Cargando…

A Critical Assessment of the Congruency between Environmental DNA and Palaeoecology for the Biodiversity Monitoring and Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction

The present study suggests that standardized methodology, careful site selection, and stratigraphy are essential for investigating ancient ecosystems in order to evaluate biodiversity and DNA-based time series. Based on specific keywords, this investigation reviewed 146 publications using the SCOPUS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan, Shahnawaz, Khurshid, Zulaykha, Sabreena, Bali, Bikram Singh, Ganai, Bashir Ah, Sayyed, R. Z., Poczai, Peter, Zaman, Muzafar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159445
_version_ 1784766031960473600
author Hassan, Shahnawaz
Khurshid, Zulaykha
Sabreena,
Bali, Bikram Singh
Ganai, Bashir Ah
Sayyed, R. Z.
Poczai, Peter
Zaman, Muzafar
author_facet Hassan, Shahnawaz
Khurshid, Zulaykha
Sabreena,
Bali, Bikram Singh
Ganai, Bashir Ah
Sayyed, R. Z.
Poczai, Peter
Zaman, Muzafar
author_sort Hassan, Shahnawaz
collection PubMed
description The present study suggests that standardized methodology, careful site selection, and stratigraphy are essential for investigating ancient ecosystems in order to evaluate biodiversity and DNA-based time series. Based on specific keywords, this investigation reviewed 146 publications using the SCOPUS, Web of Science (WoS), PUBMED, and Google Scholar databases. Results indicate that environmental deoxyribose nucleic acid (eDNA) can be pivotal for assessing and conserving ecosystems. Our review revealed that in the last 12 years (January 2008–July 2021), 63% of the studies based on eDNA have been reported from aquatic ecosystems, 25% from marine habitats, and 12% from terrestrial environments. Out of studies conducted in aquatic systems using the environmental DNA (eDNA) technique, 63% of the investigations have been reported from freshwater ecosystems, with an utmost focus on fish diversity (40%). Further analysis of the literature reveals that during the same period, 24% of the investigations using the environmental DNA technique were carried out on invertebrates, 8% on mammals, 7% on plants, 6% on reptiles, and 5% on birds. The results obtained clearly indicate that the environmental DNA technique has a clear-cut edge over other biodiversity monitoring methods. Furthermore, we also found that eDNA, in conjunction with different dating techniques, can provide better insight into deciphering eco-evolutionary feedback. Therefore, an attempt has been made to offer extensive information on the application of dating methods for different taxa present in diverse ecosystems. Last, we provide suggestions and elucidations on how to overcome the caveats and delineate some of the research avenues that will likely shape this field in the near future. This paper aims to identify the gaps in environmental DNA (eDNA) investigations to help researchers, ecologists, and decision-makers to develop a holistic understanding of environmental DNA (eDNA) and its utility as a palaeoenvironmental contrivance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9368151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93681512022-08-12 A Critical Assessment of the Congruency between Environmental DNA and Palaeoecology for the Biodiversity Monitoring and Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction Hassan, Shahnawaz Khurshid, Zulaykha Sabreena, Bali, Bikram Singh Ganai, Bashir Ah Sayyed, R. Z. Poczai, Peter Zaman, Muzafar Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The present study suggests that standardized methodology, careful site selection, and stratigraphy are essential for investigating ancient ecosystems in order to evaluate biodiversity and DNA-based time series. Based on specific keywords, this investigation reviewed 146 publications using the SCOPUS, Web of Science (WoS), PUBMED, and Google Scholar databases. Results indicate that environmental deoxyribose nucleic acid (eDNA) can be pivotal for assessing and conserving ecosystems. Our review revealed that in the last 12 years (January 2008–July 2021), 63% of the studies based on eDNA have been reported from aquatic ecosystems, 25% from marine habitats, and 12% from terrestrial environments. Out of studies conducted in aquatic systems using the environmental DNA (eDNA) technique, 63% of the investigations have been reported from freshwater ecosystems, with an utmost focus on fish diversity (40%). Further analysis of the literature reveals that during the same period, 24% of the investigations using the environmental DNA technique were carried out on invertebrates, 8% on mammals, 7% on plants, 6% on reptiles, and 5% on birds. The results obtained clearly indicate that the environmental DNA technique has a clear-cut edge over other biodiversity monitoring methods. Furthermore, we also found that eDNA, in conjunction with different dating techniques, can provide better insight into deciphering eco-evolutionary feedback. Therefore, an attempt has been made to offer extensive information on the application of dating methods for different taxa present in diverse ecosystems. Last, we provide suggestions and elucidations on how to overcome the caveats and delineate some of the research avenues that will likely shape this field in the near future. This paper aims to identify the gaps in environmental DNA (eDNA) investigations to help researchers, ecologists, and decision-makers to develop a holistic understanding of environmental DNA (eDNA) and its utility as a palaeoenvironmental contrivance. MDPI 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9368151/ /pubmed/35954801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159445 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Hassan, Shahnawaz
Khurshid, Zulaykha
Sabreena,
Bali, Bikram Singh
Ganai, Bashir Ah
Sayyed, R. Z.
Poczai, Peter
Zaman, Muzafar
A Critical Assessment of the Congruency between Environmental DNA and Palaeoecology for the Biodiversity Monitoring and Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction
title A Critical Assessment of the Congruency between Environmental DNA and Palaeoecology for the Biodiversity Monitoring and Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction
title_full A Critical Assessment of the Congruency between Environmental DNA and Palaeoecology for the Biodiversity Monitoring and Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction
title_fullStr A Critical Assessment of the Congruency between Environmental DNA and Palaeoecology for the Biodiversity Monitoring and Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed A Critical Assessment of the Congruency between Environmental DNA and Palaeoecology for the Biodiversity Monitoring and Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction
title_short A Critical Assessment of the Congruency between Environmental DNA and Palaeoecology for the Biodiversity Monitoring and Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction
title_sort critical assessment of the congruency between environmental dna and palaeoecology for the biodiversity monitoring and palaeoenvironmental reconstruction
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954801
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159445
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanshahnawaz acriticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT khurshidzulaykha acriticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT sabreena acriticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT balibikramsingh acriticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT ganaibashirah acriticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT sayyedrz acriticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT poczaipeter acriticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT zamanmuzafar acriticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT hassanshahnawaz criticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT khurshidzulaykha criticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT sabreena criticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT balibikramsingh criticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT ganaibashirah criticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT sayyedrz criticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT poczaipeter criticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction
AT zamanmuzafar criticalassessmentofthecongruencybetweenenvironmentaldnaandpalaeoecologyforthebiodiversitymonitoringandpalaeoenvironmentalreconstruction