Cargando…

Ambient concentrations and dosimetry of inhaled size-segregated particulate matter during periods of low urban mobility in Bragança, Portugal

The restrictive measures in place during the COVID-19 pandemic provided a timely scenario to investigate the effects of human activities on air quality, and the extent to which mobility reduction strategies can impact atmospheric pollutant levels. Real-time concentrations of PM(1), PM(2.5) and PM(10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cipoli, Yago Alonso, Targino, Admir Créso, Krecl, Patricia, Furst, Leonardo Campestrini, Alves, Célia dos Anjos, Feliciano, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish National Committee for Air Pollution Research and Control. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101512
Descripción
Sumario:The restrictive measures in place during the COVID-19 pandemic provided a timely scenario to investigate the effects of human activities on air quality, and the extent to which mobility reduction strategies can impact atmospheric pollutant levels. Real-time concentrations of PM(1), PM(2.5) and PM(10) were measured using a mobile platform in a small city of Portugal, during morning and afternoon rush hours, in two distinct phases of the pandemic: emergency phase (cold period, lockdown) and calamity phase (warm period, less restricted). The Multiple-Path Particle Dosimetry Model (MPPD) was used to calculate the PM deposition for adults. Large spatio-temporal variabilities and pronounced changes in mean PM concentrations were observed, with lower concentrations in the calamity phase: PM(1) = 2.33 ± 1.61 μg m(−3); PM(2.5) = 5.15 ± 2.77 μg m(−3); PM(10) = 23.30 ± 21.53 μg m(−3) than in the emergency phase: PM(1) = 16.85 ± 31.80 μg m(−3); PM(2.5) = 30.92 ± 31.93 μg m(−3); PM(10) = 111.27 ± 104.53 μg m(−3). These changes are explained by a combination of meteorological factors and local emissions, mainly residential firewood burning. Regarding regional deposition, PM(1) was the main contributor to deposition in the tracheobronchial (5%) and pulmonary (12%) regions, and PM(10) in the head region (92%). In general, total deposition doses were higher for males than for females. This work quantitatively demonstrated that even with a 38% reduction in urban mobility during the lockdown, the use of firewood for residential heating is the main contributor to the high concentrations of PM and the respective inhaled dose.