Cargando…
Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols
Vineyard exposure to wildfire smoke can taint grapes and wine. To understand the impact of this taint, it is imperative that the analytical methods used are accurate and precise. This study compared the variance across nine commercial and research laboratories following quantitative analysis of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154892 |
_version_ | 1784766601314172928 |
---|---|
author | Favell, James W. Wilkinson, Kerry L. Zigg, Ieva Lyons, Sarah M. Ristic, Renata Puglisi, Carolyn J. Wilkes, Eric Taylor, Randell Kelly, Duane Howell, Greg McKay, Marianne Mokwena, Lucky Plozza, Tim Zhang, Pei Bui, AnhDuyen Porter, Ian Frederick, Orrin Karasek, Jasha Szeto, Colleen Pan, Bruce S. Tallman, Steve McClure, Beth Anne Feng, Hui Hervé, Eric Oberholster, Anita Zandberg, Wesley F. Noestheden, Matthew |
author_facet | Favell, James W. Wilkinson, Kerry L. Zigg, Ieva Lyons, Sarah M. Ristic, Renata Puglisi, Carolyn J. Wilkes, Eric Taylor, Randell Kelly, Duane Howell, Greg McKay, Marianne Mokwena, Lucky Plozza, Tim Zhang, Pei Bui, AnhDuyen Porter, Ian Frederick, Orrin Karasek, Jasha Szeto, Colleen Pan, Bruce S. Tallman, Steve McClure, Beth Anne Feng, Hui Hervé, Eric Oberholster, Anita Zandberg, Wesley F. Noestheden, Matthew |
author_sort | Favell, James W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vineyard exposure to wildfire smoke can taint grapes and wine. To understand the impact of this taint, it is imperative that the analytical methods used are accurate and precise. This study compared the variance across nine commercial and research laboratories following quantitative analysis of the same set of smoke-tainted wines. In parallel, correlations between the interlaboratory consensus values for smoke-taint markers and sensory analyses of the same smoke-tainted wines were evaluated. For free guaiacol, the mean accuracy was 94 ± 11% in model wine, while the free cresols and 4-methylguaiacol showed a negative bias and/or decreased precision relative to guaiacol. Similar trends were observed in smoke-tainted wines, with the cresols and glycosidically bound markers demonstrating high variance. Collectively, the interlaboratory results show that data from a single laboratory can be used quantitatively to understand smoke-taint. Results from different laboratories, however, should not be directly compared due to the high variance between study participants. Correlations between consensus compositional data and sensory evaluations suggest the risk of perceivable smoke-taint can be predicted from free cresol concentrations, overcoming limitations associated with the occurrence of some volatile phenols, guaiacol in particular, as natural constituents of some grape cultivars and of the oak used for barrel maturation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9369848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93698482022-08-12 Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols Favell, James W. Wilkinson, Kerry L. Zigg, Ieva Lyons, Sarah M. Ristic, Renata Puglisi, Carolyn J. Wilkes, Eric Taylor, Randell Kelly, Duane Howell, Greg McKay, Marianne Mokwena, Lucky Plozza, Tim Zhang, Pei Bui, AnhDuyen Porter, Ian Frederick, Orrin Karasek, Jasha Szeto, Colleen Pan, Bruce S. Tallman, Steve McClure, Beth Anne Feng, Hui Hervé, Eric Oberholster, Anita Zandberg, Wesley F. Noestheden, Matthew Molecules Article Vineyard exposure to wildfire smoke can taint grapes and wine. To understand the impact of this taint, it is imperative that the analytical methods used are accurate and precise. This study compared the variance across nine commercial and research laboratories following quantitative analysis of the same set of smoke-tainted wines. In parallel, correlations between the interlaboratory consensus values for smoke-taint markers and sensory analyses of the same smoke-tainted wines were evaluated. For free guaiacol, the mean accuracy was 94 ± 11% in model wine, while the free cresols and 4-methylguaiacol showed a negative bias and/or decreased precision relative to guaiacol. Similar trends were observed in smoke-tainted wines, with the cresols and glycosidically bound markers demonstrating high variance. Collectively, the interlaboratory results show that data from a single laboratory can be used quantitatively to understand smoke-taint. Results from different laboratories, however, should not be directly compared due to the high variance between study participants. Correlations between consensus compositional data and sensory evaluations suggest the risk of perceivable smoke-taint can be predicted from free cresol concentrations, overcoming limitations associated with the occurrence of some volatile phenols, guaiacol in particular, as natural constituents of some grape cultivars and of the oak used for barrel maturation. MDPI 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9369848/ /pubmed/35956842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154892 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Favell, James W. Wilkinson, Kerry L. Zigg, Ieva Lyons, Sarah M. Ristic, Renata Puglisi, Carolyn J. Wilkes, Eric Taylor, Randell Kelly, Duane Howell, Greg McKay, Marianne Mokwena, Lucky Plozza, Tim Zhang, Pei Bui, AnhDuyen Porter, Ian Frederick, Orrin Karasek, Jasha Szeto, Colleen Pan, Bruce S. Tallman, Steve McClure, Beth Anne Feng, Hui Hervé, Eric Oberholster, Anita Zandberg, Wesley F. Noestheden, Matthew Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols |
title | Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols |
title_full | Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols |
title_fullStr | Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols |
title_short | Correlating Sensory Assessment of Smoke-Tainted Wines with Inter-Laboratory Study Consensus Values for Volatile Phenols |
title_sort | correlating sensory assessment of smoke-tainted wines with inter-laboratory study consensus values for volatile phenols |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT favelljamesw correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT wilkinsonkerryl correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT ziggieva correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT lyonssarahm correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT risticrenata correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT puglisicarolynj correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT wilkeseric correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT taylorrandell correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT kellyduane correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT howellgreg correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT mckaymarianne correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT mokwenalucky correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT plozzatim correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT zhangpei correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT buianhduyen correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT porterian correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT frederickorrin correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT karasekjasha correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT szetocolleen correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT panbruces correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT tallmansteve correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT mcclurebethanne correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT fenghui correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT herveeric correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT oberholsteranita correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT zandbergwesleyf correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols AT noesthedenmatthew correlatingsensoryassessmentofsmoketaintedwineswithinterlaboratorystudyconsensusvaluesforvolatilephenols |