Cargando…
Assessment of the New Acceleromyograph TOF 3D Compared with the Established TOF Watch SX: Bland-Altman Analysis of the Precision and Limits of Agreement between Both Devices—A Randomized Clinical Comparison
The new acceleromyograph TOF 3D was compared with the established TOF Watch SX in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Neuromuscular transmission was assessed by simultaneous recording with both devices. Measurements were performed simultaneously at the left and the right...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154583 |
_version_ | 1784766560960774144 |
---|---|
author | Soltesz, Stefan Thomas, Jan Anapolski, Michael Noé, Guenter Karl |
author_facet | Soltesz, Stefan Thomas, Jan Anapolski, Michael Noé, Guenter Karl |
author_sort | Soltesz, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The new acceleromyograph TOF 3D was compared with the established TOF Watch SX in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Neuromuscular transmission was assessed by simultaneous recording with both devices. Measurements were performed simultaneously at the left and the right M. adductor pollicis (Group A, 25 patients), or the M. corrugator supercilii (Group CS, 25 patients). The repeatability, time course, and limits of agreement (Bland-Altman) were compared. The primary endpoint was the 90% train-of-four recovery time (TOFR 0.9). Other endpoints included onset time of block, maximum T1 depression, time to 25% T1 recovery, the recovery time course of T1 response, and TOF ratio, respectively. In group CS, the repeatability coefficient of the TOF 3D was lower (4.66 (1.6)) than of the TOF Watch SX (6.02 (1.9); p = 0.026). In group A, the onset of the block was faster when measured by the TOF 3D (98.7 (30) s vs. 112.2 (36) s (mean (SD)); p = 0.032). In group A, time to recovery to a TOFR of 90% was measured earlier by the TOF 3D (bias −0.71 min, limits of agreement from −8.94 to +7.51 min). The TOF 3D provides adequate information with high precision and sensitivity. It is suitable even for measurement sites with small muscle contractions such as the M. corrugator supercilii. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9369732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93697322022-08-12 Assessment of the New Acceleromyograph TOF 3D Compared with the Established TOF Watch SX: Bland-Altman Analysis of the Precision and Limits of Agreement between Both Devices—A Randomized Clinical Comparison Soltesz, Stefan Thomas, Jan Anapolski, Michael Noé, Guenter Karl J Clin Med Article The new acceleromyograph TOF 3D was compared with the established TOF Watch SX in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Neuromuscular transmission was assessed by simultaneous recording with both devices. Measurements were performed simultaneously at the left and the right M. adductor pollicis (Group A, 25 patients), or the M. corrugator supercilii (Group CS, 25 patients). The repeatability, time course, and limits of agreement (Bland-Altman) were compared. The primary endpoint was the 90% train-of-four recovery time (TOFR 0.9). Other endpoints included onset time of block, maximum T1 depression, time to 25% T1 recovery, the recovery time course of T1 response, and TOF ratio, respectively. In group CS, the repeatability coefficient of the TOF 3D was lower (4.66 (1.6)) than of the TOF Watch SX (6.02 (1.9); p = 0.026). In group A, the onset of the block was faster when measured by the TOF 3D (98.7 (30) s vs. 112.2 (36) s (mean (SD)); p = 0.032). In group A, time to recovery to a TOFR of 90% was measured earlier by the TOF 3D (bias −0.71 min, limits of agreement from −8.94 to +7.51 min). The TOF 3D provides adequate information with high precision and sensitivity. It is suitable even for measurement sites with small muscle contractions such as the M. corrugator supercilii. MDPI 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9369732/ /pubmed/35956198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154583 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Soltesz, Stefan Thomas, Jan Anapolski, Michael Noé, Guenter Karl Assessment of the New Acceleromyograph TOF 3D Compared with the Established TOF Watch SX: Bland-Altman Analysis of the Precision and Limits of Agreement between Both Devices—A Randomized Clinical Comparison |
title | Assessment of the New Acceleromyograph TOF 3D Compared with the Established TOF Watch SX: Bland-Altman Analysis of the Precision and Limits of Agreement between Both Devices—A Randomized Clinical Comparison |
title_full | Assessment of the New Acceleromyograph TOF 3D Compared with the Established TOF Watch SX: Bland-Altman Analysis of the Precision and Limits of Agreement between Both Devices—A Randomized Clinical Comparison |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the New Acceleromyograph TOF 3D Compared with the Established TOF Watch SX: Bland-Altman Analysis of the Precision and Limits of Agreement between Both Devices—A Randomized Clinical Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the New Acceleromyograph TOF 3D Compared with the Established TOF Watch SX: Bland-Altman Analysis of the Precision and Limits of Agreement between Both Devices—A Randomized Clinical Comparison |
title_short | Assessment of the New Acceleromyograph TOF 3D Compared with the Established TOF Watch SX: Bland-Altman Analysis of the Precision and Limits of Agreement between Both Devices—A Randomized Clinical Comparison |
title_sort | assessment of the new acceleromyograph tof 3d compared with the established tof watch sx: bland-altman analysis of the precision and limits of agreement between both devices—a randomized clinical comparison |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956198 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154583 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT solteszstefan assessmentofthenewacceleromyographtof3dcomparedwiththeestablishedtofwatchsxblandaltmananalysisoftheprecisionandlimitsofagreementbetweenbothdevicesarandomizedclinicalcomparison AT thomasjan assessmentofthenewacceleromyographtof3dcomparedwiththeestablishedtofwatchsxblandaltmananalysisoftheprecisionandlimitsofagreementbetweenbothdevicesarandomizedclinicalcomparison AT anapolskimichael assessmentofthenewacceleromyographtof3dcomparedwiththeestablishedtofwatchsxblandaltmananalysisoftheprecisionandlimitsofagreementbetweenbothdevicesarandomizedclinicalcomparison AT noeguenterkarl assessmentofthenewacceleromyographtof3dcomparedwiththeestablishedtofwatchsxblandaltmananalysisoftheprecisionandlimitsofagreementbetweenbothdevicesarandomizedclinicalcomparison |