Cargando…

The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study

The close monitoring of blood pressure during a caesarean section performed under central neuraxial anaesthesia should be the standard of safe anaesthesia. As classical oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measuring have intrinsic disadvantages, we investigated a novel, non-invasive technique f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helmer, Philipp, Helf, Daniel, Sammeth, Michael, Winkler, Bernd, Hottenrott, Sebastian, Meybohm, Patrick, Kranke, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956113
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154498
_version_ 1784766626315370496
author Helmer, Philipp
Helf, Daniel
Sammeth, Michael
Winkler, Bernd
Hottenrott, Sebastian
Meybohm, Patrick
Kranke, Peter
author_facet Helmer, Philipp
Helf, Daniel
Sammeth, Michael
Winkler, Bernd
Hottenrott, Sebastian
Meybohm, Patrick
Kranke, Peter
author_sort Helmer, Philipp
collection PubMed
description The close monitoring of blood pressure during a caesarean section performed under central neuraxial anaesthesia should be the standard of safe anaesthesia. As classical oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measuring have intrinsic disadvantages, we investigated a novel, non-invasive technique for continuous blood pressure measuring. Methods: In this monocentric, retrospective data analysis, the reliability of continuous non-invasive blood pressure measuring using ClearSight(®) (Edwards Lifesciences Corporation) is validated in 31 women undergoing central neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section. In addition, patients and professionals evaluated ClearSight(®) through questioning. Results: 139 measurements from 11 patients were included in the final analysis. Employing Bland–Altman analyses, we identified a bias of −10.8 mmHg for systolic, of −0.45 mmHg for diastolic and of +0.68 mmHg for mean arterial blood pressure measurements. Pooling all paired measurements resulted in a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7 for systolic, of 0.67 for diastolic and of 0.75 for mean arterial blood pressure. Compensating the interindividual differences in linear regressions of the paired measurements provided improved correlation coefficients of 0.73 for systolic, of 0.9 for diastolic and of 0.89 for mean arterial blood pressure measurements. Discussion: Diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure are within an acceptable range of deviation from the reference method, according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) in the patient collective under study. Both patients and professionals prefer ClearSight(®) to oscillometric blood pressure measurement in regard of comfort and handling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9369920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93699202022-08-12 The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study Helmer, Philipp Helf, Daniel Sammeth, Michael Winkler, Bernd Hottenrott, Sebastian Meybohm, Patrick Kranke, Peter J Clin Med Article The close monitoring of blood pressure during a caesarean section performed under central neuraxial anaesthesia should be the standard of safe anaesthesia. As classical oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measuring have intrinsic disadvantages, we investigated a novel, non-invasive technique for continuous blood pressure measuring. Methods: In this monocentric, retrospective data analysis, the reliability of continuous non-invasive blood pressure measuring using ClearSight(®) (Edwards Lifesciences Corporation) is validated in 31 women undergoing central neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section. In addition, patients and professionals evaluated ClearSight(®) through questioning. Results: 139 measurements from 11 patients were included in the final analysis. Employing Bland–Altman analyses, we identified a bias of −10.8 mmHg for systolic, of −0.45 mmHg for diastolic and of +0.68 mmHg for mean arterial blood pressure measurements. Pooling all paired measurements resulted in a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7 for systolic, of 0.67 for diastolic and of 0.75 for mean arterial blood pressure. Compensating the interindividual differences in linear regressions of the paired measurements provided improved correlation coefficients of 0.73 for systolic, of 0.9 for diastolic and of 0.89 for mean arterial blood pressure measurements. Discussion: Diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure are within an acceptable range of deviation from the reference method, according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) in the patient collective under study. Both patients and professionals prefer ClearSight(®) to oscillometric blood pressure measurement in regard of comfort and handling. MDPI 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9369920/ /pubmed/35956113 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154498 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Helmer, Philipp
Helf, Daniel
Sammeth, Michael
Winkler, Bernd
Hottenrott, Sebastian
Meybohm, Patrick
Kranke, Peter
The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study
title The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study
title_full The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study
title_fullStr The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study
title_short The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight(®)) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study
title_sort use of non-invasive continuous blood pressure measuring (clearsight(®)) during central neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section—a retrospective validation study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9369920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35956113
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154498
work_keys_str_mv AT helmerphilipp theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT helfdaniel theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT sammethmichael theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT winklerbernd theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT hottenrottsebastian theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT meybohmpatrick theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT krankepeter theuseofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT helmerphilipp useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT helfdaniel useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT sammethmichael useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT winklerbernd useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT hottenrottsebastian useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT meybohmpatrick useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy
AT krankepeter useofnoninvasivecontinuousbloodpressuremeasuringclearsightduringcentralneuraxialanaesthesiaforcaesareansectionaretrospectivevalidationstudy