Cargando…

The Effects of Low-frequency Vibration on Aligner Treatment Duration: A Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of an orthodontic tooth movement acceleration device (AcceleDent, OrthoAccel Technologies, Houston, Texas) when used during an aligner treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients who began an aligner treatment (Lineo, Miceri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bilello, Giuseppa, Fazio, Massimo, Currò, Giuseppe, Scardina, Giuseppe A, Pizzo, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966912
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_311_21
_version_ 1784766576960995328
author Bilello, Giuseppa
Fazio, Massimo
Currò, Giuseppe
Scardina, Giuseppe A
Pizzo, Giuseppe
author_facet Bilello, Giuseppa
Fazio, Massimo
Currò, Giuseppe
Scardina, Giuseppe A
Pizzo, Giuseppe
author_sort Bilello, Giuseppa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of an orthodontic tooth movement acceleration device (AcceleDent, OrthoAccel Technologies, Houston, Texas) when used during an aligner treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients who began an aligner treatment (Lineo, Micerium Lab, Avegno, Italy) were allocated to two treatment groups. The first one (Group A), with a 7-day aligner change regimen, used the AcceleDent device for 20 min per day, whereas the second one (Group B) changed the aligners every 14 days and did not use any device. The registered outcomes were the possibility of completing the treatment, the number of aligners needed and treatment duration in the two groups. Moreover, we assessed patients’ perception of pain during the first week of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were allocated to Group A or B depending on the acceptance of AcceleDent use. Patients which used AcceleDent (Group A) completed the treatment using each aligner for fewer days than those belonging to Group B (9.0 ± 1.0 and 15.4 ± 1.2 days, respectively) (P < 0.001). As a secondary outcome, a significant difference was found in pain perception during the first week of treatment between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This controlled clinical trial shows that is possible to apply a 7-day change regimen together with AcceleDent use and successfully complete an aligner treatment with a significant saving of time when compared to a standard 14-days change regimen. Finally, the use of this device allowed reduction in pain perception during the orthodontic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9369779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93697792022-08-12 The Effects of Low-frequency Vibration on Aligner Treatment Duration: A Clinical Trial Bilello, Giuseppa Fazio, Massimo Currò, Giuseppe Scardina, Giuseppe A Pizzo, Giuseppe J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of an orthodontic tooth movement acceleration device (AcceleDent, OrthoAccel Technologies, Houston, Texas) when used during an aligner treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients who began an aligner treatment (Lineo, Micerium Lab, Avegno, Italy) were allocated to two treatment groups. The first one (Group A), with a 7-day aligner change regimen, used the AcceleDent device for 20 min per day, whereas the second one (Group B) changed the aligners every 14 days and did not use any device. The registered outcomes were the possibility of completing the treatment, the number of aligners needed and treatment duration in the two groups. Moreover, we assessed patients’ perception of pain during the first week of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were allocated to Group A or B depending on the acceptance of AcceleDent use. Patients which used AcceleDent (Group A) completed the treatment using each aligner for fewer days than those belonging to Group B (9.0 ± 1.0 and 15.4 ± 1.2 days, respectively) (P < 0.001). As a secondary outcome, a significant difference was found in pain perception during the first week of treatment between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This controlled clinical trial shows that is possible to apply a 7-day change regimen together with AcceleDent use and successfully complete an aligner treatment with a significant saving of time when compared to a standard 14-days change regimen. Finally, the use of this device allowed reduction in pain perception during the orthodontic treatment. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9369779/ /pubmed/35966912 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_311_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bilello, Giuseppa
Fazio, Massimo
Currò, Giuseppe
Scardina, Giuseppe A
Pizzo, Giuseppe
The Effects of Low-frequency Vibration on Aligner Treatment Duration: A Clinical Trial
title The Effects of Low-frequency Vibration on Aligner Treatment Duration: A Clinical Trial
title_full The Effects of Low-frequency Vibration on Aligner Treatment Duration: A Clinical Trial
title_fullStr The Effects of Low-frequency Vibration on Aligner Treatment Duration: A Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Low-frequency Vibration on Aligner Treatment Duration: A Clinical Trial
title_short The Effects of Low-frequency Vibration on Aligner Treatment Duration: A Clinical Trial
title_sort effects of low-frequency vibration on aligner treatment duration: a clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966912
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_311_21
work_keys_str_mv AT bilellogiuseppa theeffectsoflowfrequencyvibrationonalignertreatmentdurationaclinicaltrial
AT faziomassimo theeffectsoflowfrequencyvibrationonalignertreatmentdurationaclinicaltrial
AT currogiuseppe theeffectsoflowfrequencyvibrationonalignertreatmentdurationaclinicaltrial
AT scardinagiuseppea theeffectsoflowfrequencyvibrationonalignertreatmentdurationaclinicaltrial
AT pizzogiuseppe theeffectsoflowfrequencyvibrationonalignertreatmentdurationaclinicaltrial
AT bilellogiuseppa effectsoflowfrequencyvibrationonalignertreatmentdurationaclinicaltrial
AT faziomassimo effectsoflowfrequencyvibrationonalignertreatmentdurationaclinicaltrial
AT currogiuseppe effectsoflowfrequencyvibrationonalignertreatmentdurationaclinicaltrial
AT scardinagiuseppea effectsoflowfrequencyvibrationonalignertreatmentdurationaclinicaltrial
AT pizzogiuseppe effectsoflowfrequencyvibrationonalignertreatmentdurationaclinicaltrial