Cargando…

Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy

The aim of this study was to develop an accurate, easy-to-use, and cost-effective method for the detection of chicken adulteration based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and lateral flow strip (LFS). We compared six DNA extraction methods, namely the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Haoyi, Lan, Hangzhen, Pan, Daodong, Xu, Junfeng, Wang, Xiaofu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954117
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11152351
_version_ 1784766123967774720
author Xu, Haoyi
Lan, Hangzhen
Pan, Daodong
Xu, Junfeng
Wang, Xiaofu
author_facet Xu, Haoyi
Lan, Hangzhen
Pan, Daodong
Xu, Junfeng
Wang, Xiaofu
author_sort Xu, Haoyi
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to develop an accurate, easy-to-use, and cost-effective method for the detection of chicken adulteration based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and lateral flow strip (LFS). We compared six DNA extraction methods, namely the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, salt method, urea method, SDS method, guanidine isothiocyanate method, and commercial kit method. The chicken cytb gene was used as a target to design specific primers. The specificity and sensitivity of the PCR-LFS system were tested using a self-assembled lateral flow measurement sensor. The results showed that the DNA concentration obtained by salt methods is up to 533 ± 84 ng µL(−1), is a suitable replacement for commercial kits. The PCR-LFS method exhibits high specificity at an annealing temperature of 62 °C and does not cross-react with other animal sources. This strategy is also highly sensitive, being able to detect 0.1% of chicken in artificial adulterated meat. The results of the test strips can be observed with the naked eye within 5 min, and this result is consistent with the electrophoresis result, demonstrating its high accuracy. Moreover, the detection system has already been successfully used to detect chicken in commercial samples. Hence, this PCR-LFS strategy provides a potential tool to verify the authenticity of chicken.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9368418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93684182022-08-12 Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy Xu, Haoyi Lan, Hangzhen Pan, Daodong Xu, Junfeng Wang, Xiaofu Foods Article The aim of this study was to develop an accurate, easy-to-use, and cost-effective method for the detection of chicken adulteration based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and lateral flow strip (LFS). We compared six DNA extraction methods, namely the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, salt method, urea method, SDS method, guanidine isothiocyanate method, and commercial kit method. The chicken cytb gene was used as a target to design specific primers. The specificity and sensitivity of the PCR-LFS system were tested using a self-assembled lateral flow measurement sensor. The results showed that the DNA concentration obtained by salt methods is up to 533 ± 84 ng µL(−1), is a suitable replacement for commercial kits. The PCR-LFS method exhibits high specificity at an annealing temperature of 62 °C and does not cross-react with other animal sources. This strategy is also highly sensitive, being able to detect 0.1% of chicken in artificial adulterated meat. The results of the test strips can be observed with the naked eye within 5 min, and this result is consistent with the electrophoresis result, demonstrating its high accuracy. Moreover, the detection system has already been successfully used to detect chicken in commercial samples. Hence, this PCR-LFS strategy provides a potential tool to verify the authenticity of chicken. MDPI 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9368418/ /pubmed/35954117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11152351 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xu, Haoyi
Lan, Hangzhen
Pan, Daodong
Xu, Junfeng
Wang, Xiaofu
Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy
title Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy
title_full Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy
title_fullStr Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy
title_short Visual Detection of Chicken Adulteration Based on a Lateral Flow Strip-PCR Strategy
title_sort visual detection of chicken adulteration based on a lateral flow strip-pcr strategy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954117
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11152351
work_keys_str_mv AT xuhaoyi visualdetectionofchickenadulterationbasedonalateralflowstrippcrstrategy
AT lanhangzhen visualdetectionofchickenadulterationbasedonalateralflowstrippcrstrategy
AT pandaodong visualdetectionofchickenadulterationbasedonalateralflowstrippcrstrategy
AT xujunfeng visualdetectionofchickenadulterationbasedonalateralflowstrippcrstrategy
AT wangxiaofu visualdetectionofchickenadulterationbasedonalateralflowstrippcrstrategy