, which increases acute physiological demands. The aim of the study was to investigate the differences between eight-week HIPT or TRT on exercise performance. Methods: Twenty-four college students were recruited and randomly assigned to either the HIPT or TRT group in a counterbalanced order. The power of upper and lower limbs (50% 1RM bench press and vertical jump) and anaerobic power were tested before and after the training (weeks 0 and 9). The results were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Friedman’s test with a significance level of α = 0.05 to compare the effects of the intervention on exercise performance. Results: There were significant differences in the explosive force of the upper and lower limbs between the pretest and post-test in both the HIPT and TRT groups (p < 0.05). However, only the HIPT group showed a significant difference in the mean power on the Wingate anaerobic test between the pretest and post-test (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both HIPT and TRT can improve upper and lower limb explosive force. HIPT is an efficient training protocol, which took less time and produced a better improvement in mean anaerobic power. MDPI 2022-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9367759/ /pubmed/35954756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159400 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chang, Yu-Hua Chou, Yi-Chen Chang, Yun-Chi Tan, Kok-Hwa Wu, Mei-Hsuan The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance |
title | The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance |
title_full | The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance |
title_fullStr | The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance |
title_short | The Effects of High-Intensity Power Training versus Traditional Resistance Training on Exercise Performance |
title_sort | effects of high-intensity power training versus traditional resistance training on exercise performance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954756 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changyuhua theeffectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance AT chouyichen theeffectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance AT changyunchi theeffectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance AT tankokhwa theeffectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance AT wumeihsuan theeffectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance AT changyuhua effectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance AT chouyichen effectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance AT changyunchi effectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance AT tankokhwa effectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance AT wumeihsuan effectsofhighintensitypowertrainingversustraditionalresistancetrainingonexerciseperformance |