Cargando…

A Method to Evaluate Spectral Analysis by Spectroscopy

Visible and near infrared spectroscopy has been widely used to develop a method for rapidly determining organic carbon in soils or sediments (SOC). Most of these studies concentrated on how to establish a good spectral model but ignored how to evaluate the method, such as the use of detection range...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yan, Fan, Pingping, Qiu, Huimin, Li, Xueying, Hou, Guangli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155638
_version_ 1784767006137909248
author Liu, Yan
Fan, Pingping
Qiu, Huimin
Li, Xueying
Hou, Guangli
author_facet Liu, Yan
Fan, Pingping
Qiu, Huimin
Li, Xueying
Hou, Guangli
author_sort Liu, Yan
collection PubMed
description Visible and near infrared spectroscopy has been widely used to develop a method for rapidly determining organic carbon in soils or sediments (SOC). Most of these studies concentrated on how to establish a good spectral model but ignored how to evaluate the method, such as the use of detection range (max and min), resolution and error for SOC spectral analysis. Here, we proposed a method to evaluate the spectral analysis of SOC. Using 96 sediments sampled in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea, China, we established three spectral models of SOC after collecting their spectral reflectance by Agilent Cary 5000, ASD FieldSpec 4 and Ocean Optics QEPro, respectively. For both the calibration set and validation set in each spectrometer, the predicted SOC concentrations followed a distribution curve (function), in which the x-axis was the SOC concentrations. Using these curves, we developed these four technical parameters. The detection ranges were the SOC concentrations where the curve was near to or crossing with the lateral axis, while the detection resolution was the average difference between the two neighboring SOC concentrations. The detection errors were the differences between the predicted SOC and the measured SOC. Results showed that these technical parameters were better in the bench-top spectrometer (Cary 5000) than those in the portable spectrometers when analyzing the same samples. For the portable spectrometers, QEPro had a broader detection range and more consistent detection error than FieldSpec 4, suggesting that the low-cost QEPro performed as well as the high-cost FieldSpec 4. This study provides a good example for evaluating spectral analysis by spectroscopy, which can support the development of the spectral method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93710282022-08-12 A Method to Evaluate Spectral Analysis by Spectroscopy Liu, Yan Fan, Pingping Qiu, Huimin Li, Xueying Hou, Guangli Sensors (Basel) Article Visible and near infrared spectroscopy has been widely used to develop a method for rapidly determining organic carbon in soils or sediments (SOC). Most of these studies concentrated on how to establish a good spectral model but ignored how to evaluate the method, such as the use of detection range (max and min), resolution and error for SOC spectral analysis. Here, we proposed a method to evaluate the spectral analysis of SOC. Using 96 sediments sampled in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea, China, we established three spectral models of SOC after collecting their spectral reflectance by Agilent Cary 5000, ASD FieldSpec 4 and Ocean Optics QEPro, respectively. For both the calibration set and validation set in each spectrometer, the predicted SOC concentrations followed a distribution curve (function), in which the x-axis was the SOC concentrations. Using these curves, we developed these four technical parameters. The detection ranges were the SOC concentrations where the curve was near to or crossing with the lateral axis, while the detection resolution was the average difference between the two neighboring SOC concentrations. The detection errors were the differences between the predicted SOC and the measured SOC. Results showed that these technical parameters were better in the bench-top spectrometer (Cary 5000) than those in the portable spectrometers when analyzing the same samples. For the portable spectrometers, QEPro had a broader detection range and more consistent detection error than FieldSpec 4, suggesting that the low-cost QEPro performed as well as the high-cost FieldSpec 4. This study provides a good example for evaluating spectral analysis by spectroscopy, which can support the development of the spectral method. MDPI 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9371028/ /pubmed/35957195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155638 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Yan
Fan, Pingping
Qiu, Huimin
Li, Xueying
Hou, Guangli
A Method to Evaluate Spectral Analysis by Spectroscopy
title A Method to Evaluate Spectral Analysis by Spectroscopy
title_full A Method to Evaluate Spectral Analysis by Spectroscopy
title_fullStr A Method to Evaluate Spectral Analysis by Spectroscopy
title_full_unstemmed A Method to Evaluate Spectral Analysis by Spectroscopy
title_short A Method to Evaluate Spectral Analysis by Spectroscopy
title_sort method to evaluate spectral analysis by spectroscopy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155638
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyan amethodtoevaluatespectralanalysisbyspectroscopy
AT fanpingping amethodtoevaluatespectralanalysisbyspectroscopy
AT qiuhuimin amethodtoevaluatespectralanalysisbyspectroscopy
AT lixueying amethodtoevaluatespectralanalysisbyspectroscopy
AT houguangli amethodtoevaluatespectralanalysisbyspectroscopy
AT liuyan methodtoevaluatespectralanalysisbyspectroscopy
AT fanpingping methodtoevaluatespectralanalysisbyspectroscopy
AT qiuhuimin methodtoevaluatespectralanalysisbyspectroscopy
AT lixueying methodtoevaluatespectralanalysisbyspectroscopy
AT houguangli methodtoevaluatespectralanalysisbyspectroscopy