Cargando…

Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations

Vaccine hesitation is a topic of utmost importance, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as a clear reminder of its timeliness. Besides evaluating COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a sample of Portuguese people, this study aims at understanding cognitive and emotional representations related to vaccinati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinho, Simão, Cruz, Mariana, Dias, Cláudia Camila, Castro-Lopes, José M., Sampaio, Rute
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159268
_version_ 1784766139429027840
author Pinho, Simão
Cruz, Mariana
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Castro-Lopes, José M.
Sampaio, Rute
author_facet Pinho, Simão
Cruz, Mariana
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Castro-Lopes, José M.
Sampaio, Rute
author_sort Pinho, Simão
collection PubMed
description Vaccine hesitation is a topic of utmost importance, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as a clear reminder of its timeliness. Besides evaluating COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a sample of Portuguese people, this study aims at understanding cognitive and emotional representations related to vaccination, and their influence on vaccination hesitation. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 27 December 2020 and 27 January 2021. It assessed cognitive and emotional COVID-19 representations; vaccination status; cognitive and emotional representations of vaccination and perceived necessity and concerns about vaccines. Of 31 × 58 participants, 91% accepted taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Among several other significant findings, women (71.3%) more often considered that the pandemic affected their lives (p < 0.001) and were more often concerned with being infected (p < 0.001). Likewise, there were significantly more female participants concerned about taking a COVID-19 vaccine and its possible effects, when compared to the number of male participants (p < 0.001). The number of participants with a higher education level that were more worried about becoming infected was greater (p = 0.001), when compared with those less educated. Regarding age groups, people aged 18 to 24 had fewer concerned participants (9.6%), while the number of individuals aged 55 to 64 had the most (p < 0.001). Somewhat surprisingly, perceiving oneself as extremely informed about COVID-19 was not associated with greater vaccine acceptance (OR = 1.534 [1.160–2.029]; (p = 0.003)). Moreover, people aged 25 to 64 years old and with lower education level were more likely not to accept vaccination (OR = 2.799 [1.085–7.221]; (p = 0.033)). Finally, being more concerned about taking a vaccine lowers its acceptance (OR = 4.001 [2.518–6.356]; (p < 0.001)). Cognitive and emotional representations have a great impact and are reliable predictors of vaccine acceptance. Thus, it is of extreme importance that public health messages be adapted to the different characteristics of the population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9368462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93684622022-08-12 Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations Pinho, Simão Cruz, Mariana Dias, Cláudia Camila Castro-Lopes, José M. Sampaio, Rute Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Vaccine hesitation is a topic of utmost importance, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as a clear reminder of its timeliness. Besides evaluating COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a sample of Portuguese people, this study aims at understanding cognitive and emotional representations related to vaccination, and their influence on vaccination hesitation. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 27 December 2020 and 27 January 2021. It assessed cognitive and emotional COVID-19 representations; vaccination status; cognitive and emotional representations of vaccination and perceived necessity and concerns about vaccines. Of 31 × 58 participants, 91% accepted taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Among several other significant findings, women (71.3%) more often considered that the pandemic affected their lives (p < 0.001) and were more often concerned with being infected (p < 0.001). Likewise, there were significantly more female participants concerned about taking a COVID-19 vaccine and its possible effects, when compared to the number of male participants (p < 0.001). The number of participants with a higher education level that were more worried about becoming infected was greater (p = 0.001), when compared with those less educated. Regarding age groups, people aged 18 to 24 had fewer concerned participants (9.6%), while the number of individuals aged 55 to 64 had the most (p < 0.001). Somewhat surprisingly, perceiving oneself as extremely informed about COVID-19 was not associated with greater vaccine acceptance (OR = 1.534 [1.160–2.029]; (p = 0.003)). Moreover, people aged 25 to 64 years old and with lower education level were more likely not to accept vaccination (OR = 2.799 [1.085–7.221]; (p = 0.033)). Finally, being more concerned about taking a vaccine lowers its acceptance (OR = 4.001 [2.518–6.356]; (p < 0.001)). Cognitive and emotional representations have a great impact and are reliable predictors of vaccine acceptance. Thus, it is of extreme importance that public health messages be adapted to the different characteristics of the population. MDPI 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9368462/ /pubmed/35954625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159268 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pinho, Simão
Cruz, Mariana
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Castro-Lopes, José M.
Sampaio, Rute
Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations
title Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations
title_full Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations
title_fullStr Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations
title_full_unstemmed Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations
title_short Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations
title_sort acceptance and adherence to covid-19 vaccination—the role of cognitive and emotional representations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159268
work_keys_str_mv AT pinhosimao acceptanceandadherencetocovid19vaccinationtheroleofcognitiveandemotionalrepresentations
AT cruzmariana acceptanceandadherencetocovid19vaccinationtheroleofcognitiveandemotionalrepresentations
AT diasclaudiacamila acceptanceandadherencetocovid19vaccinationtheroleofcognitiveandemotionalrepresentations
AT castrolopesjosem acceptanceandadherencetocovid19vaccinationtheroleofcognitiveandemotionalrepresentations
AT sampaiorute acceptanceandadherencetocovid19vaccinationtheroleofcognitiveandemotionalrepresentations