Cargando…

Real-Life Inter-Rater Variability of the PRAETORIAN Score Values

(1) Background: The PRAETORIAN score is a tool developed for postoperative evaluation of the position of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems. The aim of our study was to evaluate the real-life inter-rater variability of the PRAETORIAN score, based on chest radiographs of S-IC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budrejko, Szymon, Kempa, Maciej, Krupa, Wojciech, Królak, Tomasz, Fabiszak, Tomasz, Raczak, Grzegorz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35955057
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159700
_version_ 1784766111765495808
author Budrejko, Szymon
Kempa, Maciej
Krupa, Wojciech
Królak, Tomasz
Fabiszak, Tomasz
Raczak, Grzegorz
author_facet Budrejko, Szymon
Kempa, Maciej
Krupa, Wojciech
Królak, Tomasz
Fabiszak, Tomasz
Raczak, Grzegorz
author_sort Budrejko, Szymon
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: The PRAETORIAN score is a tool developed for postoperative evaluation of the position of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems. The aim of our study was to evaluate the real-life inter-rater variability of the PRAETORIAN score, based on chest radiographs of S-ICD patients reviewed by independent clinical raters. (2) Methods: Postoperative chest X-rays of patients that underwent S-ICD implantation were evaluated by five clinical raters who gave values of the PRAETORIAN score. Ratings were then compared in a fully crossed manner to determine the inter-rater variability of the attributed scores. (3) Results: In total, 87 patients were included in the study. In the case of the most important final risk category of the PRAETORIAN score, the mean Light’s kappa was 0.804, the Fleiss’ kappa was 0.249, and the intraclass correlation was 0.38. The final risk category was identically determined by all five raters in 75.86% of patients, by four raters in 14.94%, and by three raters in 9.20% of patients. (4) Conclusions: The overall inter-rater variability of the PRAETORIAN score in a group of electrophysiologists experienced in S-ICD implantation, yet previously naive to the PRAETORIAN score, and self-trained in its utilization, was only modest in our study. Appropriate use of the score might require training of clinical raters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9368382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93683822022-08-12 Real-Life Inter-Rater Variability of the PRAETORIAN Score Values Budrejko, Szymon Kempa, Maciej Krupa, Wojciech Królak, Tomasz Fabiszak, Tomasz Raczak, Grzegorz Int J Environ Res Public Health Article (1) Background: The PRAETORIAN score is a tool developed for postoperative evaluation of the position of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems. The aim of our study was to evaluate the real-life inter-rater variability of the PRAETORIAN score, based on chest radiographs of S-ICD patients reviewed by independent clinical raters. (2) Methods: Postoperative chest X-rays of patients that underwent S-ICD implantation were evaluated by five clinical raters who gave values of the PRAETORIAN score. Ratings were then compared in a fully crossed manner to determine the inter-rater variability of the attributed scores. (3) Results: In total, 87 patients were included in the study. In the case of the most important final risk category of the PRAETORIAN score, the mean Light’s kappa was 0.804, the Fleiss’ kappa was 0.249, and the intraclass correlation was 0.38. The final risk category was identically determined by all five raters in 75.86% of patients, by four raters in 14.94%, and by three raters in 9.20% of patients. (4) Conclusions: The overall inter-rater variability of the PRAETORIAN score in a group of electrophysiologists experienced in S-ICD implantation, yet previously naive to the PRAETORIAN score, and self-trained in its utilization, was only modest in our study. Appropriate use of the score might require training of clinical raters. MDPI 2022-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9368382/ /pubmed/35955057 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159700 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Budrejko, Szymon
Kempa, Maciej
Krupa, Wojciech
Królak, Tomasz
Fabiszak, Tomasz
Raczak, Grzegorz
Real-Life Inter-Rater Variability of the PRAETORIAN Score Values
title Real-Life Inter-Rater Variability of the PRAETORIAN Score Values
title_full Real-Life Inter-Rater Variability of the PRAETORIAN Score Values
title_fullStr Real-Life Inter-Rater Variability of the PRAETORIAN Score Values
title_full_unstemmed Real-Life Inter-Rater Variability of the PRAETORIAN Score Values
title_short Real-Life Inter-Rater Variability of the PRAETORIAN Score Values
title_sort real-life inter-rater variability of the praetorian score values
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35955057
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159700
work_keys_str_mv AT budrejkoszymon reallifeinterratervariabilityofthepraetorianscorevalues
AT kempamaciej reallifeinterratervariabilityofthepraetorianscorevalues
AT krupawojciech reallifeinterratervariabilityofthepraetorianscorevalues
AT krolaktomasz reallifeinterratervariabilityofthepraetorianscorevalues
AT fabiszaktomasz reallifeinterratervariabilityofthepraetorianscorevalues
AT raczakgrzegorz reallifeinterratervariabilityofthepraetorianscorevalues