Cargando…

Effect of an External Abdominal Compression Device on Polyp Detection during Colonoscopy

AIM: ColoWrap is an external abdominal compression device applied during colonoscopy to reduce looping and procedure time. It is unclear if a shorter procedure duration or increased abdominal pressure impacts polyp detection. We determined if use of ColoWrap affected adenoma detection rate (ADR) or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eluri, Swathi, Runge, Thomas M., Cirri, Holly, Martin, Christopher F., Dellon, Evan S., Crockett, Seth D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966966
http://dx.doi.org/10.17554/j.issn.2224-3992.2018.07.787
_version_ 1784766461364928512
author Eluri, Swathi
Runge, Thomas M.
Cirri, Holly
Martin, Christopher F.
Dellon, Evan S.
Crockett, Seth D.
author_facet Eluri, Swathi
Runge, Thomas M.
Cirri, Holly
Martin, Christopher F.
Dellon, Evan S.
Crockett, Seth D.
author_sort Eluri, Swathi
collection PubMed
description AIM: ColoWrap is an external abdominal compression device applied during colonoscopy to reduce looping and procedure time. It is unclear if a shorter procedure duration or increased abdominal pressure impacts polyp detection. We determined if use of ColoWrap affected adenoma detection rate (ADR) or detection of sessile serrated polyps (SSP) compared to sham. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At a single center, participants aged 40–80 were randomized to have ColoWrap or a sham device applied to the lower abdomen. Baseline characteristics, procedural factors, location of polyps, ADR and SSP detection rate (SSPDR) were compared between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess whether ColoWrap was associated with detection of adenomas and SSP. RESULTS: Of 350 participants, 175 were assigned to each arm. Overall, there were no significant differences in ADR (43% vs 40%, p = 0.52) or SSPDR (8% vs 6%, p = 0.53) between ColoWrap and sham. In sub-group analysis, there were increased odds of adenoma detection with ColoWrap in women (OR: 2.32, 95%CI: 1.21, 4.46), participants > 60 years (OR: 2.95, 95%CI: 1.43, 6.07) and those with a BMI 30–40 (OR: 3.50, 95%CI: 1.00, 12.23). Use of ColoWrap also increased ADR in the left colon (splenic flexure to rectum) (29% vs 22%; p = 0.03) and increased SSPDR in the cecum/ascending colon (6% vs 2%; p = 0.02) compared to sham. CONCLUSION: Use of ColoWrap during colonoscopy did not negatively impact ADR or SSPDR, and there was an apparent improvement in polyp detection in certain colon locations and patient sub-groups. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9369446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93694462022-08-11 Effect of an External Abdominal Compression Device on Polyp Detection during Colonoscopy Eluri, Swathi Runge, Thomas M. Cirri, Holly Martin, Christopher F. Dellon, Evan S. Crockett, Seth D. J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res Article AIM: ColoWrap is an external abdominal compression device applied during colonoscopy to reduce looping and procedure time. It is unclear if a shorter procedure duration or increased abdominal pressure impacts polyp detection. We determined if use of ColoWrap affected adenoma detection rate (ADR) or detection of sessile serrated polyps (SSP) compared to sham. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At a single center, participants aged 40–80 were randomized to have ColoWrap or a sham device applied to the lower abdomen. Baseline characteristics, procedural factors, location of polyps, ADR and SSP detection rate (SSPDR) were compared between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess whether ColoWrap was associated with detection of adenomas and SSP. RESULTS: Of 350 participants, 175 were assigned to each arm. Overall, there were no significant differences in ADR (43% vs 40%, p = 0.52) or SSPDR (8% vs 6%, p = 0.53) between ColoWrap and sham. In sub-group analysis, there were increased odds of adenoma detection with ColoWrap in women (OR: 2.32, 95%CI: 1.21, 4.46), participants > 60 years (OR: 2.95, 95%CI: 1.43, 6.07) and those with a BMI 30–40 (OR: 3.50, 95%CI: 1.00, 12.23). Use of ColoWrap also increased ADR in the left colon (splenic flexure to rectum) (29% vs 22%; p = 0.03) and increased SSPDR in the cecum/ascending colon (6% vs 2%; p = 0.02) compared to sham. CONCLUSION: Use of ColoWrap during colonoscopy did not negatively impact ADR or SSPDR, and there was an apparent improvement in polyp detection in certain colon locations and patient sub-groups. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC9369446/ /pubmed/35966966 http://dx.doi.org/10.17554/j.issn.2224-3992.2018.07.787 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Eluri, Swathi
Runge, Thomas M.
Cirri, Holly
Martin, Christopher F.
Dellon, Evan S.
Crockett, Seth D.
Effect of an External Abdominal Compression Device on Polyp Detection during Colonoscopy
title Effect of an External Abdominal Compression Device on Polyp Detection during Colonoscopy
title_full Effect of an External Abdominal Compression Device on Polyp Detection during Colonoscopy
title_fullStr Effect of an External Abdominal Compression Device on Polyp Detection during Colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Effect of an External Abdominal Compression Device on Polyp Detection during Colonoscopy
title_short Effect of an External Abdominal Compression Device on Polyp Detection during Colonoscopy
title_sort effect of an external abdominal compression device on polyp detection during colonoscopy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966966
http://dx.doi.org/10.17554/j.issn.2224-3992.2018.07.787
work_keys_str_mv AT eluriswathi effectofanexternalabdominalcompressiondeviceonpolypdetectionduringcolonoscopy
AT rungethomasm effectofanexternalabdominalcompressiondeviceonpolypdetectionduringcolonoscopy
AT cirriholly effectofanexternalabdominalcompressiondeviceonpolypdetectionduringcolonoscopy
AT martinchristopherf effectofanexternalabdominalcompressiondeviceonpolypdetectionduringcolonoscopy
AT dellonevans effectofanexternalabdominalcompressiondeviceonpolypdetectionduringcolonoscopy
AT crockettsethd effectofanexternalabdominalcompressiondeviceonpolypdetectionduringcolonoscopy