Cargando…

Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols

Vineyard exposure to wildfire smoke can taint grapes and wine. To understand the impact of this taint, it is imperative that the analytical methods used are accurate and precise. This study compared the variance across nine commercial and research laboratories following quantitative analysis of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Favell, James W., Wilkinson, Kerry L., Zigg, Ieva, Lyons, Sarah M., Ristic, Renata, Puglisi, Carolyn J., Wilkes, Eric, Taylor, Randell, Kelly, Duane, Howell, Greg, McKay, Marianne, Mokwena, Lucky, Plozza, Tim, Zhang, Pei, Bui, AnhDuyen, Porter, Ian, Frederick, Orrin, Karasek, Jasha, Szeto, Colleen, Pan, Bruce S., Tallman, Steve, McClure, Beth Anne, Feng, Hui, Hervé, Eric, Oberholster, Anita, Zandberg, Wesley F., Noestheden, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154892
_version_ 1784766601314172928
author Favell, James W.
Wilkinson, Kerry L.
Zigg, Ieva
Lyons, Sarah M.
Ristic, Renata
Puglisi, Carolyn J.
Wilkes, Eric
Taylor, Randell
Kelly, Duane
Howell, Greg
McKay, Marianne
Mokwena, Lucky
Plozza, Tim
Zhang, Pei
Bui, AnhDuyen
Porter, Ian
Frederick, Orrin
Karasek, Jasha
Szeto, Colleen
Pan, Bruce S.
Tallman, Steve
McClure, Beth Anne
Feng, Hui
Hervé, Eric
Oberholster, Anita
Zandberg, Wesley F.
Noestheden, Matthew
author_facet Favell, James W.
Wilkinson, Kerry L.
Zigg, Ieva
Lyons, Sarah M.
Ristic, Renata
Puglisi, Carolyn J.
Wilkes, Eric
Taylor, Randell
Kelly, Duane
Howell, Greg
McKay, Marianne
Mokwena, Lucky
Plozza, Tim
Zhang, Pei
Bui, AnhDuyen
Porter, Ian
Frederick, Orrin
Karasek, Jasha
Szeto, Colleen
Pan, Bruce S.
Tallman, Steve
McClure, Beth Anne
Feng, Hui
Hervé, Eric
Oberholster, Anita
Zandberg, Wesley F.
Noestheden, Matthew
author_sort Favell, James W.
collection PubMed
description Vineyard exposure to wildfire smoke can taint grapes and wine. To understand the impact of this taint, it is imperative that the analytical methods used are accurate and precise. This study compared the variance across nine commercial and research laboratories following quantitative analysis of the same set of smoke-tainted wines. In parallel, correlations between the interlaboratory consensus values for smoke-taint markers and sensory analyses of the same smoke-tainted wines were evaluated. For free guaiacol, the mean accuracy was 94 ± 11% in model wine, while the free cresols and 4-methylguaiacol showed a negative bias and/or decreased precision relative to guaiacol. Similar trends were observed in smoke-tainted wines, with the cresols and glycosidically bound markers demonstrating high variance. Collectively, the interlaboratory results show that data from a single laboratory can be used quantitatively to understand smoke-taint. Results from different laboratories, however, should not be directly compared due to the high variance between study participants. Correlations between consensus compositional data and sensory evaluations suggest the risk of perceivable smoke-taint can be predicted from free cresol concentrations, overcoming limitations associated with the occurrence of some volatile phenols, guaiacol in particular, as natural constituents of some grape cultivars and of the oak used for barrel maturation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9369848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93698482022-08-12 Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols Favell, James W. Wilkinson, Kerry L. Zigg, Ieva Lyons, Sarah M. Ristic, Renata Puglisi, Carolyn J. Wilkes, Eric Taylor, Randell Kelly, Duane Howell, Greg McKay, Marianne Mokwena, Lucky Plozza, Tim Zhang, Pei Bui, AnhDuyen Porter, Ian Frederick, Orrin Karasek, Jasha Szeto, Colleen Pan, Bruce S. Tallman, Steve McClure, Beth Anne Feng, Hui Hervé, Eric Oberholster, Anita Zandberg, Wesley F. Noestheden, Matthew Molecules Article Vineyard exposure to wildfire smoke can taint grapes and wine. To understand the impact of this taint, it is imperative that the analytical methods used are accurate and precise. This study compared the variance across nine commercial and research laboratories following quantitative analysis of the same set of smoke-tainted wines. In parallel, correlations between the interlaboratory consensus values for smoke-taint markers and sensory analyses of the same smoke-tainted wines were evaluated. For free guaiacol, the mean accuracy was 94 ± 11% in model wine, while the free cresols and 4-methylguaiacol showed a negative bias and/or decreased precision relative to guaiacol. Similar trends were observed in smoke-tainted wines, with the cresols and glycosidically bound markers demonstrating high variance. Collectively, the interlaboratory results show that data from a single laboratory can be used quantitatively to understand smoke-taint. Results from different laboratories, however, should not be directly compared due to the high variance between study participants. Correlations between consensus compositional data and sensory evaluations suggest the risk of perceivable smoke-taint can be predicted from free cresol concentrations, overcoming limitations associated with the occurrence of some volatile phenols, guaiacol in particular, as natural constituents of some grape cultivars and of the oak used for barrel maturation. MDPI 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9369848/ /pubmed/35956842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154892 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Favell, James W.
Wilkinson, Kerry L.
Zigg, Ieva
Lyons, Sarah M.
Ristic, Renata
Puglisi, Carolyn J.
Wilkes, Eric
Taylor, Randell
Kelly, Duane
Howell, Greg
McKay, Marianne
Mokwena, Lucky
Plozza, Tim
Zhang, Pei
Bui, AnhDuyen
Porter, Ian
Frederick, Orrin
Karasek, Jasha
Szeto, Colleen
Pan, Bruce S.
Tallman, Steve
McClure, Beth Anne
Feng, Hui
Hervé, Eric
Oberholster, Anita
Zandberg, Wesley F.
Noestheden, Matthew
Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols
title Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols
title_full Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols
title_fullStr Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols
title_full_unstemmed Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols
title_short Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols
title_sort correlating sensory assessment of smoke-tainted wines with inter-laboratory study consensus values for volatile phenols
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154892
work_keys_str_mv AT favelljamesw correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT wilkinsonkerryl correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT ziggieva correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT lyonssarahm correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT risticrenata correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT puglisicarolynj correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT wilkeseric correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT taylorrandell correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT kellyduane correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT howellgreg correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT mckaymarianne correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT mokwenalucky correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT plozzatim correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT zhangpei correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT buianhduyen correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT porterian correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT frederickorrin correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT karasekjasha correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT szetocolleen correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT panbruces correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT tallmansteve correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT mcclurebethanne correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT fenghui correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT herveeric correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT oberholsteranita correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT zandbergwesleyf correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols
AT noesthedenmatthew correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols