Cargando…

Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems

Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is an advanced measurement method for providing information on impedance changes at several frequencies by injecting a low current into a device under test and analyzing the response voltage. Several methods have been elaborated for BIS measurement, calculating impeda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ben Atitallah, Bilel, Kallel, Ahmed Yahia, Bouchaala, Dhouha, Derbel, Nabil, Kanoun, Olfa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155801
_version_ 1784767026115379200
author Ben Atitallah, Bilel
Kallel, Ahmed Yahia
Bouchaala, Dhouha
Derbel, Nabil
Kanoun, Olfa
author_facet Ben Atitallah, Bilel
Kallel, Ahmed Yahia
Bouchaala, Dhouha
Derbel, Nabil
Kanoun, Olfa
author_sort Ben Atitallah, Bilel
collection PubMed
description Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is an advanced measurement method for providing information on impedance changes at several frequencies by injecting a low current into a device under test and analyzing the response voltage. Several methods have been elaborated for BIS measurement, calculating impedance with a gain phase detector (GPD), IQ demodulation, and fast Fourier transform (FFT). Although the measurement method has a big influence on the measurement system performance, a systematical comparative study has not been performed yet. In this paper, we compare them based on simulations and experimental studies. To maintain similar conditions in the implementation of all methods, we use the same signal generator followed by a voltage-controlled current source (VCCS) as a signal generator. For performance analysis, three DUTs have been designed to imitate the typical behavior of biological tissues. A laboratory impedance analyzer is used as a reference. The comparison addresses magnitude measurement accuracy, phase measurement accuracy, signal processing, hardware complexity, and power consumption. The result shows that the FFT-based system excels with high accuracy for amplitude and phase measurement while providing the lowest hardware complexity, and power consumption, but it needs a much higher software complexity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93710872022-08-12 Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems Ben Atitallah, Bilel Kallel, Ahmed Yahia Bouchaala, Dhouha Derbel, Nabil Kanoun, Olfa Sensors (Basel) Article Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is an advanced measurement method for providing information on impedance changes at several frequencies by injecting a low current into a device under test and analyzing the response voltage. Several methods have been elaborated for BIS measurement, calculating impedance with a gain phase detector (GPD), IQ demodulation, and fast Fourier transform (FFT). Although the measurement method has a big influence on the measurement system performance, a systematical comparative study has not been performed yet. In this paper, we compare them based on simulations and experimental studies. To maintain similar conditions in the implementation of all methods, we use the same signal generator followed by a voltage-controlled current source (VCCS) as a signal generator. For performance analysis, three DUTs have been designed to imitate the typical behavior of biological tissues. A laboratory impedance analyzer is used as a reference. The comparison addresses magnitude measurement accuracy, phase measurement accuracy, signal processing, hardware complexity, and power consumption. The result shows that the FFT-based system excels with high accuracy for amplitude and phase measurement while providing the lowest hardware complexity, and power consumption, but it needs a much higher software complexity. MDPI 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9371087/ /pubmed/35957369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155801 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ben Atitallah, Bilel
Kallel, Ahmed Yahia
Bouchaala, Dhouha
Derbel, Nabil
Kanoun, Olfa
Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems
title Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems
title_full Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems
title_short Comparative Study of Measurement Methods for Embedded Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Systems
title_sort comparative study of measurement methods for embedded bioimpedance spectroscopy systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957369
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155801
work_keys_str_mv AT benatitallahbilel comparativestudyofmeasurementmethodsforembeddedbioimpedancespectroscopysystems
AT kallelahmedyahia comparativestudyofmeasurementmethodsforembeddedbioimpedancespectroscopysystems
AT bouchaaladhouha comparativestudyofmeasurementmethodsforembeddedbioimpedancespectroscopysystems
AT derbelnabil comparativestudyofmeasurementmethodsforembeddedbioimpedancespectroscopysystems
AT kanounolfa comparativestudyofmeasurementmethodsforembeddedbioimpedancespectroscopysystems