Cargando…

Patterns of Brain Sparing in a Fetal Growth Restriction Cohort

Objective: Our objective was to compare differences in Doppler blood flow in four fetal intracranial blood vessels in fetuses with late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) vs. those with small for gestational age (SGA). Methods: Fetuses with estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th percentile were div...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steller, Jon G., Gumina, Diane, Driver, Camille, Peek, Emma, Galan, Henry L., Reeves, Shane, Hobbins, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956097
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154480
_version_ 1784766424068128768
author Steller, Jon G.
Gumina, Diane
Driver, Camille
Peek, Emma
Galan, Henry L.
Reeves, Shane
Hobbins, John C.
author_facet Steller, Jon G.
Gumina, Diane
Driver, Camille
Peek, Emma
Galan, Henry L.
Reeves, Shane
Hobbins, John C.
author_sort Steller, Jon G.
collection PubMed
description Objective: Our objective was to compare differences in Doppler blood flow in four fetal intracranial blood vessels in fetuses with late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) vs. those with small for gestational age (SGA). Methods: Fetuses with estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th percentile were divided into SGA (n = 30) and FGR (n = 51) via Delphi criteria and had Doppler waveforms obtained from the middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior cerebral artery (ACA), posterior cerebral artery (PCA), and vertebral artery (VA). A pulsatility index (PI) <5th centile was considered “abnormal”. Outcomes included birth metrics and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Results: There were more abnormal cerebral vessel PIs in the FGR group versus the SGA group (36 vs. 4; p = 0.055). In FGR, ACA + MCA vessel abnormalities outnumbered PCA + VA abnormalities. All 8 fetuses with abnormal VA PIs had at least one other abnormal vessel. Fetuses with abnormal VA PIs had lower BW (1712 vs. 2500 g; p < 0.0001), delivered earlier (35.22 vs. 37.89 wks; p = 0.0052), and had more admissions to the NICU (71.43% vs. 24.44%; p = 0.023). Conclusions: There were more anterior vessels showing vasodilation than posterior vessels, but when the VA was abnormal, the fetuses were more severely affected clinically than those showing normal VA PIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9369342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93693422022-08-12 Patterns of Brain Sparing in a Fetal Growth Restriction Cohort Steller, Jon G. Gumina, Diane Driver, Camille Peek, Emma Galan, Henry L. Reeves, Shane Hobbins, John C. J Clin Med Article Objective: Our objective was to compare differences in Doppler blood flow in four fetal intracranial blood vessels in fetuses with late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) vs. those with small for gestational age (SGA). Methods: Fetuses with estimated fetal weight (EFW) <10th percentile were divided into SGA (n = 30) and FGR (n = 51) via Delphi criteria and had Doppler waveforms obtained from the middle cerebral artery (MCA), anterior cerebral artery (ACA), posterior cerebral artery (PCA), and vertebral artery (VA). A pulsatility index (PI) <5th centile was considered “abnormal”. Outcomes included birth metrics and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Results: There were more abnormal cerebral vessel PIs in the FGR group versus the SGA group (36 vs. 4; p = 0.055). In FGR, ACA + MCA vessel abnormalities outnumbered PCA + VA abnormalities. All 8 fetuses with abnormal VA PIs had at least one other abnormal vessel. Fetuses with abnormal VA PIs had lower BW (1712 vs. 2500 g; p < 0.0001), delivered earlier (35.22 vs. 37.89 wks; p = 0.0052), and had more admissions to the NICU (71.43% vs. 24.44%; p = 0.023). Conclusions: There were more anterior vessels showing vasodilation than posterior vessels, but when the VA was abnormal, the fetuses were more severely affected clinically than those showing normal VA PIs. MDPI 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9369342/ /pubmed/35956097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154480 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Steller, Jon G.
Gumina, Diane
Driver, Camille
Peek, Emma
Galan, Henry L.
Reeves, Shane
Hobbins, John C.
Patterns of Brain Sparing in a Fetal Growth Restriction Cohort
title Patterns of Brain Sparing in a Fetal Growth Restriction Cohort
title_full Patterns of Brain Sparing in a Fetal Growth Restriction Cohort
title_fullStr Patterns of Brain Sparing in a Fetal Growth Restriction Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of Brain Sparing in a Fetal Growth Restriction Cohort
title_short Patterns of Brain Sparing in a Fetal Growth Restriction Cohort
title_sort patterns of brain sparing in a fetal growth restriction cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956097
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154480
work_keys_str_mv AT stellerjong patternsofbrainsparinginafetalgrowthrestrictioncohort
AT guminadiane patternsofbrainsparinginafetalgrowthrestrictioncohort
AT drivercamille patternsofbrainsparinginafetalgrowthrestrictioncohort
AT peekemma patternsofbrainsparinginafetalgrowthrestrictioncohort
AT galanhenryl patternsofbrainsparinginafetalgrowthrestrictioncohort
AT reevesshane patternsofbrainsparinginafetalgrowthrestrictioncohort
AT hobbinsjohnc patternsofbrainsparinginafetalgrowthrestrictioncohort