Cargando…

Brief Screening for Distress among Healthcare Professionals: Psychometric Properties of the Physician Well-Being Index—Spanish Version

Background: The Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI) is a brief, valid, reliable self-assessment instrument to identify health professionals’ distress and those in need of an intervention. Objective: to evaluate the construct, predictive validity (of depression, suicidal ideation, insomnia, and general...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robles, Rebeca, Fresán, Ana, Alcocer-Castillejos, Natasha, Real-Ramírez, Janet, Morales-Chainé, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954808
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159451
_version_ 1784766023010877440
author Robles, Rebeca
Fresán, Ana
Alcocer-Castillejos, Natasha
Real-Ramírez, Janet
Morales-Chainé, Silvia
author_facet Robles, Rebeca
Fresán, Ana
Alcocer-Castillejos, Natasha
Real-Ramírez, Janet
Morales-Chainé, Silvia
author_sort Robles, Rebeca
collection PubMed
description Background: The Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI) is a brief, valid, reliable self-assessment instrument to identify health professionals’ distress and those in need of an intervention. Objective: to evaluate the construct, predictive validity (of depression, suicidal ideation, insomnia, and generalized anxiety), and internal consistency of the 7-item Spanish version of the PWBI (PWBI-S). Methods: out of a national population of approximately 1 million Mexican healthcare professionals, a sample of 3506 subjects (42.0% physicians, 28.7% nurses and 29.3% psychologists) completed an online survey between 17 April and 7 May 2020, at the time of the COVID-19 case cluster transmission scenario in Mexico. Results: In the three sub-samples, PWBI-S’s Confirmatory factor analyses (adding residual covariances) exhibited adequate goodness of fit indices for the PWBS original unidimensional model. Overall Cronbach’s alphas were 0.89 for physicians, 0.90 for nurses, and 0.86 for psychologists. Univariate logistic regression models showed that a cutoff point of 3 on the total score of the PWBI-S was generally related to the presence of depression, suicidal ideation, and insomnia, but not with generalized anxiety among nurses and psychologists. When trying with a cutoff point of 3, a relationship with GA was shown in psychologists, but not in nurses. Conclusions: our findings suggest that PWBI-S is a valid, reliable measure for clinical and research purposes in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9368125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93681252022-08-12 Brief Screening for Distress among Healthcare Professionals: Psychometric Properties of the Physician Well-Being Index—Spanish Version Robles, Rebeca Fresán, Ana Alcocer-Castillejos, Natasha Real-Ramírez, Janet Morales-Chainé, Silvia Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI) is a brief, valid, reliable self-assessment instrument to identify health professionals’ distress and those in need of an intervention. Objective: to evaluate the construct, predictive validity (of depression, suicidal ideation, insomnia, and generalized anxiety), and internal consistency of the 7-item Spanish version of the PWBI (PWBI-S). Methods: out of a national population of approximately 1 million Mexican healthcare professionals, a sample of 3506 subjects (42.0% physicians, 28.7% nurses and 29.3% psychologists) completed an online survey between 17 April and 7 May 2020, at the time of the COVID-19 case cluster transmission scenario in Mexico. Results: In the three sub-samples, PWBI-S’s Confirmatory factor analyses (adding residual covariances) exhibited adequate goodness of fit indices for the PWBS original unidimensional model. Overall Cronbach’s alphas were 0.89 for physicians, 0.90 for nurses, and 0.86 for psychologists. Univariate logistic regression models showed that a cutoff point of 3 on the total score of the PWBI-S was generally related to the presence of depression, suicidal ideation, and insomnia, but not with generalized anxiety among nurses and psychologists. When trying with a cutoff point of 3, a relationship with GA was shown in psychologists, but not in nurses. Conclusions: our findings suggest that PWBI-S is a valid, reliable measure for clinical and research purposes in the field. MDPI 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9368125/ /pubmed/35954808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159451 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Robles, Rebeca
Fresán, Ana
Alcocer-Castillejos, Natasha
Real-Ramírez, Janet
Morales-Chainé, Silvia
Brief Screening for Distress among Healthcare Professionals: Psychometric Properties of the Physician Well-Being Index—Spanish Version
title Brief Screening for Distress among Healthcare Professionals: Psychometric Properties of the Physician Well-Being Index—Spanish Version
title_full Brief Screening for Distress among Healthcare Professionals: Psychometric Properties of the Physician Well-Being Index—Spanish Version
title_fullStr Brief Screening for Distress among Healthcare Professionals: Psychometric Properties of the Physician Well-Being Index—Spanish Version
title_full_unstemmed Brief Screening for Distress among Healthcare Professionals: Psychometric Properties of the Physician Well-Being Index—Spanish Version
title_short Brief Screening for Distress among Healthcare Professionals: Psychometric Properties of the Physician Well-Being Index—Spanish Version
title_sort brief screening for distress among healthcare professionals: psychometric properties of the physician well-being index—spanish version
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954808
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159451
work_keys_str_mv AT roblesrebeca briefscreeningfordistressamonghealthcareprofessionalspsychometricpropertiesofthephysicianwellbeingindexspanishversion
AT fresanana briefscreeningfordistressamonghealthcareprofessionalspsychometricpropertiesofthephysicianwellbeingindexspanishversion
AT alcocercastillejosnatasha briefscreeningfordistressamonghealthcareprofessionalspsychometricpropertiesofthephysicianwellbeingindexspanishversion
AT realramirezjanet briefscreeningfordistressamonghealthcareprofessionalspsychometricpropertiesofthephysicianwellbeingindexspanishversion
AT moraleschainesilvia briefscreeningfordistressamonghealthcareprofessionalspsychometricpropertiesofthephysicianwellbeingindexspanishversion