Cargando…

Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies

Background: Intelligent powered wheelchairs remain a popular research topic that can improve users’ quality of life. Although our multidisciplinary research team has put a lot of effort into adding features based on end-users needs and impairments since 2006, there are still open issues regarding th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panchea, Adina M., Todam Nguepnang, Nathalie, Kairy, Dahlia, Ferland, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155627
_version_ 1784767019510398976
author Panchea, Adina M.
Todam Nguepnang, Nathalie
Kairy, Dahlia
Ferland, François
author_facet Panchea, Adina M.
Todam Nguepnang, Nathalie
Kairy, Dahlia
Ferland, François
author_sort Panchea, Adina M.
collection PubMed
description Background: Intelligent powered wheelchairs remain a popular research topic that can improve users’ quality of life. Although our multidisciplinary research team has put a lot of effort into adding features based on end-users needs and impairments since 2006, there are still open issues regarding the usability and functionalities of an intelligent powered wheelchair (IPW). Methods: For this reason, this research presents an experience with our IPW followed by a study in two parts: a quantitative one based on the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire and a qualitative one through open questions regarding IPW functionalities with novice users, e.g., IPW non-users. These users never used an IPW before, but are users and aware of the impacts of the technology used in our IPW, being undergraduate to postdoctoral students and staff (faculty, lecturers, research engineers) at the Faculty of Engineering of Université de Sherbrooke. Results: The qualitative analyses identified different behaviours among the novice users. The quantitative analysis via SUS questionnaire done with novice users reports an “okay” rating (equivalent with a C grade or 68 SUS Score) for our IPW’s usability. Moreover, advantages and disadvantages opinions were gathered on the IPW as well as comments which can be used to improve the system. Conclusions: The results reported in these studies show that the system, e.g., IPW, was judged to be sufficiently usable and robust by novice users, with and without experience with the software used in developing the IPW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93710672022-08-12 Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies Panchea, Adina M. Todam Nguepnang, Nathalie Kairy, Dahlia Ferland, François Sensors (Basel) Article Background: Intelligent powered wheelchairs remain a popular research topic that can improve users’ quality of life. Although our multidisciplinary research team has put a lot of effort into adding features based on end-users needs and impairments since 2006, there are still open issues regarding the usability and functionalities of an intelligent powered wheelchair (IPW). Methods: For this reason, this research presents an experience with our IPW followed by a study in two parts: a quantitative one based on the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire and a qualitative one through open questions regarding IPW functionalities with novice users, e.g., IPW non-users. These users never used an IPW before, but are users and aware of the impacts of the technology used in our IPW, being undergraduate to postdoctoral students and staff (faculty, lecturers, research engineers) at the Faculty of Engineering of Université de Sherbrooke. Results: The qualitative analyses identified different behaviours among the novice users. The quantitative analysis via SUS questionnaire done with novice users reports an “okay” rating (equivalent with a C grade or 68 SUS Score) for our IPW’s usability. Moreover, advantages and disadvantages opinions were gathered on the IPW as well as comments which can be used to improve the system. Conclusions: The results reported in these studies show that the system, e.g., IPW, was judged to be sufficiently usable and robust by novice users, with and without experience with the software used in developing the IPW. MDPI 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9371067/ /pubmed/35957184 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155627 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Panchea, Adina M.
Todam Nguepnang, Nathalie
Kairy, Dahlia
Ferland, François
Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
title Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
title_full Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
title_fullStr Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
title_full_unstemmed Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
title_short Usability Evaluation of the SmartWheeler through Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
title_sort usability evaluation of the smartwheeler through qualitative and quantitative studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957184
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155627
work_keys_str_mv AT pancheaadinam usabilityevaluationofthesmartwheelerthroughqualitativeandquantitativestudies
AT todamnguepnangnathalie usabilityevaluationofthesmartwheelerthroughqualitativeandquantitativestudies
AT kairydahlia usabilityevaluationofthesmartwheelerthroughqualitativeandquantitativestudies
AT ferlandfrancois usabilityevaluationofthesmartwheelerthroughqualitativeandquantitativestudies