Cargando…

Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading

The aim of this study was the development of a test regime to determine the wear resistance and predict the clinical performance of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in Class I tooth cavities. Cavities were prepared in excised human teeth and restored using three conventional glas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Messer-Hannemann, Philipp, Samadi, Mariam, Böttcher, Henrik, Duy, Sebastian, Duy, Daniela, Albrecht, Niclas, Schwendicke, Falk, Effenberger, Susanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35955375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15155440
_version_ 1784766467414163456
author Messer-Hannemann, Philipp
Samadi, Mariam
Böttcher, Henrik
Duy, Sebastian
Duy, Daniela
Albrecht, Niclas
Schwendicke, Falk
Effenberger, Susanne
author_facet Messer-Hannemann, Philipp
Samadi, Mariam
Böttcher, Henrik
Duy, Sebastian
Duy, Daniela
Albrecht, Niclas
Schwendicke, Falk
Effenberger, Susanne
author_sort Messer-Hannemann, Philipp
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was the development of a test regime to determine the wear resistance and predict the clinical performance of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in Class I tooth cavities. Cavities were prepared in excised human teeth and restored using three conventional glass ionomer restorative materials: DeltaFil, Fuji IX GP and Ketac Universal. The restored teeth were mechanically and thermally stressed using a chewing simulator with a maximum number of 1,200,000 load cycles. Besides determining the number of cycles achieved, the abrasion volume after termination of the chewing simulation was calculated using µCT images. All teeth restored with DeltaFil reached 1,200,000 cycles without any restoration failure. Only 37.5% of the restorations each with Ketac Universal and Fuji IX GP were able to achieve the maximum cycle number. A significant lower abrasion volume for restorations with DeltaFil compared to Ketac Universal (p = 0.0099) and Fuji IX GP (p = 0.0005) was found. Laboratory chewing simulations are a useful tool to study basic wear mechanisms in a controlled setting with in-vivo related parameters. DeltaFil shows an improved wear resistance compared to other conventional GICs, indicating the high potential of this material for long-lasting Class I restorations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9369466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93694662022-08-12 Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading Messer-Hannemann, Philipp Samadi, Mariam Böttcher, Henrik Duy, Sebastian Duy, Daniela Albrecht, Niclas Schwendicke, Falk Effenberger, Susanne Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was the development of a test regime to determine the wear resistance and predict the clinical performance of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in Class I tooth cavities. Cavities were prepared in excised human teeth and restored using three conventional glass ionomer restorative materials: DeltaFil, Fuji IX GP and Ketac Universal. The restored teeth were mechanically and thermally stressed using a chewing simulator with a maximum number of 1,200,000 load cycles. Besides determining the number of cycles achieved, the abrasion volume after termination of the chewing simulation was calculated using µCT images. All teeth restored with DeltaFil reached 1,200,000 cycles without any restoration failure. Only 37.5% of the restorations each with Ketac Universal and Fuji IX GP were able to achieve the maximum cycle number. A significant lower abrasion volume for restorations with DeltaFil compared to Ketac Universal (p = 0.0099) and Fuji IX GP (p = 0.0005) was found. Laboratory chewing simulations are a useful tool to study basic wear mechanisms in a controlled setting with in-vivo related parameters. DeltaFil shows an improved wear resistance compared to other conventional GICs, indicating the high potential of this material for long-lasting Class I restorations. MDPI 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9369466/ /pubmed/35955375 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15155440 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Messer-Hannemann, Philipp
Samadi, Mariam
Böttcher, Henrik
Duy, Sebastian
Duy, Daniela
Albrecht, Niclas
Schwendicke, Falk
Effenberger, Susanne
Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title_full Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title_short Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title_sort evaluation of a method to determine wear resistance of class i tooth restorations during cyclic loading
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35955375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15155440
work_keys_str_mv AT messerhannemannphilipp evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT samadimariam evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT bottcherhenrik evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT duysebastian evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT duydaniela evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT albrechtniclas evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT schwendickefalk evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT effenbergersusanne evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading