Cargando…

Which factor can predict the effect of indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion?

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between various factors of indirect decompression. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of indirect decompression. There is no consensus regarding the predictive factors for indirect decompression. Facet joint gap (FJG) and bul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woo, Joon-Bum, Son, Dong-Wuk, Lee, Su-Hun, Lee, Jun-Seok, Lee, Sang Weon, Song, Geun Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029948
_version_ 1784767167529484288
author Woo, Joon-Bum
Son, Dong-Wuk
Lee, Su-Hun
Lee, Jun-Seok
Lee, Sang Weon
Song, Geun Sung
author_facet Woo, Joon-Bum
Son, Dong-Wuk
Lee, Su-Hun
Lee, Jun-Seok
Lee, Sang Weon
Song, Geun Sung
author_sort Woo, Joon-Bum
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to investigate the association between various factors of indirect decompression. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of indirect decompression. There is no consensus regarding the predictive factors for indirect decompression. Facet joint gap (FJG) and bulging disc thickness (BDT) have never been considered as factors in other studies. We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients who underwent OLIF L4/5 between April 2018 and September 2020. The relationships between cross-sectional area (CSA) change, CSA change ratio, spinal stenosis grade, and various factors were studied. Various factors related to indirect decompression, such as ligament flavum thickness (LFT), foraminal area (FA), disc height (DH), bulging disc thickness(BDT), and facet joint gap (FJG), were measured. CSA increased from 69.72 mm(2) preoperatively to 115.95 mm(2) postoperatively (P < .001). BDT decreased from 4.97 mm preoperatively to 2.56 mm postoperatively (P < .001). FJG (Right) increased from 2.99 mm preoperatively to 4.38 mm postoperatively (P < .001). FJG (Left) increased from 2.95 mm preoperatively to 4.52 mm postoperatively (P < .001). The improvement of spinal stenosis grade was as follows: 1 point up group, 38 patients; 2 point up groups, 19 patients; and 3 point up groups, 3 patients. The correlation factors were prespinal stenosis grade (0.723, P < .00), CSA change (0.490, P < .00), and FJG change ratio (left, 0.336, P < .008). FJG showed statistical significance with indirect decompression. Indirect decompression principles might be utilized in patients with severe spinal canal stenosis (even grade 4).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93715232022-08-16 Which factor can predict the effect of indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion? Woo, Joon-Bum Son, Dong-Wuk Lee, Su-Hun Lee, Jun-Seok Lee, Sang Weon Song, Geun Sung Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article The aim of this study was to investigate the association between various factors of indirect decompression. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of indirect decompression. There is no consensus regarding the predictive factors for indirect decompression. Facet joint gap (FJG) and bulging disc thickness (BDT) have never been considered as factors in other studies. We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients who underwent OLIF L4/5 between April 2018 and September 2020. The relationships between cross-sectional area (CSA) change, CSA change ratio, spinal stenosis grade, and various factors were studied. Various factors related to indirect decompression, such as ligament flavum thickness (LFT), foraminal area (FA), disc height (DH), bulging disc thickness(BDT), and facet joint gap (FJG), were measured. CSA increased from 69.72 mm(2) preoperatively to 115.95 mm(2) postoperatively (P < .001). BDT decreased from 4.97 mm preoperatively to 2.56 mm postoperatively (P < .001). FJG (Right) increased from 2.99 mm preoperatively to 4.38 mm postoperatively (P < .001). FJG (Left) increased from 2.95 mm preoperatively to 4.52 mm postoperatively (P < .001). The improvement of spinal stenosis grade was as follows: 1 point up group, 38 patients; 2 point up groups, 19 patients; and 3 point up groups, 3 patients. The correlation factors were prespinal stenosis grade (0.723, P < .00), CSA change (0.490, P < .00), and FJG change ratio (left, 0.336, P < .008). FJG showed statistical significance with indirect decompression. Indirect decompression principles might be utilized in patients with severe spinal canal stenosis (even grade 4). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9371523/ /pubmed/35960052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029948 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Woo, Joon-Bum
Son, Dong-Wuk
Lee, Su-Hun
Lee, Jun-Seok
Lee, Sang Weon
Song, Geun Sung
Which factor can predict the effect of indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion?
title Which factor can predict the effect of indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion?
title_full Which factor can predict the effect of indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion?
title_fullStr Which factor can predict the effect of indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion?
title_full_unstemmed Which factor can predict the effect of indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion?
title_short Which factor can predict the effect of indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion?
title_sort which factor can predict the effect of indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029948
work_keys_str_mv AT woojoonbum whichfactorcanpredicttheeffectofindirectdecompressionusingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusion
AT sondongwuk whichfactorcanpredicttheeffectofindirectdecompressionusingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusion
AT leesuhun whichfactorcanpredicttheeffectofindirectdecompressionusingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusion
AT leejunseok whichfactorcanpredicttheeffectofindirectdecompressionusingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusion
AT leesangweon whichfactorcanpredicttheeffectofindirectdecompressionusingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusion
AT songgeunsung whichfactorcanpredicttheeffectofindirectdecompressionusingobliquelumbarinterbodyfusion