Cargando…

Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa

Hand sanitizers are used as an alternative to hand washing to reduce the number of viable microorganisms when soap and water are not readily available. This study aimed to investigate the anti-bacterial effectiveness of commercially available hand sanitizers and those commonly used in healthcare and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muleba, Lufuno, Van Wyk, Renay, Pienaar, Jennifer, Ratshikhopha, Edith, Singh, Tanusha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159245
_version_ 1784765919920128000
author Muleba, Lufuno
Van Wyk, Renay
Pienaar, Jennifer
Ratshikhopha, Edith
Singh, Tanusha
author_facet Muleba, Lufuno
Van Wyk, Renay
Pienaar, Jennifer
Ratshikhopha, Edith
Singh, Tanusha
author_sort Muleba, Lufuno
collection PubMed
description Hand sanitizers are used as an alternative to hand washing to reduce the number of viable microorganisms when soap and water are not readily available. This study aimed to investigate the anti-bacterial effectiveness of commercially available hand sanitizers and those commonly used in healthcare and community settings. A mapping exercise was done to select and procure different hand sanitizers (n = 18) from retailers. Five microorganisms implicated in hospital-acquired infections were selected and tested against each hand sanitizer: Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. Twenty-one volunteers were recruited to do a handprint before and after applying the hand sanitizer. Only four out of eighteen hand sanitizers (22%) were effective against all tested bacterial species, and an equal number (22%) were completely ineffective. Seven hand sanitizers with a label claim of 99.99% were only effective against E. coli. Only five hand sanitizers (27%) effectively reduced bacteria on participants’ hands. This study showed that only a fifth of hand sanitizers were effective against selected microorganisms. The findings raise a concern about the effectiveness of hand sanitizers and their role in infection, prevention, and control if not well regulated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9367797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93677972022-08-12 Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa Muleba, Lufuno Van Wyk, Renay Pienaar, Jennifer Ratshikhopha, Edith Singh, Tanusha Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Hand sanitizers are used as an alternative to hand washing to reduce the number of viable microorganisms when soap and water are not readily available. This study aimed to investigate the anti-bacterial effectiveness of commercially available hand sanitizers and those commonly used in healthcare and community settings. A mapping exercise was done to select and procure different hand sanitizers (n = 18) from retailers. Five microorganisms implicated in hospital-acquired infections were selected and tested against each hand sanitizer: Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. Twenty-one volunteers were recruited to do a handprint before and after applying the hand sanitizer. Only four out of eighteen hand sanitizers (22%) were effective against all tested bacterial species, and an equal number (22%) were completely ineffective. Seven hand sanitizers with a label claim of 99.99% were only effective against E. coli. Only five hand sanitizers (27%) effectively reduced bacteria on participants’ hands. This study showed that only a fifth of hand sanitizers were effective against selected microorganisms. The findings raise a concern about the effectiveness of hand sanitizers and their role in infection, prevention, and control if not well regulated. MDPI 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9367797/ /pubmed/35954594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159245 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Muleba, Lufuno
Van Wyk, Renay
Pienaar, Jennifer
Ratshikhopha, Edith
Singh, Tanusha
Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa
title Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa
title_full Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa
title_fullStr Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa
title_short Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa
title_sort assessment of anti-bacterial effectiveness of hand sanitizers commonly used in south africa
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954594
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159245
work_keys_str_mv AT mulebalufuno assessmentofantibacterialeffectivenessofhandsanitizerscommonlyusedinsouthafrica
AT vanwykrenay assessmentofantibacterialeffectivenessofhandsanitizerscommonlyusedinsouthafrica
AT pienaarjennifer assessmentofantibacterialeffectivenessofhandsanitizerscommonlyusedinsouthafrica
AT ratshikhophaedith assessmentofantibacterialeffectivenessofhandsanitizerscommonlyusedinsouthafrica
AT singhtanusha assessmentofantibacterialeffectivenessofhandsanitizerscommonlyusedinsouthafrica