Cargando…
Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
Background: Intelligent powered wheelchairs remain a popular research topic that can improve users’ quality of life. Although our multidisciplinary research team has put a lot of effort into adding features based on end-users needs and impairments since 2006, there are still open issues regarding th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155627 |
_version_ | 1784767019510398976 |
---|---|
author | Panchea, Adina M. Todam Nguepnang, Nathalie Kairy, Dahlia Ferland, François |
author_facet | Panchea, Adina M. Todam Nguepnang, Nathalie Kairy, Dahlia Ferland, François |
author_sort | Panchea, Adina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Intelligent powered wheelchairs remain a popular research topic that can improve users’ quality of life. Although our multidisciplinary research team has put a lot of effort into adding features based on end-users needs and impairments since 2006, there are still open issues regarding the usability and functionalities of an intelligent powered wheelchair (IPW). Methods: For this reason, this research presents an experience with our IPW followed by a study in two parts: a quantitative one based on the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire and a qualitative one through open questions regarding IPW functionalities with novice users, e.g., IPW non-users. These users never used an IPW before, but are users and aware of the impacts of the technology used in our IPW, being undergraduate to postdoctoral students and staff (faculty, lecturers, research engineers) at the Faculty of Engineering of Université de Sherbrooke. Results: The qualitative analyses identified different behaviours among the novice users. The quantitative analysis via SUS questionnaire done with novice users reports an “okay” rating (equivalent with a C grade or 68 SUS Score) for our IPW’s usability. Moreover, advantages and disadvantages opinions were gathered on the IPW as well as comments which can be used to improve the system. Conclusions: The results reported in these studies show that the system, e.g., IPW, was judged to be sufficiently usable and robust by novice users, with and without experience with the software used in developing the IPW. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9371067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93710672022-08-12 Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies Panchea, Adina M. Todam Nguepnang, Nathalie Kairy, Dahlia Ferland, François Sensors (Basel) Article Background: Intelligent powered wheelchairs remain a popular research topic that can improve users’ quality of life. Although our multidisciplinary research team has put a lot of effort into adding features based on end-users needs and impairments since 2006, there are still open issues regarding the usability and functionalities of an intelligent powered wheelchair (IPW). Methods: For this reason, this research presents an experience with our IPW followed by a study in two parts: a quantitative one based on the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire and a qualitative one through open questions regarding IPW functionalities with novice users, e.g., IPW non-users. These users never used an IPW before, but are users and aware of the impacts of the technology used in our IPW, being undergraduate to postdoctoral students and staff (faculty, lecturers, research engineers) at the Faculty of Engineering of Université de Sherbrooke. Results: The qualitative analyses identified different behaviours among the novice users. The quantitative analysis via SUS questionnaire done with novice users reports an “okay” rating (equivalent with a C grade or 68 SUS Score) for our IPW’s usability. Moreover, advantages and disadvantages opinions were gathered on the IPW as well as comments which can be used to improve the system. Conclusions: The results reported in these studies show that the system, e.g., IPW, was judged to be sufficiently usable and robust by novice users, with and without experience with the software used in developing the IPW. MDPI 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9371067/ /pubmed/35957184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155627 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Panchea, Adina M. Todam Nguepnang, Nathalie Kairy, Dahlia Ferland, François Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title | Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title_full | Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title_fullStr | Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title_short | Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title_sort | usability evaluation of the smartwheeler through qualitative and quantitative studies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pancheaadinam usabilityevaluationofthesmartwheelerthroughqualitativeandquantitativestudies AT todamnguepnangnathalie usabilityevaluationofthesmartwheelerthroughqualitativeandquantitativestudies AT kairydahlia usabilityevaluationofthesmartwheelerthroughqualitativeandquantitativestudies AT ferlandfrancois usabilityevaluationofthesmartwheelerthroughqualitativeandquantitativestudies |