Cargando…
Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa
Hand sanitizers are used as an alternative to hand washing to reduce the number of viable microorganisms when soap and water are not readily available. This study aimed to investigate the anti-bacterial effectiveness of commercially available hand sanitizers and those commonly used in healthcare and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159245 |
_version_ | 1784765919920128000 |
---|---|
author | Muleba, Lufuno Van Wyk, Renay Pienaar, Jennifer Ratshikhopha, Edith Singh, Tanusha |
author_facet | Muleba, Lufuno Van Wyk, Renay Pienaar, Jennifer Ratshikhopha, Edith Singh, Tanusha |
author_sort | Muleba, Lufuno |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hand sanitizers are used as an alternative to hand washing to reduce the number of viable microorganisms when soap and water are not readily available. This study aimed to investigate the anti-bacterial effectiveness of commercially available hand sanitizers and those commonly used in healthcare and community settings. A mapping exercise was done to select and procure different hand sanitizers (n = 18) from retailers. Five microorganisms implicated in hospital-acquired infections were selected and tested against each hand sanitizer: Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. Twenty-one volunteers were recruited to do a handprint before and after applying the hand sanitizer. Only four out of eighteen hand sanitizers (22%) were effective against all tested bacterial species, and an equal number (22%) were completely ineffective. Seven hand sanitizers with a label claim of 99.99% were only effective against E. coli. Only five hand sanitizers (27%) effectively reduced bacteria on participants’ hands. This study showed that only a fifth of hand sanitizers were effective against selected microorganisms. The findings raise a concern about the effectiveness of hand sanitizers and their role in infection, prevention, and control if not well regulated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9367797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93677972022-08-12 Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa Muleba, Lufuno Van Wyk, Renay Pienaar, Jennifer Ratshikhopha, Edith Singh, Tanusha Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Hand sanitizers are used as an alternative to hand washing to reduce the number of viable microorganisms when soap and water are not readily available. This study aimed to investigate the anti-bacterial effectiveness of commercially available hand sanitizers and those commonly used in healthcare and community settings. A mapping exercise was done to select and procure different hand sanitizers (n = 18) from retailers. Five microorganisms implicated in hospital-acquired infections were selected and tested against each hand sanitizer: Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. Twenty-one volunteers were recruited to do a handprint before and after applying the hand sanitizer. Only four out of eighteen hand sanitizers (22%) were effective against all tested bacterial species, and an equal number (22%) were completely ineffective. Seven hand sanitizers with a label claim of 99.99% were only effective against E. coli. Only five hand sanitizers (27%) effectively reduced bacteria on participants’ hands. This study showed that only a fifth of hand sanitizers were effective against selected microorganisms. The findings raise a concern about the effectiveness of hand sanitizers and their role in infection, prevention, and control if not well regulated. MDPI 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9367797/ /pubmed/35954594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159245 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Muleba, Lufuno Van Wyk, Renay Pienaar, Jennifer Ratshikhopha, Edith Singh, Tanusha Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa |
title | Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa |
title_full | Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa |
title_short | Assessment of Anti-Bacterial Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizers Commonly Used in South Africa |
title_sort | assessment of anti-bacterial effectiveness of hand sanitizers commonly used in south africa |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9367797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954594 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mulebalufuno assessmentofantibacterialeffectivenessofhandsanitizerscommonlyusedinsouthafrica AT vanwykrenay assessmentofantibacterialeffectivenessofhandsanitizerscommonlyusedinsouthafrica AT pienaarjennifer assessmentofantibacterialeffectivenessofhandsanitizerscommonlyusedinsouthafrica AT ratshikhophaedith assessmentofantibacterialeffectivenessofhandsanitizerscommonlyusedinsouthafrica AT singhtanusha assessmentofantibacterialeffectivenessofhandsanitizerscommonlyusedinsouthafrica |