Cargando…
Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations
Vaccine hesitation is a topic of utmost importance, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as a clear reminder of its timeliness. Besides evaluating COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a sample of Portuguese people, this study aims at understanding cognitive and emotional representations related to vaccinati...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159268 |
_version_ | 1784766139429027840 |
---|---|
author | Pinho, Simão Cruz, Mariana Dias, Cláudia Camila Castro-Lopes, José M. Sampaio, Rute |
author_facet | Pinho, Simão Cruz, Mariana Dias, Cláudia Camila Castro-Lopes, José M. Sampaio, Rute |
author_sort | Pinho, Simão |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vaccine hesitation is a topic of utmost importance, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as a clear reminder of its timeliness. Besides evaluating COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a sample of Portuguese people, this study aims at understanding cognitive and emotional representations related to vaccination, and their influence on vaccination hesitation. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 27 December 2020 and 27 January 2021. It assessed cognitive and emotional COVID-19 representations; vaccination status; cognitive and emotional representations of vaccination and perceived necessity and concerns about vaccines. Of 31 × 58 participants, 91% accepted taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Among several other significant findings, women (71.3%) more often considered that the pandemic affected their lives (p < 0.001) and were more often concerned with being infected (p < 0.001). Likewise, there were significantly more female participants concerned about taking a COVID-19 vaccine and its possible effects, when compared to the number of male participants (p < 0.001). The number of participants with a higher education level that were more worried about becoming infected was greater (p = 0.001), when compared with those less educated. Regarding age groups, people aged 18 to 24 had fewer concerned participants (9.6%), while the number of individuals aged 55 to 64 had the most (p < 0.001). Somewhat surprisingly, perceiving oneself as extremely informed about COVID-19 was not associated with greater vaccine acceptance (OR = 1.534 [1.160–2.029]; (p = 0.003)). Moreover, people aged 25 to 64 years old and with lower education level were more likely not to accept vaccination (OR = 2.799 [1.085–7.221]; (p = 0.033)). Finally, being more concerned about taking a vaccine lowers its acceptance (OR = 4.001 [2.518–6.356]; (p < 0.001)). Cognitive and emotional representations have a great impact and are reliable predictors of vaccine acceptance. Thus, it is of extreme importance that public health messages be adapted to the different characteristics of the population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9368462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93684622022-08-12 Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations Pinho, Simão Cruz, Mariana Dias, Cláudia Camila Castro-Lopes, José M. Sampaio, Rute Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Vaccine hesitation is a topic of utmost importance, with the COVID-19 pandemic serving as a clear reminder of its timeliness. Besides evaluating COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in a sample of Portuguese people, this study aims at understanding cognitive and emotional representations related to vaccination, and their influence on vaccination hesitation. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between 27 December 2020 and 27 January 2021. It assessed cognitive and emotional COVID-19 representations; vaccination status; cognitive and emotional representations of vaccination and perceived necessity and concerns about vaccines. Of 31 × 58 participants, 91% accepted taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Among several other significant findings, women (71.3%) more often considered that the pandemic affected their lives (p < 0.001) and were more often concerned with being infected (p < 0.001). Likewise, there were significantly more female participants concerned about taking a COVID-19 vaccine and its possible effects, when compared to the number of male participants (p < 0.001). The number of participants with a higher education level that were more worried about becoming infected was greater (p = 0.001), when compared with those less educated. Regarding age groups, people aged 18 to 24 had fewer concerned participants (9.6%), while the number of individuals aged 55 to 64 had the most (p < 0.001). Somewhat surprisingly, perceiving oneself as extremely informed about COVID-19 was not associated with greater vaccine acceptance (OR = 1.534 [1.160–2.029]; (p = 0.003)). Moreover, people aged 25 to 64 years old and with lower education level were more likely not to accept vaccination (OR = 2.799 [1.085–7.221]; (p = 0.033)). Finally, being more concerned about taking a vaccine lowers its acceptance (OR = 4.001 [2.518–6.356]; (p < 0.001)). Cognitive and emotional representations have a great impact and are reliable predictors of vaccine acceptance. Thus, it is of extreme importance that public health messages be adapted to the different characteristics of the population. MDPI 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9368462/ /pubmed/35954625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159268 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pinho, Simão Cruz, Mariana Dias, Cláudia Camila Castro-Lopes, José M. Sampaio, Rute Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations |
title | Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations |
title_full | Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations |
title_fullStr | Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations |
title_full_unstemmed | Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations |
title_short | Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Vaccination—The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Representations |
title_sort | acceptance and adherence to covid-19 vaccination—the role of cognitive and emotional representations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368462/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35954625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159268 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pinhosimao acceptanceandadherencetocovid19vaccinationtheroleofcognitiveandemotionalrepresentations AT cruzmariana acceptanceandadherencetocovid19vaccinationtheroleofcognitiveandemotionalrepresentations AT diasclaudiacamila acceptanceandadherencetocovid19vaccinationtheroleofcognitiveandemotionalrepresentations AT castrolopesjosem acceptanceandadherencetocovid19vaccinationtheroleofcognitiveandemotionalrepresentations AT sampaiorute acceptanceandadherencetocovid19vaccinationtheroleofcognitiveandemotionalrepresentations |