Cargando…

Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021

The maritime transport of containers between ports accounts for the bulk of global trade by weight and value. Transport impedance among ports through transit times and port infrastructures can, however, impact accessibility, trade performance, and the attractiveness of ports. Assessments of the tran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Lu, Wu, Wenzhou, Yu, Hao, Su, Fenzhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957447
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155889
_version_ 1784767130696155136
author Kang, Lu
Wu, Wenzhou
Yu, Hao
Su, Fenzhen
author_facet Kang, Lu
Wu, Wenzhou
Yu, Hao
Su, Fenzhen
author_sort Kang, Lu
collection PubMed
description The maritime transport of containers between ports accounts for the bulk of global trade by weight and value. Transport impedance among ports through transit times and port infrastructures can, however, impact accessibility, trade performance, and the attractiveness of ports. Assessments of the transit routes between ports based on performance and attractiveness criteria can provide a topological liner shipping network that quantifies the performance profile of ports. Here, we constructed a directed global liner shipping network (GLSN) of the top six liner shipping companies between the ports of Africa, Asia, North/South America, Europe, and Oceania. Network linkages and community groupings were quantified through a container port accessibility evaluation model, which quantified the performance of the port using betweenness centrality, the transport impedance among ports with the transit time, and the performance of ports using the Port Liner Shipping Connectivity Index. The in-degree and out-degree of the GLSN conformed to the power-law distribution, respectively, and their R-square fitting accuracy was greater than 0.96. The community partition illustrated an obvious consistence with the actual trading flow. The accessibility evaluation result showed that the ports in Asia and Europe had a higher accessibility than those of other regions. Most of the top 30 ports with the highest accessibility are Asian (17) and European (10) ports. Singapore, Port Klang, and Rotterdam have the highest accessibility. Our research may be helpful for further studies such as species invasion and the planning of ports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93714052022-08-12 Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021 Kang, Lu Wu, Wenzhou Yu, Hao Su, Fenzhen Sensors (Basel) Article The maritime transport of containers between ports accounts for the bulk of global trade by weight and value. Transport impedance among ports through transit times and port infrastructures can, however, impact accessibility, trade performance, and the attractiveness of ports. Assessments of the transit routes between ports based on performance and attractiveness criteria can provide a topological liner shipping network that quantifies the performance profile of ports. Here, we constructed a directed global liner shipping network (GLSN) of the top six liner shipping companies between the ports of Africa, Asia, North/South America, Europe, and Oceania. Network linkages and community groupings were quantified through a container port accessibility evaluation model, which quantified the performance of the port using betweenness centrality, the transport impedance among ports with the transit time, and the performance of ports using the Port Liner Shipping Connectivity Index. The in-degree and out-degree of the GLSN conformed to the power-law distribution, respectively, and their R-square fitting accuracy was greater than 0.96. The community partition illustrated an obvious consistence with the actual trading flow. The accessibility evaluation result showed that the ports in Asia and Europe had a higher accessibility than those of other regions. Most of the top 30 ports with the highest accessibility are Asian (17) and European (10) ports. Singapore, Port Klang, and Rotterdam have the highest accessibility. Our research may be helpful for further studies such as species invasion and the planning of ports. MDPI 2022-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9371405/ /pubmed/35957447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155889 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kang, Lu
Wu, Wenzhou
Yu, Hao
Su, Fenzhen
Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021
title Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021
title_full Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021
title_fullStr Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021
title_full_unstemmed Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021
title_short Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021
title_sort global container port network linkages and topology in 2021
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35957447
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22155889
work_keys_str_mv AT kanglu globalcontainerportnetworklinkagesandtopologyin2021
AT wuwenzhou globalcontainerportnetworklinkagesandtopologyin2021
AT yuhao globalcontainerportnetworklinkagesandtopologyin2021
AT sufenzhen globalcontainerportnetworklinkagesandtopologyin2021