Cargando…

Channeled PM(10), PM(2.5) and PM(1) Emission Factors Associated with the Ceramic Process and Abatement Technologies

A sampling methodology and a mathematical data treatment were developed that enable to determine not only total suspended particulates (TSP) emitted at channeled sources but also the PM(10), PM(2.5), and PM(1) mass fractions (w(10), w(2.5), and w(1)) and emission factors (E.F.), using a seven-stage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Celades, Irina, Sanfelix, Vicenta, López-Lilao, Ana, Gomar, Salvador, Escrig, Alberto, Monfort, Eliseo, Querol, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35955006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159652
_version_ 1784765913286836224
author Celades, Irina
Sanfelix, Vicenta
López-Lilao, Ana
Gomar, Salvador
Escrig, Alberto
Monfort, Eliseo
Querol, Xavier
author_facet Celades, Irina
Sanfelix, Vicenta
López-Lilao, Ana
Gomar, Salvador
Escrig, Alberto
Monfort, Eliseo
Querol, Xavier
author_sort Celades, Irina
collection PubMed
description A sampling methodology and a mathematical data treatment were developed that enable to determine not only total suspended particulates (TSP) emitted at channeled sources but also the PM(10), PM(2.5), and PM(1) mass fractions (w(10), w(2.5), and w(1)) and emission factors (E.F.), using a seven-stage cascade impactor. Moreover, a chemical analysis was performed to identify the elements present in these emissions. The proposed methodology was applied to different stages of the ceramic process, including ambient temperature (milling, shaping, glazing) and medium–high-temperature (spray-drying, drying, firing, and frit melting) stages. In total, more than 100 measurements were performed (pilot scale and industrial scale), which leads to a measurement time of 1500 h. Related to the mass fractions, in general, the mean values of w(10) after the fabric filters operated at high performance are high and with little dispersion (75–85%), and it is also observed that they are practically independent of the stage considered, i.e., they are not significantly dependent on the initial PSD of the stream to be treated. In the case of the fine fraction w(2.5), the behavior is more complex (w(2.5): 30–60%), probably because the only variable is not the cleaning system, but also the nature of the processed material. Regarding abatement measures, the use of high-efficiency cleaning systems considerably reduces the emission factors obtained for fractions PM(10), PM(2.5), and PM(1). In reference to chemical analysis, the presence of ZrO(2) and Ni in the spray-drying and pressing stages, the significant concentration of ZrO(2) in the glazing stage, the presence of Pb, As, and Zn in the firing stage, and the presence of Zn, Pb, Cd, and As compounds in the frits manufacturing should all be highlighted. Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that the use of some compounds, such as cadmium and lead, has been very limited in the last years and, therefore, presumably, the presence of these elements in the emissions should have been also reduced in the same way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9367777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93677772022-08-12 Channeled PM(10), PM(2.5) and PM(1) Emission Factors Associated with the Ceramic Process and Abatement Technologies Celades, Irina Sanfelix, Vicenta López-Lilao, Ana Gomar, Salvador Escrig, Alberto Monfort, Eliseo Querol, Xavier Int J Environ Res Public Health Article A sampling methodology and a mathematical data treatment were developed that enable to determine not only total suspended particulates (TSP) emitted at channeled sources but also the PM(10), PM(2.5), and PM(1) mass fractions (w(10), w(2.5), and w(1)) and emission factors (E.F.), using a seven-stage cascade impactor. Moreover, a chemical analysis was performed to identify the elements present in these emissions. The proposed methodology was applied to different stages of the ceramic process, including ambient temperature (milling, shaping, glazing) and medium–high-temperature (spray-drying, drying, firing, and frit melting) stages. In total, more than 100 measurements were performed (pilot scale and industrial scale), which leads to a measurement time of 1500 h. Related to the mass fractions, in general, the mean values of w(10) after the fabric filters operated at high performance are high and with little dispersion (75–85%), and it is also observed that they are practically independent of the stage considered, i.e., they are not significantly dependent on the initial PSD of the stream to be treated. In the case of the fine fraction w(2.5), the behavior is more complex (w(2.5): 30–60%), probably because the only variable is not the cleaning system, but also the nature of the processed material. Regarding abatement measures, the use of high-efficiency cleaning systems considerably reduces the emission factors obtained for fractions PM(10), PM(2.5), and PM(1). In reference to chemical analysis, the presence of ZrO(2) and Ni in the spray-drying and pressing stages, the significant concentration of ZrO(2) in the glazing stage, the presence of Pb, As, and Zn in the firing stage, and the presence of Zn, Pb, Cd, and As compounds in the frits manufacturing should all be highlighted. Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that the use of some compounds, such as cadmium and lead, has been very limited in the last years and, therefore, presumably, the presence of these elements in the emissions should have been also reduced in the same way. MDPI 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9367777/ /pubmed/35955006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159652 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Celades, Irina
Sanfelix, Vicenta
López-Lilao, Ana
Gomar, Salvador
Escrig, Alberto
Monfort, Eliseo
Querol, Xavier
Channeled PM(10), PM(2.5) and PM(1) Emission Factors Associated with the Ceramic Process and Abatement Technologies
title Channeled PM(10), PM(2.5) and PM(1) Emission Factors Associated with the Ceramic Process and Abatement Technologies
title_full Channeled PM(10), PM(2.5) and PM(1) Emission Factors Associated with the Ceramic Process and Abatement Technologies
title_fullStr Channeled PM(10), PM(2.5) and PM(1) Emission Factors Associated with the Ceramic Process and Abatement Technologies
title_full_unstemmed Channeled PM(10), PM(2.5) and PM(1) Emission Factors Associated with the Ceramic Process and Abatement Technologies
title_short Channeled PM(10), PM(2.5) and PM(1) Emission Factors Associated with the Ceramic Process and Abatement Technologies
title_sort channeled pm(10), pm(2.5) and pm(1) emission factors associated with the ceramic process and abatement technologies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35955006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159652
work_keys_str_mv AT celadesirina channeledpm10pm25andpm1emissionfactorsassociatedwiththeceramicprocessandabatementtechnologies
AT sanfelixvicenta channeledpm10pm25andpm1emissionfactorsassociatedwiththeceramicprocessandabatementtechnologies
AT lopezlilaoana channeledpm10pm25andpm1emissionfactorsassociatedwiththeceramicprocessandabatementtechnologies
AT gomarsalvador channeledpm10pm25andpm1emissionfactorsassociatedwiththeceramicprocessandabatementtechnologies
AT escrigalberto channeledpm10pm25andpm1emissionfactorsassociatedwiththeceramicprocessandabatementtechnologies
AT monforteliseo channeledpm10pm25andpm1emissionfactorsassociatedwiththeceramicprocessandabatementtechnologies
AT querolxavier channeledpm10pm25andpm1emissionfactorsassociatedwiththeceramicprocessandabatementtechnologies