Cargando…

Three-Dimensional Lower-Limb Kinematics from Accelerometers and Gyroscopes with Simple and Minimal Functional Calibration Tasks: Validation on Asymptomatic Participants

The use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) to compute gait outputs, such as the 3D lower-limb kinematics is of huge potential, but no consensus on the procedures and algorithms exists. This study aimed at evaluating the validity of a 7-IMUs system against the optoelectronic system. Ten asymptomati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carcreff, Lena, Payen, Gabriel, Grouvel, Gautier, Massé, Fabien, Armand, Stéphane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9370908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155657
_version_ 1784766961344839680
author Carcreff, Lena
Payen, Gabriel
Grouvel, Gautier
Massé, Fabien
Armand, Stéphane
author_facet Carcreff, Lena
Payen, Gabriel
Grouvel, Gautier
Massé, Fabien
Armand, Stéphane
author_sort Carcreff, Lena
collection PubMed
description The use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) to compute gait outputs, such as the 3D lower-limb kinematics is of huge potential, but no consensus on the procedures and algorithms exists. This study aimed at evaluating the validity of a 7-IMUs system against the optoelectronic system. Ten asymptomatic subjects were included. They wore IMUs on their feet, shanks, thighs and pelvis. The IMUs were embedded in clusters with reflective markers. Reference kinematics was computed from anatomical markers. Gait kinematics was obtained from accelerometer and gyroscope data after sensor orientation estimation and sensor-to-segment (S2S) calibration steps. The S2S calibration steps were also applied to the cluster data. IMU-based and cluster-based kinematics were compared to the reference through root mean square errors (RMSEs), centered RMSEs (after mean removal), correlation coefficients (CCs) and differences in amplitude. The mean RMSE and centered RMSE were, respectively, 7.5° and 4.0° for IMU-kinematics, and 7.9° and 3.8° for cluster-kinematics. Very good CCs were found in the sagittal plane for both IMUs and cluster-based kinematics at the hip, knee and ankle levels (CCs > 0.85). The overall mean amplitude difference was about 7°. These results reflected good accordance in our system with the reference, especially in the sagittal plane, but the presence of offsets requires caution for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9370908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93709082022-08-12 Three-Dimensional Lower-Limb Kinematics from Accelerometers and Gyroscopes with Simple and Minimal Functional Calibration Tasks: Validation on Asymptomatic Participants Carcreff, Lena Payen, Gabriel Grouvel, Gautier Massé, Fabien Armand, Stéphane Sensors (Basel) Article The use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) to compute gait outputs, such as the 3D lower-limb kinematics is of huge potential, but no consensus on the procedures and algorithms exists. This study aimed at evaluating the validity of a 7-IMUs system against the optoelectronic system. Ten asymptomatic subjects were included. They wore IMUs on their feet, shanks, thighs and pelvis. The IMUs were embedded in clusters with reflective markers. Reference kinematics was computed from anatomical markers. Gait kinematics was obtained from accelerometer and gyroscope data after sensor orientation estimation and sensor-to-segment (S2S) calibration steps. The S2S calibration steps were also applied to the cluster data. IMU-based and cluster-based kinematics were compared to the reference through root mean square errors (RMSEs), centered RMSEs (after mean removal), correlation coefficients (CCs) and differences in amplitude. The mean RMSE and centered RMSE were, respectively, 7.5° and 4.0° for IMU-kinematics, and 7.9° and 3.8° for cluster-kinematics. Very good CCs were found in the sagittal plane for both IMUs and cluster-based kinematics at the hip, knee and ankle levels (CCs > 0.85). The overall mean amplitude difference was about 7°. These results reflected good accordance in our system with the reference, especially in the sagittal plane, but the presence of offsets requires caution for clinical use. MDPI 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9370908/ /pubmed/35957218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155657 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Carcreff, Lena
Payen, Gabriel
Grouvel, Gautier
Massé, Fabien
Armand, Stéphane
Three-Dimensional Lower-Limb Kinematics from Accelerometers and Gyroscopes with Simple and Minimal Functional Calibration Tasks: Validation on Asymptomatic Participants
title Three-Dimensional Lower-Limb Kinematics from Accelerometers and Gyroscopes with Simple and Minimal Functional Calibration Tasks: Validation on Asymptomatic Participants
title_full Three-Dimensional Lower-Limb Kinematics from Accelerometers and Gyroscopes with Simple and Minimal Functional Calibration Tasks: Validation on Asymptomatic Participants
title_fullStr Three-Dimensional Lower-Limb Kinematics from Accelerometers and Gyroscopes with Simple and Minimal Functional Calibration Tasks: Validation on Asymptomatic Participants
title_full_unstemmed Three-Dimensional Lower-Limb Kinematics from Accelerometers and Gyroscopes with Simple and Minimal Functional Calibration Tasks: Validation on Asymptomatic Participants
title_short Three-Dimensional Lower-Limb Kinematics from Accelerometers and Gyroscopes with Simple and Minimal Functional Calibration Tasks: Validation on Asymptomatic Participants
title_sort three-dimensional lower-limb kinematics from accelerometers and gyroscopes with simple and minimal functional calibration tasks: validation on asymptomatic participants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9370908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155657
work_keys_str_mv AT carcrefflena threedimensionallowerlimbkinematicsfromaccelerometersandgyroscopeswithsimpleandminimalfunctionalcalibrationtasksvalidationonasymptomaticparticipants
AT payengabriel threedimensionallowerlimbkinematicsfromaccelerometersandgyroscopeswithsimpleandminimalfunctionalcalibrationtasksvalidationonasymptomaticparticipants
AT grouvelgautier threedimensionallowerlimbkinematicsfromaccelerometersandgyroscopeswithsimpleandminimalfunctionalcalibrationtasksvalidationonasymptomaticparticipants
AT massefabien threedimensionallowerlimbkinematicsfromaccelerometersandgyroscopeswithsimpleandminimalfunctionalcalibrationtasksvalidationonasymptomaticparticipants
AT armandstephane threedimensionallowerlimbkinematicsfromaccelerometersandgyroscopeswithsimpleandminimalfunctionalcalibrationtasksvalidationonasymptomaticparticipants