Cargando…

Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement

Uterus transplantation is a surgical treatment for women with congenital or acquired uterine factor infertility. While uterus transplantation is a life-enhancing transplant that is commonly categorized as a vascular composite allograft (e.g., face or hand), it is similar to many solid organ transpla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frisch, Emily H., Falcone, Tommaso, Flyckt, Rebecca L., Tzakis, Andreas G., Kodish, Eric, Richards, Elliott G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154516
_version_ 1784766574006108160
author Frisch, Emily H.
Falcone, Tommaso
Flyckt, Rebecca L.
Tzakis, Andreas G.
Kodish, Eric
Richards, Elliott G.
author_facet Frisch, Emily H.
Falcone, Tommaso
Flyckt, Rebecca L.
Tzakis, Andreas G.
Kodish, Eric
Richards, Elliott G.
author_sort Frisch, Emily H.
collection PubMed
description Uterus transplantation is a surgical treatment for women with congenital or acquired uterine factor infertility. While uterus transplantation is a life-enhancing transplant that is commonly categorized as a vascular composite allograft (e.g., face or hand), it is similar to many solid organ transplants (e.g., kidney) in that both living donors (LDs) and deceased donors (DDs) can be utilized for organ procurement. While many endpoints appear to be similar for LD and DD transplants (including graft survival, time to menses, livebirth rates), there are key medical, technical, ethical, and logistical differences between these modalities. Primary considerations in favor of a LD model include thorough screening of donors, enhanced logistics, and greater donor availability. The primary consideration in favor of a DD model is the lack of physical or psychological harm to a living donor. Other important factors, that may not clearly favor one approach over the other, are important to include in discussions of LD vs. DD models. We favor a stepwise approach to uterus transplantation, one in which programs first begin with DD procurement before attempting LD procurement to maximize successful organ recovery and to minimize potential harms to a living donor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9369769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93697692022-08-12 Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement Frisch, Emily H. Falcone, Tommaso Flyckt, Rebecca L. Tzakis, Andreas G. Kodish, Eric Richards, Elliott G. J Clin Med Review Uterus transplantation is a surgical treatment for women with congenital or acquired uterine factor infertility. While uterus transplantation is a life-enhancing transplant that is commonly categorized as a vascular composite allograft (e.g., face or hand), it is similar to many solid organ transplants (e.g., kidney) in that both living donors (LDs) and deceased donors (DDs) can be utilized for organ procurement. While many endpoints appear to be similar for LD and DD transplants (including graft survival, time to menses, livebirth rates), there are key medical, technical, ethical, and logistical differences between these modalities. Primary considerations in favor of a LD model include thorough screening of donors, enhanced logistics, and greater donor availability. The primary consideration in favor of a DD model is the lack of physical or psychological harm to a living donor. Other important factors, that may not clearly favor one approach over the other, are important to include in discussions of LD vs. DD models. We favor a stepwise approach to uterus transplantation, one in which programs first begin with DD procurement before attempting LD procurement to maximize successful organ recovery and to minimize potential harms to a living donor. MDPI 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9369769/ /pubmed/35956131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154516 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Frisch, Emily H.
Falcone, Tommaso
Flyckt, Rebecca L.
Tzakis, Andreas G.
Kodish, Eric
Richards, Elliott G.
Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement
title Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement
title_full Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement
title_fullStr Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement
title_full_unstemmed Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement
title_short Uterus Transplantation: Revisiting the Question of Deceased Donors versus Living Donors for Organ Procurement
title_sort uterus transplantation: revisiting the question of deceased donors versus living donors for organ procurement
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154516
work_keys_str_mv AT frischemilyh uterustransplantationrevisitingthequestionofdeceaseddonorsversuslivingdonorsfororganprocurement
AT falconetommaso uterustransplantationrevisitingthequestionofdeceaseddonorsversuslivingdonorsfororganprocurement
AT flycktrebeccal uterustransplantationrevisitingthequestionofdeceaseddonorsversuslivingdonorsfororganprocurement
AT tzakisandreasg uterustransplantationrevisitingthequestionofdeceaseddonorsversuslivingdonorsfororganprocurement
AT kodisheric uterustransplantationrevisitingthequestionofdeceaseddonorsversuslivingdonorsfororganprocurement
AT richardselliottg uterustransplantationrevisitingthequestionofdeceaseddonorsversuslivingdonorsfororganprocurement