Cargando…
The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study
The close monitoring of blood pressure during a caesarean section performed under central neuraxial anaesthesia should be the standard of safe anaesthesia. As classical oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measuring have intrinsic disadvantages, we investigated a novel, non-invasive technique f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154498 |
_version_ | 1784766626315370496 |
---|---|
author | Helmer, Philipp Helf, Daniel Sammeth, Michael Winkler, Bernd Hottenrott, Sebastian Meybohm, Patrick Kranke, Peter |
author_facet | Helmer, Philipp Helf, Daniel Sammeth, Michael Winkler, Bernd Hottenrott, Sebastian Meybohm, Patrick Kranke, Peter |
author_sort | Helmer, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | The close monitoring of blood pressure during a caesarean section performed under central neuraxial anaesthesia should be the standard of safe anaesthesia. As classical oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measuring have intrinsic disadvantages, we investigated a novel, non-invasive technique for continuous blood pressure measuring. Methods: In this monocentric, retrospective data analysis, the reliability of continuous non-invasive blood pressure measuring using ClearSight(®) (Edwards Lifesciences Corporation) is validated in 31 women undergoing central neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section. In addition, patients and professionals evaluated ClearSight(®) through questioning. Results: 139 measurements from 11 patients were included in the final analysis. Employing Bland–Altman analyses, we identified a bias of −10.8 mmHg for systolic, of −0.45 mmHg for diastolic and of +0.68 mmHg for mean arterial blood pressure measurements. Pooling all paired measurements resulted in a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7 for systolic, of 0.67 for diastolic and of 0.75 for mean arterial blood pressure. Compensating the interindividual differences in linear regressions of the paired measurements provided improved correlation coefficients of 0.73 for systolic, of 0.9 for diastolic and of 0.89 for mean arterial blood pressure measurements. Discussion: Diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure are within an acceptable range of deviation from the reference method, according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) in the patient collective under study. Both patients and professionals prefer ClearSight(®) to oscillometric blood pressure measurement in regard of comfort and handling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9369920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93699202022-08-12 The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study Helmer, Philipp Helf, Daniel Sammeth, Michael Winkler, Bernd Hottenrott, Sebastian Meybohm, Patrick Kranke, Peter J Clin Med Article The close monitoring of blood pressure during a caesarean section performed under central neuraxial anaesthesia should be the standard of safe anaesthesia. As classical oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measuring have intrinsic disadvantages, we investigated a novel, non-invasive technique for continuous blood pressure measuring. Methods: In this monocentric, retrospective data analysis, the reliability of continuous non-invasive blood pressure measuring using ClearSight(®) (Edwards Lifesciences Corporation) is validated in 31 women undergoing central neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section. In addition, patients and professionals evaluated ClearSight(®) through questioning. Results: 139 measurements from 11 patients were included in the final analysis. Employing Bland–Altman analyses, we identified a bias of −10.8 mmHg for systolic, of −0.45 mmHg for diastolic and of +0.68 mmHg for mean arterial blood pressure measurements. Pooling all paired measurements resulted in a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7 for systolic, of 0.67 for diastolic and of 0.75 for mean arterial blood pressure. Compensating the interindividual differences in linear regressions of the paired measurements provided improved correlation coefficients of 0.73 for systolic, of 0.9 for diastolic and of 0.89 for mean arterial blood pressure measurements. Discussion: Diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure are within an acceptable range of deviation from the reference method, according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) in the patient collective under study. Both patients and professionals prefer ClearSight(®) to oscillometric blood pressure measurement in regard of comfort and handling. MDPI 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9369920/ /pubmed/35956113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154498 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Helmer, Philipp Helf, Daniel Sammeth, Michael Winkler, Bernd Hottenrott, Sebastian Meybohm, Patrick Kranke, Peter The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study |
title | The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study |
title_full | The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study |
title_fullStr | The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study |
title_short | The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study |
title_sort | use of non-invasive continuous blood pressure measuring (clearsight(®)) during central neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section—a retrospective validation study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154498 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT helmerphilipp theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT helfdaniel theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT sammethmichael theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT winklerbernd theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT hottenrottsebastian theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT meybohmpatrick theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT krankepeter theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT helmerphilipp useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT helfdaniel useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT sammethmichael useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT winklerbernd useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT hottenrottsebastian useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT meybohmpatrick useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy AT krankepeter useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy |