Cargando…
Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems
Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is an advanced measurement method for providing information on impedance changes at several frequencies by injecting a low current into a device under test and analyzing the response voltage. Several methods have been elaborated for BIS measurement, calculating impeda...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155801 |
_version_ | 1784767026115379200 |
---|---|
author | Ben Atitallah, Bilel Kallel, Ahmed Yahia Bouchaala, Dhouha Derbel, Nabil Kanoun, Olfa |
author_facet | Ben Atitallah, Bilel Kallel, Ahmed Yahia Bouchaala, Dhouha Derbel, Nabil Kanoun, Olfa |
author_sort | Ben Atitallah, Bilel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is an advanced measurement method for providing information on impedance changes at several frequencies by injecting a low current into a device under test and analyzing the response voltage. Several methods have been elaborated for BIS measurement, calculating impedance with a gain phase detector (GPD), IQ demodulation, and fast Fourier transform (FFT). Although the measurement method has a big influence on the measurement system performance, a systematical comparative study has not been performed yet. In this paper, we compare them based on simulations and experimental studies. To maintain similar conditions in the implementation of all methods, we use the same signal generator followed by a voltage-controlled current source (VCCS) as a signal generator. For performance analysis, three DUTs have been designed to imitate the typical behavior of biological tissues. A laboratory impedance analyzer is used as a reference. The comparison addresses magnitude measurement accuracy, phase measurement accuracy, signal processing, hardware complexity, and power consumption. The result shows that the FFT-based system excels with high accuracy for amplitude and phase measurement while providing the lowest hardware complexity, and power consumption, but it needs a much higher software complexity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9371087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93710872022-08-12 Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems Ben Atitallah, Bilel Kallel, Ahmed Yahia Bouchaala, Dhouha Derbel, Nabil Kanoun, Olfa Sensors (Basel) Article Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is an advanced measurement method for providing information on impedance changes at several frequencies by injecting a low current into a device under test and analyzing the response voltage. Several methods have been elaborated for BIS measurement, calculating impedance with a gain phase detector (GPD), IQ demodulation, and fast Fourier transform (FFT). Although the measurement method has a big influence on the measurement system performance, a systematical comparative study has not been performed yet. In this paper, we compare them based on simulations and experimental studies. To maintain similar conditions in the implementation of all methods, we use the same signal generator followed by a voltage-controlled current source (VCCS) as a signal generator. For performance analysis, three DUTs have been designed to imitate the typical behavior of biological tissues. A laboratory impedance analyzer is used as a reference. The comparison addresses magnitude measurement accuracy, phase measurement accuracy, signal processing, hardware complexity, and power consumption. The result shows that the FFT-based system excels with high accuracy for amplitude and phase measurement while providing the lowest hardware complexity, and power consumption, but it needs a much higher software complexity. MDPI 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9371087/ /pubmed/35957369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155801 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ben Atitallah, Bilel Kallel, Ahmed Yahia Bouchaala, Dhouha Derbel, Nabil Kanoun, Olfa Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems |
title | Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems |
title_full | Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems |
title_short | Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems |
title_sort | comparative study of measurement methods for embedded bioimpedance spectroscopy systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benatitallahbilel comparativestudyofmeasurementmethodsforembeddedbioimpedancespectroscopysystems AT kallelahmedyahia comparativestudyofmeasurementmethodsforembeddedbioimpedancespectroscopysystems AT bouchaaladhouha comparativestudyofmeasurementmethodsforembeddedbioimpedancespectroscopysystems AT derbelnabil comparativestudyofmeasurementmethodsforembeddedbioimpedancespectroscopysystems AT kanounolfa comparativestudyofmeasurementmethodsforembeddedbioimpedancespectroscopysystems |