Cargando…

Strategies for oocyte collection and in vitro embryo production in free-roaming bison herds

The study was conducted to test the feasibility of protocols for field collection of cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC) for in vitro embryo production (IVP) in wild bison. The study was done with captive wood bison during the anovulatory season. In Experiment 1, the efficiency of transvaginal ultrasound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zwiefelhofer, Miranda L, Shury, Todd, Zwiefelhofer, Eric M, Singh, Jaswant, Mastromonaco, Gabriela F, Adams, Gregg P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac058
_version_ 1784766260402192384
author Zwiefelhofer, Miranda L
Shury, Todd
Zwiefelhofer, Eric M
Singh, Jaswant
Mastromonaco, Gabriela F
Adams, Gregg P
author_facet Zwiefelhofer, Miranda L
Shury, Todd
Zwiefelhofer, Eric M
Singh, Jaswant
Mastromonaco, Gabriela F
Adams, Gregg P
author_sort Zwiefelhofer, Miranda L
collection PubMed
description The study was conducted to test the feasibility of protocols for field collection of cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC) for in vitro embryo production (IVP) in wild bison. The study was done with captive wood bison during the anovulatory season. In Experiment 1, the efficiency of transvaginal ultrasound-guided COC collection was compared between bison restrained in a squeeze chute without sedation vs in lateral recumbency after chemical immobilization using a dart gun (n = 8/group). In Experiment 2, a 2 × 2 design was used to examine the effects of superstimulation treatment [single dose of equine chorionic gonodotrophin (eCG) vs multiple doses of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)] and method of drug administration (manual injection vs field darting) on COC collection and IVP. In Experiment 1, no difference was detected between chute-restrained vs chemically immobilized groups in the time required to complete COC collections, the number of follicles aspirated (11.5 ± 1.9 vs 9.3 ± 1.8; P = 0.4) or the COC recovery rate [COC recovered/follicle aspirated; 58/92 (63%) vs 44/69 (64%); P = 0.9]. In Experiment 2, no differences were detected between superstimulation treatments (eCG vs FSH). The total number of follicles available for aspiration did not differ between manual injection and field darting (23.9 ± 2.7 vs 21.6 ± 1.9; P = 0.4). Compared with the random start unstimulated group, the embryo production rate was higher [18/132 (14%) vs 53/189 (28%); P = 0.04] after wave synchronization and superstimulation. Results suggest that COC collection is equally feasible in a recumbent position after chemical immobilization as those bison restrained in a standing position in a hydraulic chute. Ovarian superstimulation with a single-dose eCG protocol is as effective as a multiple-dose FSH protocol, and field darting is as effective as chute-side administration of superstimulation treatments. The strategies in the present study are ready to be incorporated into field collections in free-roaming bison herds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9368820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93688202022-08-12 Strategies for oocyte collection and in vitro embryo production in free-roaming bison herds Zwiefelhofer, Miranda L Shury, Todd Zwiefelhofer, Eric M Singh, Jaswant Mastromonaco, Gabriela F Adams, Gregg P Conserv Physiol Research Article The study was conducted to test the feasibility of protocols for field collection of cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC) for in vitro embryo production (IVP) in wild bison. The study was done with captive wood bison during the anovulatory season. In Experiment 1, the efficiency of transvaginal ultrasound-guided COC collection was compared between bison restrained in a squeeze chute without sedation vs in lateral recumbency after chemical immobilization using a dart gun (n = 8/group). In Experiment 2, a 2 × 2 design was used to examine the effects of superstimulation treatment [single dose of equine chorionic gonodotrophin (eCG) vs multiple doses of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)] and method of drug administration (manual injection vs field darting) on COC collection and IVP. In Experiment 1, no difference was detected between chute-restrained vs chemically immobilized groups in the time required to complete COC collections, the number of follicles aspirated (11.5 ± 1.9 vs 9.3 ± 1.8; P = 0.4) or the COC recovery rate [COC recovered/follicle aspirated; 58/92 (63%) vs 44/69 (64%); P = 0.9]. In Experiment 2, no differences were detected between superstimulation treatments (eCG vs FSH). The total number of follicles available for aspiration did not differ between manual injection and field darting (23.9 ± 2.7 vs 21.6 ± 1.9; P = 0.4). Compared with the random start unstimulated group, the embryo production rate was higher [18/132 (14%) vs 53/189 (28%); P = 0.04] after wave synchronization and superstimulation. Results suggest that COC collection is equally feasible in a recumbent position after chemical immobilization as those bison restrained in a standing position in a hydraulic chute. Ovarian superstimulation with a single-dose eCG protocol is as effective as a multiple-dose FSH protocol, and field darting is as effective as chute-side administration of superstimulation treatments. The strategies in the present study are ready to be incorporated into field collections in free-roaming bison herds. Oxford University Press 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9368820/ /pubmed/35966755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac058 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zwiefelhofer, Miranda L
Shury, Todd
Zwiefelhofer, Eric M
Singh, Jaswant
Mastromonaco, Gabriela F
Adams, Gregg P
Strategies for oocyte collection and in vitro embryo production in free-roaming bison herds
title Strategies for oocyte collection and in vitro embryo production in free-roaming bison herds
title_full Strategies for oocyte collection and in vitro embryo production in free-roaming bison herds
title_fullStr Strategies for oocyte collection and in vitro embryo production in free-roaming bison herds
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for oocyte collection and in vitro embryo production in free-roaming bison herds
title_short Strategies for oocyte collection and in vitro embryo production in free-roaming bison herds
title_sort strategies for oocyte collection and in vitro embryo production in free-roaming bison herds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac058
work_keys_str_mv AT zwiefelhofermirandal strategiesforoocytecollectionandinvitroembryoproductioninfreeroamingbisonherds
AT shurytodd strategiesforoocytecollectionandinvitroembryoproductioninfreeroamingbisonherds
AT zwiefelhoferericm strategiesforoocytecollectionandinvitroembryoproductioninfreeroamingbisonherds
AT singhjaswant strategiesforoocytecollectionandinvitroembryoproductioninfreeroamingbisonherds
AT mastromonacogabrielaf strategiesforoocytecollectionandinvitroembryoproductioninfreeroamingbisonherds
AT adamsgreggp strategiesforoocytecollectionandinvitroembryoproductioninfreeroamingbisonherds