Cargando…

Comparing the quality of care for long-term ventilated individuals at home versus in shared living communities: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND: People on home mechanical ventilation (HMV) belong to a heterogeneous population with complex care needs. In Germany, outpatient intensive care is provided in people's private home (PH) or in shared living communities (SLC). Increasing patient numbers have led to criticism of the qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klingshirn, Hanna, Gerken, Laura, Hofmann, Katharina, Heuschmann, Peter Ulrich, Haas, Kirsten, Schutzmeier, Martha, Brandstetter, Lilly, Wurmb, Thomas, Kippnich, Maximilian, Reuschenbach, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00986-z
_version_ 1784766219696472064
author Klingshirn, Hanna
Gerken, Laura
Hofmann, Katharina
Heuschmann, Peter Ulrich
Haas, Kirsten
Schutzmeier, Martha
Brandstetter, Lilly
Wurmb, Thomas
Kippnich, Maximilian
Reuschenbach, Bernd
author_facet Klingshirn, Hanna
Gerken, Laura
Hofmann, Katharina
Heuschmann, Peter Ulrich
Haas, Kirsten
Schutzmeier, Martha
Brandstetter, Lilly
Wurmb, Thomas
Kippnich, Maximilian
Reuschenbach, Bernd
author_sort Klingshirn, Hanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People on home mechanical ventilation (HMV) belong to a heterogeneous population with complex care needs. In Germany, outpatient intensive care is provided in people's private home (PH) or in shared living communities (SLC). Increasing patient numbers have led to criticism of the quality of care in recent years. Since quality deficits from the perspective of those affected are largely unclear, the following research question emerged: How do interviews with ventilated individuals and family caregivers explain any differences or similarities in the quality of care between PH and SLC? METHODS: This study used a mixed-methods convergent parallel design, where quantitative and qualitative components were separately collected and analysed. The quantitative component (structured interviews and online survey) included ventilation characteristics, health-related resource use, health-related quality of life (HRQL) measured with the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI; range 0-100; higher scores indicated higher HRQL) and the Burden Scale of the Family Caregivers short version (BSFC-s; range 0-30; higher scores indicated higher burden). The qualitative component (semi-structured interviews) focused on people's experience of person-centred care. Data were merged using a weaving method and the Picker framework of Person-Centred Care. RESULTS: The quantitative component revealed that ventilated individuals living in PHs were on average 20 years younger than participants living in SLCs (n = 46; PH: 46.86 ±15.40 years vs. SLC: 65.07 ±11.78 years; p = .001). HRQL (n = 27; PH: 56.62 ±16.40 vs. SLC: 55.35 ±12.72; p > .999) and the burden of family caregivers (n = 16; PH: 13.20 ±10.18 vs. SLC: 12.64 ±8.55; p > .999) were not significantly different between living situation. The qualitative component revealed that person-centred care is possible in both care settings (ventilated individuals: n = 13; family caregivers: n = 18). CONCLUSION: This study describes a care situation that is as heterogeneous as the population of people with HMV. HRQL and the burden of family caregivers are highly individual and, like person-centred care, independent of the living situation. Policy decisions that facilitate person-centred care need to recognise that quality of care is highly individual and starts with the free choice of the care setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-022-00986-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9368695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93686952022-08-11 Comparing the quality of care for long-term ventilated individuals at home versus in shared living communities: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study Klingshirn, Hanna Gerken, Laura Hofmann, Katharina Heuschmann, Peter Ulrich Haas, Kirsten Schutzmeier, Martha Brandstetter, Lilly Wurmb, Thomas Kippnich, Maximilian Reuschenbach, Bernd BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: People on home mechanical ventilation (HMV) belong to a heterogeneous population with complex care needs. In Germany, outpatient intensive care is provided in people's private home (PH) or in shared living communities (SLC). Increasing patient numbers have led to criticism of the quality of care in recent years. Since quality deficits from the perspective of those affected are largely unclear, the following research question emerged: How do interviews with ventilated individuals and family caregivers explain any differences or similarities in the quality of care between PH and SLC? METHODS: This study used a mixed-methods convergent parallel design, where quantitative and qualitative components were separately collected and analysed. The quantitative component (structured interviews and online survey) included ventilation characteristics, health-related resource use, health-related quality of life (HRQL) measured with the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI; range 0-100; higher scores indicated higher HRQL) and the Burden Scale of the Family Caregivers short version (BSFC-s; range 0-30; higher scores indicated higher burden). The qualitative component (semi-structured interviews) focused on people's experience of person-centred care. Data were merged using a weaving method and the Picker framework of Person-Centred Care. RESULTS: The quantitative component revealed that ventilated individuals living in PHs were on average 20 years younger than participants living in SLCs (n = 46; PH: 46.86 ±15.40 years vs. SLC: 65.07 ±11.78 years; p = .001). HRQL (n = 27; PH: 56.62 ±16.40 vs. SLC: 55.35 ±12.72; p > .999) and the burden of family caregivers (n = 16; PH: 13.20 ±10.18 vs. SLC: 12.64 ±8.55; p > .999) were not significantly different between living situation. The qualitative component revealed that person-centred care is possible in both care settings (ventilated individuals: n = 13; family caregivers: n = 18). CONCLUSION: This study describes a care situation that is as heterogeneous as the population of people with HMV. HRQL and the burden of family caregivers are highly individual and, like person-centred care, independent of the living situation. Policy decisions that facilitate person-centred care need to recognise that quality of care is highly individual and starts with the free choice of the care setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-022-00986-z. BioMed Central 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9368695/ /pubmed/35953810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00986-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Klingshirn, Hanna
Gerken, Laura
Hofmann, Katharina
Heuschmann, Peter Ulrich
Haas, Kirsten
Schutzmeier, Martha
Brandstetter, Lilly
Wurmb, Thomas
Kippnich, Maximilian
Reuschenbach, Bernd
Comparing the quality of care for long-term ventilated individuals at home versus in shared living communities: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study
title Comparing the quality of care for long-term ventilated individuals at home versus in shared living communities: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study
title_full Comparing the quality of care for long-term ventilated individuals at home versus in shared living communities: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Comparing the quality of care for long-term ventilated individuals at home versus in shared living communities: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the quality of care for long-term ventilated individuals at home versus in shared living communities: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study
title_short Comparing the quality of care for long-term ventilated individuals at home versus in shared living communities: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study
title_sort comparing the quality of care for long-term ventilated individuals at home versus in shared living communities: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00986-z
work_keys_str_mv AT klingshirnhanna comparingthequalityofcareforlongtermventilatedindividualsathomeversusinsharedlivingcommunitiesaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsstudy
AT gerkenlaura comparingthequalityofcareforlongtermventilatedindividualsathomeversusinsharedlivingcommunitiesaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsstudy
AT hofmannkatharina comparingthequalityofcareforlongtermventilatedindividualsathomeversusinsharedlivingcommunitiesaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsstudy
AT heuschmannpeterulrich comparingthequalityofcareforlongtermventilatedindividualsathomeversusinsharedlivingcommunitiesaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsstudy
AT haaskirsten comparingthequalityofcareforlongtermventilatedindividualsathomeversusinsharedlivingcommunitiesaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsstudy
AT schutzmeiermartha comparingthequalityofcareforlongtermventilatedindividualsathomeversusinsharedlivingcommunitiesaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsstudy
AT brandstetterlilly comparingthequalityofcareforlongtermventilatedindividualsathomeversusinsharedlivingcommunitiesaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsstudy
AT wurmbthomas comparingthequalityofcareforlongtermventilatedindividualsathomeversusinsharedlivingcommunitiesaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsstudy
AT kippnichmaximilian comparingthequalityofcareforlongtermventilatedindividualsathomeversusinsharedlivingcommunitiesaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsstudy
AT reuschenbachbernd comparingthequalityofcareforlongtermventilatedindividualsathomeversusinsharedlivingcommunitiesaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsstudy